Mail-in Voting as Entitlement

Mail-in voting delays the count, opens up elections to suspicion and conspiracies, and undermines those elected to serve. But it’s become another government entitlement.

by Ken Reid

Counting mail-in ballots. Image created by Chat GBT

FALLS CHURCH – I’m sitting in a conference room in Falls Church City Hall,  joined by another election officer (she the Democrat; me the Republican), opening up hundreds of envelopes containing mail-in ballots.

Our job is to look at the declaration form on the inner envelope containing the ballot, and if the voter required assistance to fill out the ballot or to show identification, we have to make sure the form is in there. If not, the city elections board will call the voter to get the ballot “cured” – a process the city was doing all along before state law required it.

About half the ballots were mailed, the other half dropped in drop boxes at City Hall. The one in the parking lot seems secure, locked down; the one in the lobby, well, it can be easily opened in the back, but I am assured security cameras are rolling—as they are on us handling these ballots.

Once we confirm the declaration, and at times having to check the voter rolls, we open the ballot and drop it in one of those big US Mail bins. We then count the ballots to be sure they equal the envelopes, and this is recorded in ink on a paper sheet. Each outer envelope and declaration gets numbered, too – but not the ballot itself.

While there is a political party observer watching, the key thing is what happens AFTER we leave.

That’s when the ballots are run into the scanners. I think there is a Democrat and Republican observer for this process, but at least the registrar is there to observe. I guess the elections officer, like me, can stay, but we’re not being paid for this part.

We’ve already reached 45% of registered voters voting early, much by mail or drop box. We have to divide the ones put in the drop boxes at City Hall and those that were mailed in. We open each one, look at the declaration to see if all the required information is there, and then we open the ballot and drop it in a US Post Office bin.

Each mailing and ballot envelope get marked with the same number “D” for drop box, “M” for mail. The ballot is not marked, so it stays secret.

It’s unreal to see the ages of the mail-in and drop off ballots – it’s not just the elderly, but the very young. Voters must put their birth year on the declaration containing the ballot – and a number of these voters are just 18-20 years old.

I wonder – why can’t they get off their duffs and vote in person, given that we have six weeks of early in-person voting in Virginia?

And then there are the UOCAVA ballots – The Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act — which provides for ballots to be emailed to registered voters overseas, mainly military and State Department employees.

These are the most frustrating, because the voter has to print the ballot out on their end and mail it to Falls Church City Hall. Ballots are often taped inside in a way that takes five minutes to open them, and there is no declaration page with their full city address, birth year, etc. So, we have to go into the “poll book” and mark off if the voter is actually registered.

And the ballots themselves cannot be machine tabulated because the Virginia Board of Elections never gave the vendor approval to send a scannable ballot to these folks.  

They have to be hand-counted on election day, and we’re looking at about 300 of them. Statewide, there could be 50,000, according to election registrars I have spoken with. All have to be hand-counted, primarily during the day.

Besides failing to approve a scannable ballot, why not work with the federal government’s ID system to allow voters to email them back securely and be counted electronically? Virtually all these voters have government issued “CAC” or “PIV” cards to facilitate that.

Texas allows overseas voters to vote by FaceTime or Zoom as long as they sign a statement saying they waive their right to a secret ballot. 

But AI and “virtual assistants” people could vote that way too and vote secretly. So, why can’t Virginia do that, too, especially given the large number of citizens here who are in the military or diplomatic corps?

Isn’t all this paper a bit dangerous and subject to human error, especially sticking mail-in ballots into the scanners one by one -– unless some electoral boards can use an automatic document feeder? I don’t know.

What’s really crappy about this expansion of mail-in early voting is the delay in getting the results, which in a presidential election, and knowing how conspiracy theorists are with social media, only sows seeds of doubt about the outcome. 

Democrats, who created this system in Virginia and other states under the guise of the COVID emergency, probably don’t want to admit that unrestricted mail-in voting leads to “election denial,” but all they cared about was making it as easy as possible for people to vote so Democrats can hit them with mail, phone calls, texts and even personal visits to get them to vote their sample ballot.

