Un-Cancel Robert E. Lee

by Gibson Kerr

Cancel culture is all about tearing things down. It is inherently destructive. It builds nothing. It creates nothing. It only destroys.

Robert E. Lee

Like the Vandals who destroyed Rome, cancel culture is destroying American culture. Systematically, it targets and eliminates America’s heroes. It is fueled by anger, bitterness, envy, and vindictiveness.

It is the same mean-spirited mindset that led French revolutionaries to reject their past, create a new calendar starting with Year Zero, and execute thousands of their fellow citizens.

The widespread growth of cancel culture in America, with its unforgiving intolerance of all things past, instills a sense of terror—particularly in young people—that they too may be cancelled for expressing dissenting opinions. This leads to massive self-censorship, the absolute squashing of debate and civil discourse, and ultimately to the suppression of free and creative thinking.

Cancel culture rejects the Western and Christian notions of grace, forgiveness, and reconciliation. In its place, it promotes violence, terror, intimidation, intolerance, and retribution.

Cancel culture follows Saul Alinsky’s infamous Rules for Radicals, particularly his rule to “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” It is now embedded in modern political discourse.

But it extends beyond politics. It reaches into the depths of our cultural identity to erase our traditions, our beliefs—particularly our religious beliefs—and the men and women who established our uniquely successful American culture. A culture, by the way, that is unsurpassed in human history in terms of liberty, innovation, and high standards of living.

Andrew Breitbart said that politics are downstream from culture. Now, after decades of the Marxists’ long march through the institutions—from academia to the media, entertainment, organized religion, and even the military and Corporate America—our culture has grown increasingly hostile toward the past.

As an alumnus of Washington and Lee University, I watched with utter dismay as the University’s leadership effectively erased Robert E. Lee from campus in the aftermath of George Floyd’s death in 2020. Lee, who served as president of then-Washington College over the last five years of his life from 1865 to 1870, saved the impoverished school after the Civil War. He directed the construction of Lee Chapel, where he worshipped daily and where he located his office. The mortal remains of Lee and his entire family now rest in a crypt beneath the beautiful Recumbent Lee statue.

Disregarding Lee’s critical role in making W&L one of the top universities in the country, the cancellers targeted Lee Chapel, renaming it “University Chapel.” They removed historic portraits of Lee and George Washington, along with historic plaques referencing Lee in the chapel and elsewhere on campus. They literally built a wall to hide Recumbent Lee. They cancelled Founders’ Day, which for generations had honored George Washington and Robert E. Lee, and they removed images of Lee and Washington from diplomas.

The disgraceful erasure of Lee on the campus of W&L prompted me to write my new book, Un-Cancel Robert E. Lee, An Open Letter to the Trustees of Washington and Lee University, which was published this year by Bombardier Books.

The cancelling of Robert E. Lee is a classic example of the radical assault on America’s heroes. Lee was widely hailed as one of America’s greatest examples of noble character as recently as twenty or thirty years ago. He was exalted for his virtue, his devotion to duty, his sense of honor, his Christian faith, his courage, and his flawless, gentlemanly conduct.

Then the haters came for him. Cancel culture picked Lee as its target, using Alinsky’s tactics. It froze him, personalized him, and polarized him.

Cancel culture demands perfection of historical figures. But we know that human perfection is unrealistic. And they know it, too. They’re not interested in hailing any heroes of perfection because—with the exception of Jesus Christ—no such heroes exist.

They simply want to destroy Lee and other similar heroes. And they won’t stop with Lee. They’ve already targeted George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Christopher Columbus, and countless others.

Yet the destructive wave of cancel culture only creates a void. It leaves an emptiness and an absence of heroes and noble examples for our children and grandchildren to emulate. Who or what does cancel culture propose to fill that void?

Lee deserves to be viewed in the context of his times. And in his time, he would be considered one of the more enlightened Americans for his views of slavery and blacks.

Are the sanctimonious proponents of cancel culture so morally superior that they would have behaved differently or held modern views on race if they lived 150 years ago? How do they think their descendants will view them in 150 years for their tolerance of slave labor in China to make iPhones, or child labor in Africa to mine rare earth minerals for EVs, and the destruction to the planet from their wasteful consumption? Some people need to get off their moral high horses.

Our task today is to expose cancel culture for what it is: an angry, intolerant, vindictive, and destructive attack on the heroes, values, and traditions that made America great.

And we must un-cancel Robert E. Lee by restoring him to his rightful place of honor in the pantheon of American heroes.

