Breathless and Giddy

Jim, I’ve just read your New Man, New Ideas piece in this week’s Bacon’s Rebellion e-zine. You sound breathless and almost giddy at the potential of Governor-elect Kaine to integrate your long-advocated transportation solutions into state policy. Your picture even has the Tim Kaine eyebrow thing!

Wait a minute.

None of these new policy initiatives were debated during the campaign–there was no time, what with Hitler and all. They’ve barely been debated on these pages, except between Risse and Hyde. As you note, toward the end of the campaign, Kaine suddenly unveiled “growth curb” language and not much else. A lot of these ideas, when commuters learn about them, will not be greeted with instant enthusiasm. A lot of the ideas are very long-range and hold no real promise of relief anytime soon.

Let’s see how these regional meetings go before you get too carried away. Will these ideas be presented at the meetings or will the meetings just be for a long line of speakers to sound off with their pet ideas? Are advocates of smart growth policies prepared to speak and attempt to capture the media’s attention? I’d certainly like to see Governor-elect Kaine make an affirmative case for the things you hold dear, Jim, but I wonder if he and his staff have really thought this through–or had time to think it through.


ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)




Comments


Comments

4 responses to “Breathless and Giddy”

  1. “Pulte must demonstrate that it can reduce the number of residential rush-hour trips by 47 percent and office-generated trips by 25 percent compared to comparable development at traditional, lower densities.”

    Pulte is going to demonstrate that through use of a consultant who presumably uses some model to forecast the trip savings. The way this works is that if a commuter going to work stops for coffee and dry cleaning, then that counts as three trips. But if coffee and drycleaning are available on site, and then he drives to work, it counts as one trip.

    I’m not sure this reduces congestion.

    More importantly, what happens if the projection is wrong? Will pulte let some units go vacant to decrease trip generation?

  2. Jim Bacon Avatar

    Will, I don’t know if the Kaine team has thought through the implications of its growth-control proposal. As I noted in the story, I am very concerned, that, if misused, the measure could accentuate housing shortages. However, as I argued in some detail, the proposal, if structured properly to create the right incentives, could have a very beneficial effect. Regardless, no matter how you cut it, Kaine is carrying the transportation debate in a very different direction — a direction the Mainstream Media has all but ignored.

  3. Anonymous Avatar

    Ironically, changing local land use policies might end up giving land developers more freedom to come up with varied solutions. As it stands, most localities policies so heavily favor single use development, that it becomes easy for land developers to just go with the flow.

  4. Anonymous: Dead slam right. In a recent Times article the CEO of Toll Brothers described in detail why it was that land preservation and anti growth schemes were the best thing that ever happened to Toll Brothers profits.

Leave a Reply


ADVERTISEMENT