Republican early voting has certainly increased in this election, but the process of “ballot chasing” and “ballot harvesting” benefits the Democrats since most of their voters live in more concentrated cities and suburbs, whereas Republican voters are in more rural areas where there is less concentration of voters.

Some 80 million have voted, about half the total turnout in 2020, not all mail-in – but quite a lot. Arizona and Nevada, two battleground states, have virtually all mail in voting. We won’t know those results until Monday. 

Pennsylvania politicians couldn’t come to agreement to allow mail-in ballots to at least be counted ON election day, so we may not know results there for days – and thus, the paranoiacs will suspect “fraud.”  

But no-excuse mail-in voting is going to be hard to take away, even if Trump and the GOP win handily, thus making Democrats think twice about this stupid system.

That’s because being able to vote by mail, no matter how able you are, has become a kind of entitlement: a means for the government to hold your hand so you only have to fill in the black boxes on the ballot and the election officers will take care of the rest

And it’s going to be very hard to take this entitlement away, much like trying to repeal Obamacare, or reform Social Security and food stamps.

Besides the potential for errors –- note, I did not say “fraud” because I don’t believe “fraud” and stealing exists in sufficient number — nobody talks about the cost of all of this to the taxpayer.

What’s the cost of having satellite voting stations open a month or more in advance, and hiring people like me (at $20 an hour), to do all this handwork, only to have the most-critical part of the process (scanning and counting) occurring after we all leave the conference room?

Nobody also wants to talk about how unfair and difficult this is for candidates and how long voting periods and mail-in ballots only raises the cost of candidates reaching voters. I believe the 2022 congressional mid-terms cost $6 billion (both parties combined) and Kamala Harris is expected to break $1 billion just on her presidential effort.

There are now consultants you can hire to do ballot chasing and harvesting. It’s no longer “Election Day” but “Election Month.”

I don’t like six weeks of early voting like we have in Virginia, but apparently, it was always allowed for mail-in ballots since the UOCAVA law gives overseas voters six weeks. But in-person voting for the rest of us didn’t start until three weeks prior to the Democrat takeover of Richmond in 2020. Indeed, turnout has improved (but primarily for federal races).   

But my guess is that if legislators try to monkey with this system, unless there is some clear-cut irregularity or PROVEN FRAUD, no legislature will want to take away this new mail-in ballot entitlement.

And, I also don’t see Congress stepping in with national standards either.

Back to counting, folks….

Ken Reid, lives in McLean. He has served on the Leesburg Town Council and Loudoun Board of Supervisors (2006-2017). He has attended numerous Republican county and state elections and was a Trump delegate to the 2016 and 2020 Republican National Convention. He is the author of “The Six Secrets to Winning Any Local Election – and Navigating Elected Office Once You Win.”


ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)




Comments


Comments

60 responses to “Mail-in Voting as Entitlement”

  1. John Harvie Avatar
    John Harvie

    …why canโ€™t they get off their duffs and vote in person given we have six weeks of early in person voting in Virginia?

    Admittedly I'm now in FL but some of them may be 96 like me

    1. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      I believe the reference to "duffs" was directed at younger voters for whom I can imagine several credible reasons for mail-in voting: out of town for the period; attending school in another jurisdiction; interning in another jurisdiction. And, oh, exercising a convenient method of voting. Where's the beer?

      1. James Kiser Avatar
        James Kiser

        Interesting that students in other jurisdictions get to register to vote in those areas plus be registered in their home states

  2. Teddy007 Avatar

    Vote by mail does not delay voting if the state uses an in-hand standard and starts processing the mailed ballots before election day. See Colorado that uses vote for mail for everyone and still reports within 24 hours. States are slow because of state laws that make voting slow.

    1. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      But, but….the 2020 reporting delays (especially by the "regime" media) aggravated the Red Mirage perception by P45 causing him to burst into claims of cheating and fraud. Slow reporting causes unwelcome emotional and legal responses. OTOH, it is likely safe to say that accelerated vote counts including mail-in will cause other emotional and legal maladies. No win, no win.