Gib Kerr is the author of Un-Cancel Robert E. Lee, An Open Letter to the Trustees of Washington and Lee University and States of Rebellion. Visit www.gibkerr.com.

Un-Cancel Robert E. Lee is available now on Amazon.

 


ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)




Comments


Comments

43 responses to “Un-Cancel Robert E. Lee”

  1. William O'Keefe Avatar
    William O'Keefe

    It is hard intellectual work to view Lee in context and to understand him. President Eisenhower may have said it best in a letter to a critic of Lee. "From deep conviction, I simply say this: a nation of men of Leeโ€™s calibre would be unconquerable in spirit and soul. Indeed, to the degree that present-day American youth will strive to emulate his rare qualities, including his devotion to this land as revealed in his painstaking efforts to help heal the Nationโ€™s wounds once the bitter struggle was over, we, in our own time of danger in a divided world, will be strengthened and our love of freedom sustained."

    1. David Wojick Avatar
      David Wojick

      Elegant.

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        Re-reading Shelby Foote this summer. It's July 2, 1863, and the guns are now silenced on Day Two of Gettysburg. One, and I think both, of the Shufflebargers (cousins to my direct ancestor) in the 4th Virginia were wounded that day (Foote leaves them out for some reason.) Elsewhere, the noose is tight around Vicksburg. Yes, remember Lee, but remember what a horrible, horrible tragedy that very avoidable war was. I'd admire him more if he had accepted the Union command he was offered. His genius for war and his stubborn refusal to face the inevitable killed a hundred thousand Americans or more. Has any general killed more Americans? Not the history you want to face.

        1. David Wojick Avatar
          David Wojick

          Generals do not start wars and Lee only commanded one army. But very avoidable is a very strong claim. How does that work?

          1. Stephen Haner Avatar
            Stephen Haner

            So it is your opinion that bloody war was unavoidable? Inevitable? But in truth Grant would rival Lee for a butcher's bill, certainly. If not taught as a cautionary tale, I don't see the point. Lee certainly never wanted the failed rebellion to be celebrated as some now do.

  2. St. Petersburg was renamed Stalingrad after the leftists took over. nothing new.

    1. St. Petersburg became Leningrad after the leftists took over.
      The city that became Stalingrad was Tsaritsyn. (It's now Volgograd.)

      But technicalities aside, you are right. Nothing remains the same after leftists take over.

      1. Chip Gibson Avatar
        Chip Gibson

        Or perhaps not, Sir. The day will arrive…one day, a reviving crusade to recover righteousness will occur and the higher truths will again reign above the current filth. There stands Jackson like a stone wall. They have destroyed the statues, but that wall continues to stand, being intangible as it was in 1861 – it stands.

  3. Carter Melton Avatar
    Carter Melton

    It is the same down through the ages…….we never really learn the lessons History tries to teach us, and consequently human nature never changes….with one exception: the great American experiment.

    The Founding Fathers created a political structure designed to save us from both ourselves and the tyranny they saw in Europe. Today jabbering know-nothings look through the lens of presentism and delight in finding every fault and pimple on men and women whose shoes they couldn't carry from one side of the room to the other.

    The gaggle of useful idiots who hate America couldn't divide us along economic lines because free-market capitalism created an unparalleled standard of living and lifted millions and millions out of poverty. So they have capitalized on the issue of slavery and racism (certainly America's horrible blemish) to sow destruction. Their actions….both intellectual and physical… have demonstrated neither the plan nor desire to constructively finish the build-out of an America that works for everyone. They pray only at the alter of arrogance, ignorance, and destruction.

    Your beloved W&L and its exceptional next door neighbor, were simply in the way. "Off with their heads "!

  4. David Wojick Avatar
    David Wojick

    We need to rename the Uni. Since Lee Chapel became Uni Chapel maybe University University? UU make the stupidity obvious. Or how about No History Unversity? Go NHI.

  5. walter smith Avatar
    walter smith

    It is time, to be totally frank, to grow a pair.
    The cancellations need to be undone. Then cancel the abortionists. Presently. People fighting to kill babies. Then maybe the Leftists will "shut the front door." They need to be smacked in the mouth. When there are consequences for their never-ending cultural aggression, they will stop until they see weakness. Appeasement does not work. Man up and denounce their evil acts. They will call you names – big deal. They are still wrong, and – censor me for saying the truth – in the service of evil.

