Blogology: Will Southside Silliness Silence Vehrs?

It appears that Will Vehrs, one of Virginia’s leading bloggers (formerly of this blog) and pundits has run afoul of state politicians and local economic developers from the Martinsville and Henry County regions due to comments he made in jest for the Commonwealth Conservative weekly caption contest. Will works for one of Virginia’s economic development agencies, and on last Friday, he submitted quite a few entries, all seemingly under the auspices of good fun. Now, those jokes have quickly turned into a little tempest.

So far, many of the state’s leading bloggers and blog readers have come to Will’s defense, while acknowledging that his comments may have stung some of the more sensitive members of the “victimized” communities. Will quickly offered a heartfelt apology, but that move failed to satisfy some local leaders. Now, the stakes have been raised even more as Del. Ward Armstrong is calling for Will’s head, and others, like Sen. Roscoe Reynolds are adding fuel to the fire.

In truth, Will may have exercised questionable judgment in submitting these comments, and the fact that he contributed several dozen does not look good. But, given that the people that he poked fun at were his own colleagues, and that he apparently has done nice work for and with them, this should never have generated such a high level of controversy. It even got to the point where a noted national blog, Instapundit, picked up on the story.

How this matter plays out should be of interest to all public employees – actually all employees, period – who engage in blogging and opinion writing unrelated to their jobs. Sure, we walk a fine line, but for those of us who blog under our own names, we are simply exercising our rights and engaging in our duties as responsible citizens. One mistake, if you can even deem Will’s comments as such, should not cost him his job or his reputation. If that happens, it should send chills down the spine of all of the Commonwealth’s civil service community and the general citizenry.

The response from Del. Armstrong & Co. was uncalled for, but it is yet another demonstration of how far some politicians will go to score brownie points with constituents while casting aside notions of freedom of speech for others. It is especially troubling when the “free-speaker” (or writer in this case) in question is a public employee who was not acting in any official capacity. Del. Armstrong & Co. should remember that standing in the bully pulpit is one thing, but simply being a bully is another matter altogether.

Without a doubt, this will be a lesson for Will and for all of us in the political blogging community. I’m sure that we will all be a bit more circumspect about blogging during work hours. This should also be a lesson to all the local economic developers out there who are so focused on marketing their locales that they ignore the sometimes harsh reality of those places. The “product” is what it is, and while no one likes to be made fun of, lashing back only enhances the embarrassment for those regions. Though cooler heads may and should prevail, with General Assembly politicians taking a moment out of their busy schedule of do-nothingness to address this non-issue, this situation seems far from over.


ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)




Comments


Comments

16 responses to “Blogology: Will Southside Silliness Silence Vehrs?”

  1. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    So many seem to be missing a critical point: it’s less about bad taste or freedom of speech than it is about doing this, apparently, on state time. It seems he did this for hours. Geez.

    So, how can so-called “fiscal conservatives” defend this wasting of taxpayers’ dollars? This is certainly grounds for dismissal. He should be fired for that alone, notwithstanding his running down a part of the state he and his economic development colleagues are supposed to be helping.

  2. SouthoftheJames.com Avatar
    SouthoftheJames.com

    When employers start firing people for making personal calls, emailing friends, surfing the web, or taking a smoking break at work, then, and only then, can someone even suggest that this is a firing offense. This was no more a waste of taxpayers dollars than any of those actions.

    So, you’re suggesting that it’s not proper to make jokes about colleagues or their places of work. I assume that nearly everyone in West Virginia who works with anyone outside of that state should request that they be fired for telling WV jokes also.

    This is just political correctness run amok.

  3. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    As one that lives in Henry Co. I think Ward Armstrong and Roscoe Reynolds should remember what it is like to lose a job. Look at the area. Leave this alone and try to attract industry so people can get a job. Are you afraid of hearing the truth? The working class of people are not offended but you both have jobs that I believe the taxpayers are paying part of the salary. Move on and leave this man alone. We need positive attention as we have had enough NEGATIVE attention.

  4. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    Ward Armstrong needs to get a life.

  5. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    This was not making a mere phone call or logging on to order a CD. Check the times — he did this for hours on end! And if you go back and look at his other posts, you’ll see that the often spends a good deal of his day going to blogs and posting. Is he addicted? If so, get the guy some help. Better yet: can him, and he’ll have plenty of time to get help on his own.

  6. Jim Duncan Avatar
    Jim Duncan

    This is a relevant article from the WSJ that discusses the new rules on web surfing.

  7. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    Conaway –

    Will is a STATE EMPLOYEE using STATE equipment on STATE time to blog….and blog…..and blog….and blog.

    Sure, he is a bright, articulate, witty guy who can write — that is why is is so popular within the blogging community.

    But the REAL issue is not WHAT he writes, the REAL issue is the TIME and PLACE and FREQUENCY of his postings.

    Put yourself in his supervisor’s position — is this really what you would want your employee to do doing during office hours?

    I think, by the way, that Will acknowledges this in his apology.

  8. SouthoftheJames.com Avatar
    SouthoftheJames.com

    Even excepting your argument, what Will did is cause for a reprimand, not firing. Also, he’s a STATE EMPLOYEE as you emphasize, which means that he’s protected by rules and regulations governing ending his employment.

    You seem to have a particularly harsh vendetta against Will as your comments and sense of outrage are somewhat vigorous. Could it be that you disagree with Will’s writing so much that you want to see him suffer the personal loss of his job?