    2. DJRippert Avatar

      This election seemed to have been counted and decided with good speed.

      1. Teddy007 Avatar

        ARizoan is still being slow along with California, Oregon, and Washington.

  3. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    And your source and volume for this observation? And VA students studying in other jurisdictions do not multiple register?

    1. James Kiser Avatar
      James Kiser

      probably do

  4. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    Having read the Constitution regarding your point, advise the author who suggested national voting procedures. Not my words, his.

    BTW, since the nation is a republic is it not within the authority of Congress to legislate on federal elections?

      1. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        Darn!!! Article 1, Sec. 4, Clause 1. Would yโ€™all offer your reading of the clause? Thanx.

      2. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        Let me help you with the provision:

        The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.

  5. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    โ€opens up elections to suspicion and conspiraciesโ€

    Like NC-9?

    1. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      Would there be limits to either suspicion and conspiracies?

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Not when half the country are in a party that believes them and promotes them to the point some poor pizza chef gets shot.

  6. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    If you graduated from UVa and STILL voted for Donald Trump then I have lost all respect for you.

    Wait! Scratch that voting stuff. Itโ€™s redundant.

  7. Teddy007 Avatar

    Oregon is a postmark state so reporting final results will be slow. However, it appears that Oregon starts processing of mailed votes before election date.

  8. LarrytheG Avatar

    I wonder if Haner has a phone and can use it while he is doing his election duties….. ๐Ÿ˜‰

  9. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    You were right to delete that Carolโ€ฆ

    Republicans donโ€™t want all male votingโ€ฆ just that wives should vote like hubby tells themโ€ฆ

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/political-ad-ignites-conservative-anger-women-possibly-hiding-vote-hus-rcna178584

    I could post more links of prominent Republicans likening spousal independent voting to infidelity if youโ€™d like Carol.

    1. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      Humor to some is the equivalent of potty mouth statements – in certain circumstances, people say. Misspelling male is not forgivable.

    2. LarrytheG Avatar

      deleted?

    3. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      I chose to re-write my deleted post eliminating the censorable material (of which I was unaware) thought by some to be out of bounds – or at least BR bounds or some unknown bounds.

  10. Not Today Avatar

    Let the handwringing begin. The preemptive answer to your questions is simple fellas. DOBBS. Weโ€™re not going back.

  11. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    The author, a Republican, urges national voting lesgislation concerning (it seems) regulating and standardizing mail in voting. As a rule, that party has consistently opposed ferderalization of voting. He criticizes the creation of such voting in VA under the โ€œguise of COVID.โ€ Yutes, he notes, are too lazy to get off their duffs to vote in person without reason. He carps about the costs of mail in (actually early voting) as a burden on candidates in reaching voters especially those in rural areas where more Republican voters reside. Whatโ€™s the true downside to increasing the electorate? For either party?

    The author seems to believe the $20/ph wage paid for election workers inadequate to the responsibility of the tasks. The payment is well above the minimum wage. If, perhaps, his point is that the wage is too high and an expense burden to the state, he could, as I did, fill the role voluntarily as a civic contribution.

    Why, he seems to criticize, does the โ€œgovernment[s]โ€ seek to create a voting entitlement, hold your hand to fill in a few boxes, and โ€œthe election officers will take care of the rest.โ€ Some ask why not.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      re: " Whatโ€™s the true downside to increasing the electorate? For either party?"

      well, if it helps the "other side"…..

      1. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        Gee, I thought competition (for votes) was a primary value of both sides.

      2. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        NBC Early Voting data nationally for 82+ million indicates 41%D, 39%R, 22% Other.

          1. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            Math and facts aren't his strong suit.

    2. Ken Reid Avatar

      I think you have misinterpreted what I wrote. I am not arguing for national voting rules, nor higher pay for election workers. Maybe things went smooth in Virginia, but we are still awaiting results in many US House races across the country, and it's likely because of the time it takes to process those mail in ballots. Many smaller cities and counteis dont have machiens that can scan hundreds of ballots automatically, so they have to be run through the machines One by One. Have you ever worked as an election officer or run for office in this early voting environment, which really began with Obama in 2012? Please advise.

