Evaluating The Governor’s Race Using Sabato’s Ten Keys to the Mansion

Writing for the Cooper Center in February 2002

about Governor Warner’s election, Professor Larry Sabato wrote, “Since 1969, the party with the advantage on the ‘Ten Keys to the Governor’s Mansion’ has invariably captured the governorship.”

I don’t know how Professor Sabato is calling the race this year, but here’s my take on his “Ten Keys” applied to this year’s Governor’s race:

1) Economy: Advantage N
While gas prices are high and folks are concerned about how they’ll heat their homes this winter, taxes in Virginia remain lower than in other states; per capita income is still up and unemployment is still down (except in rural parts of the state where dissatisfaction may help Kilgore).

2) Party Unity: Advantage (D)
This is the first time in years Republican candidates have run from the party “brand” failing to include it in advertisements. Why? The Party has been injured by scandal (the eavesdropping case), and the primary season was bitter.

Democrats are united behind Kaine, albeit with less enthusiasm than he would want.

3) Scandal: Advantage (D)
The eavesdropping case…the resignation of a Congressman…the link between Bolling and a failed insurance company… none of this helps the R’s.

4) Campaign Operations and Technology: Advantage (R)
It will take the D’s in Virginia years to make up for the Party’s failure to enter the technology age sooner.

5) Campaign Money: Advantage (R)
Kilgore has shown, once again, that unless a Democratic candidate is a millionaire, Republicans will out raise Democrats (especially when they get to hide the names of their contributors)

6) Candidate Personality and Appeal: Advantage N
Kilgore seems brittle; Kaine seems elastic. Kaine’s natural charm isn’t translating in the media.

7) Prior Office Experience: Advantage (R)
Kilgore’s experience as Attorney General and Secretary of Public Safety has given him a solid record to run on. Kaine’s tenure in the “weak mayor” job and on City Council, left him fighting the negative perceptions of the City without marginal success.

8) Retrospective judgment of previous governor: Advantage (D)
Governor Warner’s popularity is a huge asset but difficult to leverage. Kilgore can hardly tout Gilmore.

9) Presidential popularity: Advantage (D)
Bush is down, but not out in Virginia, but he won’t help Kilgore with independent voters who are the key to this election.

10) Special issues and dominant circumstances: Advantage (R)
Like it or not (and I don’t), the immigration issue provides Kilgore’s campaign with some momentum going into election day.

Net Advantage: 4(D), 4 (R), 2 (N)

Guess we know why the race is a “dead heat,” with the deciding factor out of the candidates control…it’s what Sabato calls the “prevailing conditions.” This year the voters have a very positive view of the direction in which Virginia is headed and a pretty negative view of Bush and the federal government. Clearly, this factor favors Kaine.

But, there’s one thing that Sabato’s “Keys” don’t address, which is voter intensity about the candidates and about the election itself. Although articles in the MSM today quote insiders as saying that voter interest is picking up, it is still likely that “I don’t give a darn” may be the spoiler candidate this year rather than the independent candidate Potts.

If turnout meets Sabato’s projected 2 million voters (slightly higher than in 2001), I think Kaine will win. If turnout is below 2001’s 46.2%, and especially if turnout among African American voters is less than 15% of the total, I think that Kilgore wins.

We’ll all know Tuesday (or maybe later if the election is as close as many predict). Who knows? If it’s a close as some think it will be, we may not know who won until after all provisional ballots are counted and the final count is certified by the State Board of Elections. And, even then, we might be headed for a recount.

At least we won’t have butterfly ballots.


ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)




Comments


Comments

9 responses to “Evaluating The Governor’s Race Using Sabato’s Ten Keys to the Mansion”

  1. Anonymous Avatar

    I’d have to give the advantage in the first category, the economy, to the D’s. With the exception of a couple of low population pockets, Virginia is booming and Warner gets a great deal of credit. Gas prices are dropping back toward’s $2-2.20 a gallon and the SUV’s are back on the road sucking it down. People just keep spending. (You’re right about the personality thing working to neither advantage.)

