Yours truly was quoted by The Washington Post as asking how Scott Beardsley, new president of the University of Virginia, differs from former president Jim Ryan when it comes to his commitment to Diversity, Equity & Inclusion. The Post also quoted my comrade in arms Stu Smith, a popular conservative social media poster, as calling Beardsley a DEI ideologue. And it quotes Joel Gardner, president of the Jefferson Council, as withholding judgment on Beardsley, suggesting that he promoted DEI at the Darden School when he was dean because it’s what he had to do to survive.

I think the reporter Dan Rosenzweig-Ziff represented everyone’s position fairly (although I made it extremely clear to him that I was not speaking with any authority on Beardsley’s appointment). My problem is not with Rozenzweig-Ziff but the headline. If you’re quoting two conservatives on social media questioning the logic of Beardsley’s record on DEI, and quoting one conservative withholding judgment, and that’s all you’ve got, it’s insane to have a headline suggesting that a conservative “backlash” is “brewing.”

If there’s a story, it’s that Beardsley’s selection as UVA president has prompted so little questioning by conservatives. The “backlash” is nonexistent. But that wouldn’t have made a very exciting headline. — JAB