  12. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    Yup. The post in question was maybe ten words but salacious – to some – nonetheless.

  13. LarrytheG Avatar

    it would be easier if each deleted post had the reason and the objectionable material so one
    could re-write more effectively! sometimes,
    it's not even clear that it was deleted…

    1. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      Nah, that would mean the exposition of criteria and a diminution of the deleterโ€™s power. Also, such would likely expose (gasp!!) a political tilt.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        I'm sure this is not what JAB intended.

    2. Skip name calling, (including insulting nicknames), profanity, obscenity, and derogatory terms like liar, idiot and moron and unfunny snark and youโ€™ll avoid 99% of the reasons for deletion.

      1. DJRippert Avatar

        So, I can't call Jen Psaki "Little Red Lying Hood" anymore?

        How about The Imperial Clown Show in Richmond?

      2. LarrytheG Avatar

        if those rules were strictly enforced no matter who – it would be better imo.
        Sometimes it seems they are not.

        1. James McCarthy Avatar
          James McCarthy

          Your reply might violate the unfunny snark criterion—somehow.

      3. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        BR posters are fond of naming Dems as democrats without a capital "D." Was my use of Republicant (Republican't) deletable? What's "unfunny" snark? Example, please.

        Obscenity? Someone recently posted an X item about Mr. Emhoff stating his wife (Ms. Harris) "put her head down" and went to work.

  14. LarrytheG Avatar

    in theory.. ๐Ÿ˜‰ One side has a long history of the opposite…

    1. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      I learned in polisci one side favored free market competition. If I recall accurately, BR asserts that principle. Perhaps it applies only to commerce and trade but not ideas or opinions. Iโ€™m out of school too long.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        Oh.. it’s even “libertarian” lite in theory… but yeah.. I do remember well.. guns and butter with the tax revenues!

  15. LarrytheG Avatar

    on the masthead…subject to "interpretation"

  16. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    The essential benchmark for such a vital role.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      JAB’s primary focus was the flame wars and personal attacks on commenters, that sort of thing. He wants the free exchange on the issues themselves but keep it on the issue not the person

    2. LarrytheG Avatar

      There was a guy in Va.. “Keep the big boys honest”… flavor

  17. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    See the โ€œ principlesโ€ of the Rebellion, notably the first one.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      “Free markets and the individual pursuit of enlightened self-interest are the most efficient means of allocating resources and creating wealth โ€“ most of the time”

      got that caveat…

  18. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    Hobbes and several other political philosophers described that state of nature related to the free, individual pursuit as nasty and brutish. The contemporary analogue is libertarianism.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      3rd world countries are the closest matches. Less, govt, less regulation, more free market. Nasty and brutish.

  19. DJRippert Avatar

    "I wonder โ€“ why canโ€™t they get off their duffs and vote in person given we have six weeks of early in person voting in Virginia?"

    Because they go to college far from where they live and can't afford the time to drive back home to vote in person?

    1. Ken Reid Avatar

      fair point, but how do you explain people in their 20s, 30s, 40s voting by mail in a small city like Falls Church where it's pretty easy to go down to city hall and vote in person? Sorry, but this no-excuses mail in voting for six weeks is nonsense. Have you ever worked as an elections officer or candidate for office in the last 10 years?

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        vote by phone and you'll have the best voting numbers ever!

  20. DJRippert Avatar

    What's a reasonable expectation for a national election? In a close election, I think 2 to 3 days ought to be fine.

    God knows how long it must have taken to count the votes and announce the winner back during the early days of the Republic.

    1. Teddy007 Avatar

      If a state is an in-hand state, 24 hours is enough. If a postmark state, then it should be 24 hours after the acceptance period ends.

  21. LarrytheG Avatar

    yep. the "enforcement" of the rules seems a little arbitrary at times and also varies by person. Good question DJR! Cackling Kalma indeed!

  22. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Didnโ€™t you graduate from UVa? Got that goinโ€™ for me too.

Leave a Reply


ADVERTISEMENT