Mark Warner is dominant, and, by implication, would beat Allen (like a baby seal?) head-to-head.
Mason-Dixon: 1 short take
Share this article
ADVERTISEMENT
(comments below)
Comments
Comments
-
Barnie, I’m not surprised by this poll and while it’s interesting, it’s absolutely meaningless.
These two are not running against each other right now. Warner is coasting along on a valedictory sea of good will; Allen is voting on tough issues in the Senate.
This might even be bad for Warner, if it coaxes him into a tough race. Even if he were to win, his presidential hopes would be dashed, as he would be a lowly Senate freshman having to make tough votes.
It’s always easier being a Governor or even an ex-Governor when pursuing national office–you can pick your issues and avoid others. I think Allen wishes he were identified as an ex-Governor, instead of a Senator.
-
I agree, Will. Who was last Senator to go to the Big House? Johnson? Ex-guvs have made regular stops. Carter, Reagan,
Clinton, Bush, etc. -
Baby seal? More like bull walrus. Be very careful if you approach him with a club in your hand.
-
OK, how about Warner vs. Mike Tyson? Not now, but, y’know, in their prime.
-
Warner approval rating 74%
Warner 47%
Allen 42%Let’s keep those “meaningless” numbers coming in absolutely.
-
Mr. Jaquith,
Do you hate Gov. Warner’s ears so deeply?
-
Who knows. I do know that Allen barely managed 52% against unpopular Chuck Robb.
I also know that 99% of state workers (Will perhaps being the 1%) HATE this man. HATE him. HATE HIM HATE HIM HATE HIM.
Why? Mainly because he hired his highest donors’ housewives to run state agencies.

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.