Does a Hedge Fund Want to Buy This House?

by Dick Hall-Sizemore

State Sen. Glenn Sturtevant (R-Chesterfield) plans to reintroduce his bill to prohibit investment firms worth more than $50 million from purchasing homes in Virginia, reports the Virginia Mercury.

The bill is a reaction to the perception that investment firms are buying a disproportionate share of houses on the market, particularly houses that have traditionally be seen as “starter” homes. Many feel that the presence of these large financial firms in the market has been a major factor in pushing real estate prices beyond the reach of many first-time home buyers. “It’s ultimately not fair for them to be competing with regular people,” Sturtevant explained.

It is not clear how big this “problem” is. Sturtevant cites research that shows that “around 4,300 single-family homes in the Richmond area are owned by investors.” A study of real estate sales in Richmond, Henrico, and Chesterfield during 2018-2021 showed that the three areas in which investor activity was the highest also experienced the highest increase in the median price of a house. However, in neither of these instances is “investor” defined. It could be a large hedge fund or it could be an individual buying a house with the intention of flipping it or a couple buying a house as a long-term rental investment. Sturtevant says that the two latter types of investors are not the target of his bill.

The real estate and investment community has pushed back on this legislation at the national level. They protest either that hedge funds are not buying houses at the level that is being claimed or, even if they are doing so, that activity is not affecting the cost of housing.

Sturtevant introduced this legislation in the 2024 Session. It was carried over in the Senate Committee of Courts of Justice and died quietly. He is preparing to put it in again. With so much attention on the “housing crisis”, Chris Saxman, the executive director of FREE, a business-oriented interest group, thinks Sturtevant’s bill has a good chance of being approved by the General Assembly in the upcoming session.

My Soapbox

It is worth noting that the sponsor of this legislation that would regulate business, limit private property rights, and mess with free markets is not one of those crazy, “socialist” Democrats so often criticized on this blog. And he is not the only Republican to support such legislation. None other than Gov. Greg Abbot of Texas has endorsed the idea, declaring on X that “this corporate large-scale buying of residential homes seems to be distorting the market and making it harder for the average Texan to purchase a home. This must be added to the legislative agenda to protect Texas families.”

These are strange times.

I have been getting a call at least once a week from someone asking if I am interested in selling my house. When I ask the callers what they are willing to offer, they hedge and won’t give an answer. With one of these callers, after some back and forth discussion, I told him that my asking price was $750,000. Exasperated, he hung up. I am now wondering if there is a connection between these calls and this activity by large financial organizations. The next time I get one of these calls, I am going to ask the caller who he or she works for.


ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)




Comments


Comments

11 responses to “Does a Hedge Fund Want to Buy This House?”

  1. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Pause might be in order when you find yourself on the same side of the barricades as Greg Abbot, but more than a few credible sources have cited the โ€œZillow Effectโ€ in exacerbating the affordable housing market.

    Daughter has been in her โ€œstarterโ€ house 2.25 years and according to Zillow could bank 20% profit. And I think she paid too much.

    "The last word" is the most dangerous of infernal machines; and husband and wife should no more fight to get it than they would struggle for the possession of a lighted bomb-shell. -Douglas William Jerrold, playwright and humorist (3 Jan 1803-1857)

  2. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    WOW! "Prohibited acquisition of residential land; restrictions; civil penalty. Restricts any partnership, corporation, or real estate investment trust that manages funds pooled from investors, is a fiduciary to such investors, and has $50 million or more in net value or assets under management on any day during a taxable year from acquiring any interest in residential land,"

    so much for conservatism and the free market!

  3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    โ€œThey protest either that hedge funds are not buying houses at the level that is being claimed or, even if they are doing so, that activity is not affecting the cost of housing.โ€

    Well if they arenโ€™t buying the houses, then this legislation will do no harm. If they are, they are affecting the cost of housing and this legislation will do some good.

  4. Clarity77 Avatar
    Clarity77

    "It is worth noting that the sponsor of this legislation that would regulate business, limit private property rights, and mess with free markets is not one of those crazy, โ€œsocialistโ€ Democrats so often criticized on this blog."

    Dick, clue me in as to why it is "worth noting" as it has been rather clear and obvious to us American people in the last election who clearly and overwhelmingly did not vote for the "crazy, "socialist" Democrats"? Are you starting to wake up?

    What is "worth noting" especially to Virginians in this year's election is which party controls the Virginia Senate Committee of Courts who killed the bill? Could it be the party of those "crazy, "socialist" Democrats so often(and rightfully) criticized on this blog"?

  5. 4,300 out of about 382,000* single family homes is about 1.1%. I would not think that would have a noticeable effect on overall house prices.

    *Estimate based on subtracting total rental units from total housing units. Obviously not pinpoint accuracy, but probably underestimates single family units since some of them are also rentals.

  6. Who needs facts to make new laws…..look at VMSDEP

  7. The best that can be said about Republicans is that, on average, they are less hostile to free markets than Democrats. It ain't the party of Ronald Reagan anymore.

    Under Donald Trump, Republicans have embraced wielding the power of government to advance social goals — they just have different social goals than Democrats do. Democrats want to protect "marginalized" groups. Republicans want to protect "working people."

  8. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    This is funny. Is this not the quintessential entrepreneurial success story
    when, likely, some guy/gal learn to rehabilitate a house and then flip it to make a living at it so they hired others, formed a company and now are
    a successful business that hires people/provides jobs, buy supplies and services from other companies, not to mention helping the original owner, and contributes to the local/regional economy, paying taxes, etc?

    So the reward for this quintessential American entrepreneurial success story is to outlaw it?

  9. Paul Sweet Avatar
    Paul Sweet

    I wonder if they're concentrating on houses in rapidly developing areas so they can resell the land to a developer in a few years.

  10. Carter Melton Avatar
    Carter Melton

    Ahhh…the arrogance of the social engineer. Knows better than you how to manage your personal real property.

    I am reading Thomas Sowell's book "Fallacies of Social Justice" and this proposed legislation fits to a "T" his description how isolated elites…devoid of…or indifferent to… what he calls "consequential knowledge"….impose their will on ordinary people they are elected to serve.

    Republican or Democrat….liberal or conservative….a pox on all your houses.

  11. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    What is the relevant market? Homes in Virginia? Homes in NoVA? Homes in Fairfax County? Starter homes in a geographic area? Starter homes for sale in a geographic area? Depending on the specific market, one could argue that there is a group conspiring to monopolize the market or to fix prices. Both monopolization and price fixing are violations of antitrust law.

Leave a Reply


ADVERTISEMENT