CDC Has Three Recommendations on the Masking of Children. None of Them Match.
Share this article
ADVERTISEMENT
(comments below)
Comments
Comments
23 responses to “CDC Has Three Recommendations on the Masking of Children. None of Them Match.”
-
Your linked page in 3 also says under SARS-CoV-2 transmission in schools among students, families, teachers, and school staff: “The evidence to date suggests that staff-to-student and student-to-student transmission are not the primary means of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 among infected children. Several studies have also concluded that students are not the primary sources of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 among adults in school setting.”
So I must be dense, but how does that equate to universal K-12 masking?
-
CDC has a political opinion and a scientific opinion that conflict. It stands firmly behind both.
-
Funny, so does everyone.
-
Not everyone.
I do not stand firmly behind any of the CDC’s opinions.
-
-
-
See my update above that cites evidence that the CDC changed its school masking recommendations under pressure from the NEA.
-
-
Rather than ‘vaccine’ status, considering that children are more at risk from the vaccine (or bicycle accidents) than they are from Omicron, and that the vaccines are not effective against the transmission or infection of the SARS CoV 2 virus, how about using ANTIBODY tests to establish immunity? Most of us should have a robust natural immunity in short order! https://www.msn.com/en-in/lifestyle/other/omicron-effect-we-ll-all-have-some-immunity-to-covid-19-soon/ar-AAT54Wl
-
I didn’t check every one of the studies listed on the CDC page, but a lot of them have the publication date–and none of them are after omicron.
-
It will take time to gather and assess omicron data. CDC has exhibited far too much haste in publishing guidelines. It has gotten them, and us, in trouble. We are all at risk when a major health science organization loses credibility. I am afraid that CDC has sacrificed its reputation to haste and political pressure.
-
Yesterday on Twitter VA Democrats were touting another recent study, but it too was pre Covid-O. Apparently in schools with strict masking, 43 cases per 100K and in schools without 75 cases per 100K, or some such. The claim was, see? 60 percent fewer!! Uh, in both situations 99,900+ of that 100,000 never got a positive test, masks or not. I read the study differently than them…(but the goal for them is zero infections, impossible, but only that will shut them up.)
-
My update above cites evidence that the CDC changed its school masking recommendations under pressure from the NEA.
-
-
-
Another thing CDC recently said schools should cancel band and sports in areas of high transmission. To my knowledge schools are not doing that, however adult community bands in NoVA are largely taking a break until the numbers come down closer to Fall levels. I personally theorize it is the human voice spreading the COVID, but concert bands get lumped in with choirs as high risk.
-
Yeah, Its my choice… and lets ban abortions
-
Its my choice… Ban Abortions!
-
Updated that many times in a year and a half, eh?
It would have been a whole lot easier if when they opened the box, they had kept the directions.
“Do it my way. Any fool can read the instructions.”
-
six months
-
I had forgotten that the CDC changed its mask recommendation under pressure from the NEA. I have added the evidence of that to the column. Thanks.
-
-
none of them match yet they still manage to all be wrong
masks don’t work and never did and we had plenty of evidence to show this before COVID was ever engineered by CCP military biowarfare specialists paid by Anthony Fauci with US tax dollars
-
Brother Sherlock, a question: Now that the bill deadline has passed, has anybody put in a bill to actually grant authority to a governor over any of these questions? A bill to mandate the COV2 vaccines for school attendance? To clearly mandate masks, rather than to make vague reference to unclear and changing CDC advice? My guess is even the Democrats now posturing haven’t actually backed up their virtue signals with legislation….I’ll look too.
Responding to “Project,” it is clear and solidly proven that the real masks, worn properly, greatly reduce the chance of infection despite real exposures. I often refer to my daughter the NP, who tells me she accepts that, but her employer expects her to provide it — for her job, she can’t get one from them.
-
there is literally zero basis to believe mask policy can work, we just tried it everywhere and it worked nowhere under any conditions no matter how much compliance there was
enough already
-
HOUSE BILL NO. 1038 (Scott, P.A. and Cordoza) takes a step in that direction. It denies a Governor the authority to mandate masking. The gist of it is:
“However, no such order or regulation shall require (i) the wearing of masks or other face coverings or (ii) businesses to require customers to wear masks or other face coverings while on the premises of the business.”
The object of the bill is clearly that the Governor will need to go to the GA for such a requirement. That approaches is my own position. I recommend that a Governor be given that authority for only 30 days in a declared emergency unless the General Assembly physically cannot meet before the end of 30 days.
-
Northam declared a COVID state of emergency on Jan. 10. The duration of the order was 30 days. So Gov. Youngkin issued his order during that state of emergency. May not matter, but a fun fact nonetheless.
-
-
-
Since masks don’t work, save money. The next time you need surgery, just tell ’em to skip the mask, scrubs, and gloves. Hell, bound to be an old wet-finger dentist in your area. You save money twice a year and start immediately.
-
Meanwhile anti-maskers have taken to publicly heckling students who speak in favor of mask mandates at school board meetings. Showing their true nature… https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e882ee92d9f2743d470d197afa4b984f66291c532126e89d8c2305915d5590f2.jpg
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.