Are Nonchalant Adults Responsible For School Shootings?
Share this article
ADVERTISEMENT
(comments below)
Comments
Comments
13 responses to “Are Nonchalant Adults Responsible For School Shootings?”
-
Totally agree with Kerry’s take OMG!
AND, here is an example of a prosecutor who actually DID prosecute!
-
Unfortunately, I have this sinking feeling this will be the defense. “Gee, I have kids bringing guns in all the time, so didn’t think this case was any different than so many others.”
-
I suspect others will be implicated also. I doubt seriously Parker was the only one who knew about this kid …….
-
It’s possible she was the only one who knew about the kid who was in a position with the authority to do something about him.
-
-
-
-
“This allegedly nonchalant attitude toward the safety of students and teachers was almost deadly. Had the gun not jammed after the little monster fired the first shot, he might had gotten off seven more rounds.”
Mentally disturbed children are not monsters they are mentally disturbed children, who should be receiving proper care and supervision.
With that being stated, anyone who facilitates a minor, either through acts of negligence or intention should be given due process in accordance with the crimes that minor committed and in which aspects they can be held legally liable.
-
8 felonies seems like a lot. But, there were several negligent acts, and perhaps more we have not heard about, so at least several were appropriate. We should learn more when the case goes to trial.
-
https://www.baconsrebellion.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Full-Report-2024-opt-NN-Shooting.pdf
There is the grand jury report. I put it on Bacon’s server. It is absolutely chilling. It needs to be widely read and disseminated. It should be a movie. “Dr.” Parker deserves company in the defendant’s dock. Hid in her office, she did, with the teacher bleeding outside her door. Damn good thing the little murderer didn’t have a hair trigger. “Nonchalant” is a very kind word choice.
-
I wonder which school awarded her a PhD.
-
peter principle or DEI or…….. ?
In our area, assistant principles are more on the the responsibility of managing student discipline and maintaining the learning environment in classrooms, etc than on the administrative/instruction side.
I note they apparently did not have a school resource officer (and perhaps did not need except for that one child?)
-
Curiously there seems to be little information about where she was educated.
-
-
-
It’s even worse than I imagined.
And I would not describe “Doctor” Parker as nonchalant. In my opinion. her actions are the epitome of active, malicious, incompetence and/or malfeasance.
-
Seems the grand jury agrees with you. It is certainly worse than nonfeasance.
Here’s the grand jury report: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/04/10/us/virginia-shooting-special-grand-jury-report.html
Section IV starting on page 19 describes Parker’s criminal acts.
Among other things she was “So gross, wanton, and culpable to show a gross disregard for human life.”
-
-
The last report I saw indicated the child who did the shooting is now in the custody of his great grandfather. This gives me some hope for his future. It is indeed sad that the court had to reach back three generations to find a guardian.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.