AVs, Pedestrians, and Human Perversity


ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)




Comments


Comments

9 responses to “AVs, Pedestrians, and Human Perversity”

  1. CrazyJD Avatar

    Many European cities already use permanent fencing in many places to keep folks on the sidewalk. The only place to cross is at intersections. Hell, New York City has lots of its streets barricaded this way with lots of those movable interlocking barricades used for crowd control.

    1. I recall seeing fencing at busy intersections in London, too.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        Y’all are forgetting that autonomous cars is one side of the technology and connected cars is another side of the technology connected cars will be talking to devices like lights and pedestrian Crossing and things like that that will basically direct the car to stop and let pedestrians cross when they need to cities will be set up to make the streets safer for pedestrians by directing cars to stop. crazy will hate this for sure!

  2. idiocracy Avatar
    idiocracy

    Yea, the same VDOT that can’t coordinate two traffic lights 500 feet from each other is going to implement connected vehicle technology?

    You crawl before you walk. VDOT hasn’t even gotten out of the crib.

  3. idiocracy Avatar
    idiocracy

    All this talk about self-driving cars and WMATA hasn’t even gotten self-driving trains working.

    Wow. Look at that. I trashed both VDOT and WMATA today.

  4. Gee, all the comments under the previous post belong here, too. DJR, you’ve already mentioned Richard Florida’s tabulation of where the private investment concentrations are, and asked LG why those locations shine so; obviously there is access to the financial community and several notable institutions of higher education, but what about where all those wealthy executives want to live? It was Richard Florida who predicted the Baltimore to Richmond corridor was our collective urban future (https://www.baconsrebellion.com/40663-2/). Isn’t urban walkability one of the prized values Richmond and Washington, and potentially Baltimore, have to offer to attract new investment and new residents? Are we starting down a transportation path here that will differentially harm Richmond’s potential future?

  5. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Autonomous vehicles, once calibrated for pedestrians and bikers are going to be far less a threat to them – far less than human-driven vehicles and that distinction will be well noted with a strong advocacy that everyone – all humans be held to the same statistics as autonomous and connected vehicles have; in other words about 1/100 the kill rate of human drivers…

    yeah – you’ll still be able to drive your own car – but the rules for having accidents.. especially involving pedestrians and bikers will be much tighter.

    people who hit pedestrians and bikers will be considered similar to drunk drivers… since we’ll know that “programmed” cars kill far, far fewer of ped and bike.

    There was a time when drunk driving was considered just an awful “accident”.

    All of that changed… and I predict we’ll see something similar with accidents involved peds and bikes after we see that autonomous vehicles rarely kill bikers and peds.We’re not there yet – but we will be , as soon as the programmers get the software better calibrated.

  6. You make an interesting argument, LG. Not only will the pattern of driving “accidents” change with automation, but also our views on the culpability of old-fashioned drivers for their mistakes. Computers don’t drive while drunk, or impaired due to drugs, or tired, or even distracted. Today, we put up with a certain amount of that as simply human nature; but with autonomy always available, perhaps we should consider how our views on the failings of human control of a vehicle will change. Perhaps not so subtly we will find human control reduced to second best, something that’s risky and a contributing factor in assigning blame for accidents, something to be avoided if possible. I think this attitudinal change will go way beyond the risk to pedestrians and bicyclists.

  7. idiocracy Avatar
    idiocracy

    The code is still written by humans, who may have done such while drunk, or impaired due to drugs, or tired, or distracted–or just plain incompetent.

    Have any of you ever heard of the Therac 25?

    If not–Google it.

Leave a Reply


ADVERTISEMENT