  6. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    โ€œCancel culture demands perfection of historical figuresโ€

    Well, donโ€™t know about โ€œcancel cultureโ€ but I donโ€™t demand any such thing of โ€œhistorical figuresโ€. They are historical meaning they are what they are. All I ask is that we donโ€™t build memorials to people who waged a war against our (and their own) country and killed some 300,000 Americans so that they could continue to enslave other human beings. But that is asking too much from the Rightโ€ฆ alasโ€ฆ.

    Good luck with your bookโ€ฆ thanks for the advertโ€ฆ.

    1. Randy Huffman Avatar
      Randy Huffman

      I have at least one ancestor who fought for the Union, and am proud he was a part of the fight to free slaves, but donโ€™t look at it the way you do. I look at it as the war between the States. I look at it as Lee defending his beloved State, Virginia. Lee put his life and reputation on the line for Virginia, itโ€™s heartbreaking to see Virginia walk away from him.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        A significant number of Virginians remained loyal to the Union. By no means was being a traitor to oneโ€™s country a requirement of being a Virginian. And just because we are not preserving Lost Cause memorials to Lee does not mean he will not be remembered in history. He clearly will be but maybe as a human and not a messiah.

  7. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    Well, what do you make of this Mr. Dick? He is still there. The Halifax County monument in front of the courthouse. I didn't know the original monument was discarded and reordered. He came south as a Yankee wearing a US belt buckle. Knocked over once by a storm but replaced. Not far away is St. Marks Church. The preacher behind the construction of that building married Abe Lincoln and Mary Todd. And down the street from that is M.M. Bethune High School. It began in 1827 as a boarding school for blacks and turned into one of the top segregated high schools in Virginia. The juxtaposition is necessary to understand where we came from.
    https://www.hmdb.org/m.asp?m=30976
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b434ba68caf073f510f8774a3276a1d48d43407d4b330f031440d26cb96f6403.jpg

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Oh yes. I realize that Halifax County still has its Confederate statute. The original statue was banished to Heeba Shepherd's pasture when it was discovered it was wearing a Yankee uniform. I used to cut the grass around it.

      I was confused by your reference to St. Mark's Church. Only after I did some searching did I discover that what I know as the Halifax Methodist Church was originally St. Mark's Episcopal Church. It did not take long for the Episcopalians to outgrow that small church, so they built a bigger church next door and called it St. John's, rather than St. Mark's. Your knowledge of local Virginia hisory constantly amazes me.

      As far as Mary Bethune High School is concerned, being one of the top segregated high schools in the state was a low bar to clear. That building is now the Mary Bethune Complex and houses many county offices.

    2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Oh yes. I realize that Halifax County still has its Confederate statute. The original statue was banished to Heeba Shepherd's pasture when it was discovered it was wearing a Yankee uniform. I used to cut the grass around it.

      I was confused by your reference to St. Mark's Church. Only after I did some searching did I discover that what I know as the Halifax Methodist Church was originally St. Mark's Episcopal Church. It did not take long for the Episcopalians to outgrow that small church, so they built a bigger church next door and called it St. John's, rather than St. Mark's. Your knowledge of local Virginia hisory constantly amazes me.

      As far as Mary Bethune High School is concerned, being one of the top segregated high schools in the state was a low bar to clear. That building is now the Mary Bethune Complex and houses many county offices.

      1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead

        In the 1920s Bethune was sending nearly half of their graduates to college. The teachers were paid about 25 dollars a month. https://www.oldhalifax.com/county/MaryBethune.htm
        Pittsylvania, Halifax, and Mecklenburg are so rich in history. While giving a tour of Historic Kenmore in Fredericksburg, I met the son of Howard Robinson. Long time teacher and guidance counselor of East End High School. Heard some great stories of how just a few educators could make an impactful influence on students and inspire them to greater things. Mr. Robinson just passed at the age of 102.

  8. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    I grew up studying the Civil War, including Robert E. Lee. Are you saying that the idea that the Confederacy was fighting to preserve slavery is "an alternative truth"?