    That you choose to write anonymously, esp. calling for the man’s firing or serious disciplinary action, as opposed to Will who writes openly, is starting to appear like a sign of COWARDICE on your part. At wrong as Del. Armstrong & Co. were, at least they didn’t hide behind anonymity as you have chosen. If you choose to keep your identity a secret for reasons related to your own employment, then it would be interesting to see what would happen if you were revealed.

  9. SouthoftheJames.com Avatar
    SouthoftheJames.com

    I meant “accepting,” not “excepting.”

  10. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    Conaway –

    First, I only posted at 9:50 as ANON.

    Second, I am a self-employed person with no connection to state governemnt who chooses to post as ANON for my own personal reasons. For you to make gratuitous, personal attacks on someone’s motivations simply because that individual posts as ANON is beneath you.

    Third, when — in my one and only post at 9:50 — did I say Will should be fired? When did I say he should even be disciplined? For the record, I don’t know Will, have never met him, but have enjoyed his writings for quite some time.

    What do believe is that the state does have the responsiblity to its employees to enact policies and procedure regarding internet usage in this regard. If there are such policies in place and Will violated them, then he should be treated as any other worker in state governemnt would be treated.

    Is that really too unreasonable?

  11. bubberette Avatar
    bubberette

    I’m a state employee and beyond that, an employee in general. I think I’ve posted here once, after working hours.

    This tempest in a teapot should give not just public employees, but all employees something to think about. I read blogs on the Internet during my lunch hour and might e-mail a friend or order Mother’s Day flowers at work. There’s a line between casual and abusive and we should each think about where we fall.

    Should public employees be held to a different standard than other employees in terms of how they spend each minute of the work day? That’s a discussion worth having.

    Public employees are certainly entitled to have and express opinions. But there are gradations.

    In my opinion, public employees in career policy-making positions should strive to be honest brokers. On the federal level this is what the Hatch Act is intended to do, as well as protect public employees from political meddling and extortion. With that in mind, I wouldn’t work on a campaign or give money to a candidate. Others may feel differently, but as a public employee my motto is “live by the sword, die by the sword”.

    But the guy working in the VDOT mapping department or staffing the IT help desk should be free to participate in politics however he or she sees fit — on their own time. If your job is to market the distressed areas of the state, it’s probably a bad career move to poke fun at them in a public forum.

    I hope Mr. Vehrs doesn’t lose his job over this. I don’t share his political views, but I respect his right to have them. But Dooood — have them on your own time.

  12. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    It’s been months and months since I signed anything after being forcefully reminded I had to worry about my own livelihood. Nobody in Virginia politics has a sense of humor anymore, or the ability to stand any kind of disagreement or criticism, even if carefully padded. (And padding wasn’t my style). I’m stunned Will went this long without drawing more fire. He has my sympathy. He should do all this on a computer he owns (as I have always done.) The Silenced Blogger Formerly Known As Steve Haner.

  13. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    There are three issues here. One is the content in general, which doesn’t bother me, because I believe in the First Amendment. The bloggers seem mostly wrapped up in this. It is of no moment.

    The second is the content in the context of a self-described economic development professional. Clearly, not a smart idea — he admitted it. Some would call it bonehead, but we’re all boneheads on any given day.

    The third is the use of state-owned computers while he was on the clock. There is a state employment policy that forbids anything other than “incidental and occasional personal use” but forbids it altogether if it interferes with the user’s productivity or work performance.

    This is the most troublesome. Vehrs is a prolific blogger during work hours. That’s more than “incidental and occasional.” Some could call it serial. He’s been repeatedly called on it by comments in various blogs and basically his response was to get lost. He still, apparently, hasn’t gotten it.

    He has defended his blogging by saying he had nothing to do and was bored. Fine. Either put your creative talents to doing something extra, or find a new job.

    Any employer in our pro-business, employment-at-will state could fire him on the spot and be entirely justified by it.

    Judging by the reaction of the blogging community, one could be led to believe that his firing would be akin to the McCarthy hearings.

    I have read his apologies. I could live with any outcome. But the blogging community needs to get a serious grip, or move to France, where they actually believe in lifetime employment.

  14. Andrea Epps Avatar
    Andrea Epps

    Conway-
    Well said.
    I loath the concept of the anonymous post. They encourage one to say something they don’t have the nerve to admit. The definition of cowardice.

    Will-
    Although I have not read all of the posts related to this, I must ask you to continue to do what you do. Those who know you and appreciate your work, knowledge, and willingness to be open will continue to do so. Those that don’t…hell with em! (I am exercising my freedom of speech!)

  15. SouthoftheJames.com Avatar
    SouthoftheJames.com

    Anon 9:50/2:27: As you said, you only made one post, thus my critique doesn’t apply to you, per se. How was I to know you were a different person? However, the other 2 anonymous posts both called for his firing, and as such I fully stand behind my comments about their cowardice. In the future, I would suggest that you use a pseudonym or something as to not be caught up in such matters, as there is really no way for me or anyone else to distinguish between your posts without analyzing language/syntax distinctions (short of tracing your comment…I’m not a techie so that’s not my forte). Frankly, that is not something that I have neither the time, nor energy to engage in.

  16. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    Vehrs is crazy, first blogging under his REAL NAME while he’s suppose to be working is bad enough. and for us that work in government, we often cringe at the idea of overtly promoting your personal poltical thoughts. bad move, plus he technically suppose to be working to help the people he made fun of..double whammy!

    we all play around and kill time on the net at work, but as you can tell from this post, I’m not about to let you know who I am..

    bad, bad judgement, by they way Vehrs, get to work, you no better than those guys contracted by VDOT sitting around watching one guy work…

Leave a Reply


ADVERTISEMENT