Digging Deeper on the Link Between Spending and Educational Achievement

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA


ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)




Comments


Comments

4 responses to “Digging Deeper on the Link Between Spending and Educational Achievement”

  1. Vic Nicholls Avatar
    Vic Nicholls

    I would want to see how much time a parent is spending with the child, how much TV they are allowed to watch, and whether a father was in the home or not.

  2. James Bacon Avatar
    James Bacon

    I agree, those are probably the most critical variables of all. But unless they changed significantly between 2008 and 2014, they don’t explain the decline in poor, black and ESL performance during that time.

    1. Larrytheg Avatar

      and if you’re going to make that a premise – you have to measure it – get the metrics and demonstrate it. It’s does no one any good to make unsubstantiated conjecture. Keep in mind – many rich folks in this country send their kids to private 24/7 boarding schools to get a “good” education where the parent is not involved…

      how does that “work”? would you be in favor of such schools for low income who do not want to do that parental part?

  3. Larrytheg Avatar

    you’ve got a couple of three “big” issues to dig into.

    1. – first, note on your funding chart – this: ” Combined state and local school funding per student,”

    why is this important?

    because , first we don’t know if the State short-funded or the locality. In Virginia the State typically “funds” the SOQs AND requires a local match.

    So which side short-funded?

    2. – do you know what funding is used to pay for what things that are tested?

    In Virginia – where most school districts ADD – MORE local funding than the state requires – that money typically does not go to pay for core SOL subjects that are tested but rather other things.

    If schools cut local funding were they cutting funding for SOL-tested subjects? Probably not.

    3. – NAEP testing is not done at all schools – In Virginia it’s done at 99 schools out of hundreds. To give an idea how little this is – Henrico County alone has more than 70 elementary school including several that failed to get accreditation this year. How many of these schools tested NAEP and were any of them the ones that failed accreditation?

    so basically there are huge flaws in looking at total funding – that pays for things that are not testing – and then trying to use NAEP testing data to represent overall performance of schools in general.

    I support efforts to drill down on performance data and am frustrated by the lack of transparency but not having that transparency and going forward leads to badly flawed analysis and conclusions.

Leave a Reply


ADVERTISEMENT