Every four years Virginia’s gubernatorial candidates announce their positions on economic development: they’re in favor of it.
This election year, economic development requires more than platitudes. There are several issues related to economic development that are roiling and will require leadership from the new Governor. One Man’s Trash recently surveyed two of the important issues: the future of regionalism and the use of costly incentives to lure companies to the Old Dominion. To those I would add special programs and spending to help “distressed areas” and the heavy use of state resources to promote selling to state government as a business development tool.
I’ll be looking for Fitch, Kaine, Kilgore, and Potts to talk specifics when they’re asked about economic development. Should we spend more on incentives to be “competitive” with other states, or does this just encourage “shopping” by companies looking for the best short-term deal? Should the state keep encouraging regional pooling of economic development resources, or are potential withdrawals by members of the Greater Richmond Partnership a harbinger of collapsing regionalism? Does Virginia need more “Virginia Works” spending on untested creative ideas or should existing state organizations be held accountable?
Economic Development is in the midst of tremendous change. Not all those in the business are adjusting their approach enough in the face of change–leadership is critical. I’ll be looking for the candidate who recognizes change and addresses new realities. A cautious approach is exactly what we don’t need, but so far I haven’t seen a lot risk-taking by any of the campaigns.
It’s still early, though.

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.