  2. John Epps Avatar

    In the 2005 Kaine-Kilgore race, this gray-haired Virginian from Ashburn sees a real similarity with the the 1977 race between Liberal Democrat Henry Howell and Conservative Republican John Dalton. Howell was an unabashed liberal but, unlike Tim Kaine, had the courage to admit it. Like Tim Kaine, Howell supported higher taxes, encouraged the growth of labor unions in Virginia businesses, and thought that the ACLU’s views on sociology were correct. He sucessfully obtained the Democratic nomination for Governor and the conservative Democrat “Byrd Machine” that had governed our Commonwealth so well for years decided to join forces with the Republican Party. Today, Tim Kaine carries the mantle of social liberalism and activist government that Henry Howell preached and that Mark Warner tried to avoid like the plague. We old Byrd Democrats will be voting for Jerry Kilgore this time just like we voted for John Dalton in 1977.

  3. Anonymous Avatar

    Mr. Epps,

    I am the son of a Byrd Democrat, and the progeny of Virginians who have taken their living from, and buried their dead, in the soil of Virginia since the 1740s. So your gray hair has nothing on me. And sir, I will with great pride cancel your vote.

    Need I remind you that it was a former Byrd Democrat, Mills Godwin, who first imposed the sales tax in order to benefit education?

    Beginning with Holton (a Republican) and Godwin (once a Democrat and then a Republican), almost every Virginia Governor has looked to the long term, as true fiscal conservatives do, to ensure that we are providing for a future worthy of Virginia’s past. I count Dalton among those. Mr. Warner’s two predecessors are the exceptions.

    I cannot in good conscience allow you to tar Kaine’s good name without a response. And if you’d like my pick for 2009, I am sincerely hoping that John Chichester will run for Governor.

    God bless you, and good luck, but I shall venture to say that you have picked wrong this time.

  4. Anonymous Avatar

    Just because you are old doesn’t mean that screaming liberal at the top of your lungs in lieu of actual argument, regardless of reality, is anything but childish.

  5. Anonymous Avatar

    Mr. Epps: (Is that the Hopewell Epps, btw? If so, we’re probably acquainted.)

    I recall both times I met Mills Godwin. The first, in his first term, I was quite young, but I remember how firm his handshake was. Then, later, I was a Scout, at Berkely Plantation for the annual Thanksgiving festival. After “Taps” was played (it was composed there, you know), Gov. Godwin came up to me and shook my hand. It was a wonderful experience.

    I never once worried about the fact that he was a racist SOB.

    Ahh, youth.

  6. criticallythinking Avatar
    criticallythinking

    If Kaine has all the momentum, why did the Washington Post feel it had to do a “do-over” on it’s endorsement of Kaine? What did they see in the polling that scared them so much?

    Their first endorsement was a pretty even mix of why they liked Kaine, and why Kilgore was evil. This one was almost all ‘Kilgore=Bad’. Except for the “Warner was great, and Kaine should keep doing what Warner did”.

    But they did their endorsement already. Is it common for the Washington Post to do two endorsements for one candidate, with different points?

    And the message of the endorsement was “please, virginia, don’t vote for Jerry Kilgore”.

    If it’s going to upset the Washington Post so much if we vote for Jerry, isn’t that just another great reason to get out the vote for a republican victory?

  7. Anonymous Avatar

    How about doing some critical thinking? Do you really expect newspapers to never comment on a race again after they give their endorsements?

    “What did they see in the polling that scared them so much?”

    I dunno: what do you see in the polling that is so scary for Kaine? The polling is pretty much best-case scenario for Kaine: in fact, better than they could have hoped for going into the final few days.

    The anemic turnout at Jerry’s GOTV rallies certainly doesn’t bode well. The Fairfax event had to have been a major blow right in the gut: you ahve two of the most popular statewide Republicans out stumping with you in a major major target with tons of Republicans living there… and you can’t even manage to draw 200 people? On the eve of the election?

  8. Anonymous Avatar

    The Times Dispatch editorial page has continue to pound on Kaine in the waning days — if editorial pages really want to have an impact, repetition, repitition, repitition…

  9. Well, that is an interesting and legit question about the WaPo.

    Typically, they issue their endorsement of a statewide candidate on the sunday before the election.

    This year they gave their endorsement ten days out, reiterated it in whole two days out, and added piecemeal editorial pieces in between.

    I can only imagine they realize we may be looking at the closest Virginia election since 1989-and maybe since 1978-and have decided to not leave anything in the editing room and post every argument they can muster.

Leave a Reply


ADVERTISEMENT