    1. walter smith Avatar
      walter smith

      Come on. Saying that the only reason the War was fought was to end slavery is an alternative truth. Many factors. Quite complicated. Was โ€œwinningโ€ the War and saying, โ€œOK former slaves, good luckโ€ a good way to end slavery? Many starved in the aftermath. Is it a thought crime to think that slavery would have died in 20 years or so and maybe a better outcome all around would have been achieved? Where are you Commie โ€œgive peace a chanceโ€ types?
      Slavery was on the way out. โ€œSlave leasingโ€ in Virginia was a recognition that the plantation system was on the way out and a small step towards freedom. The Baptist church in the 1790s said slavery was wrong, but it was up to the legislature to end it.
      Lee was a tragic figure. I am not trying to offend you, but I would ask how you would have fared in his shoes. All you criticsโ€ฆ and if you support baby killing, you have no basis whatsoever to judge him. Something about, lemme see, โ€œfor the measure you give will be the measure you getโ€ฆโ€ Somebody important said that I think.

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        The worst lies are the lies we tell ourselves. It was slavery, slavery and slavery. No other reason for all the death and destruction and decades of discord. The rich getting richer off of slavery. Eric Larson's new "Demons of Unrest" is worth a read, but you won't like it.

      2. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        The worst lies are the lies we tell ourselves. It was slavery, slavery and slavery. No other reason for all the death and destruction and decades of discord. The rich getting richer off of slavery. Eric Larson's new "Demons of Unrest" is worth a read, but you won't like it.

        1. walter smith Avatar
          walter smith

          You can believe that. You won’t be right. But you can believe it.
          But let’s accept your (false) premise that the entire reason for the Civil War/War Between the States was to end slavery.
          Was that the best way to end slavery? Were there better ways to have ended slavery?
          And if the haters of anybody suggesting less than total nobility for the winning side and something more than abject evil for the losing side, where is your current moral outrage over abortion and child trafficking in our own country and the slavery around the world and particularly in China?

        2. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          And the defenders of slavery continued their Jim Crow assault on black folks for more than a century after the war which included erecting lost cause "memorials", naming schools and roads for "lost cause" defenders of slavery and segregationists, denial of voting, owning property, receiving a public education, and more.

      3. Chip Gibson Avatar
        Chip Gibson

        Superbly stated, Sir – eloquent truth as well as poignant reality. The question which ends most debate on the subject, "how would you have fared?".

    2. Chip Gibson Avatar
      Chip Gibson

      Two Facts: President Lincoln did not, by his own platform and declaration, invade Virginia in order to free the slaves. He did so to retaliate against South Carolina and to “restore the Union”. The institution of slavery was a prominent divide between the States, prior and during the war; however, it itself was not the whole divide between “North and South” and was not the whole cause for secession and eventual war. Emancipation was a convenient (and fortuitous, eventually) tool used by President Lincoln to regain support for his failing War Against the South.

      I just spent the week working in New Jersey, where slavery was active well into 1865, as it was in Delaware; New Jersey, where the 13th Amendment was rejected. Did President Lincoln invade New Jersey and Delaware? Maryland was a slave state into 1864, but was not included in the Emancipation Proclamation….those slaves were not emancipated…why not? Why was Maryland not invaded? Slavery was legal in Washington DC when President Lincoln invaded Virginia…nearly 1,000 slaves there in the district where he did reside in our White House. A year later he used tax dollars to buy those DC slaves and free them…to “resolve his hypocrisy”, while slavery continued a couple of miles away in Maryland…

      So, you ask if the Confederacy was fighting to preserve slavery? The vast majority of officers and soldiers serving in the Confederate Army did not own slaves. Why then, give up their lives to defend that institution.? No, the major of those who led and served did so to defend their homes and States Rights (as prescribed by the Constitution). The end of Slavery was the one jewel of that tragic war, but not why it was initiated or fought predominantly.

  9. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Who wants to memorialize, in public spaces, the guys who enslaved the ancestors of modern day descendants who now walk those public spaces?

    Who wants a school named for the guy who enslaved the ancestors of the kids attending that school?

    Why should anyone care about their inability to be sensitive to others history and heritage?

    1. Turbocohen Avatar
      Turbocohen

      So, you would have opposed slavery 150 years ago? I call BS. Democrats supported slavery.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        Do you think there was no opposition to slavery 150 years ago and a war was fought even though no opponents? WHO do you think WERE opponents ?

        And it’s not just the way. It’s what was done to black folks AFTER the war for more than 100 years – by
        some of the same folks who fought FOR slavery.

        1. Turbocohen Avatar
          Turbocohen

          The persistence of slavery is rooted in significant opposition to individual liberty in pursuit of ill gotten gains. Washington warned us to remain unified, resist the rise of political factions and avoid the influence of foreign powers who have recombined their efforts to enslave a new generation of Chinese and African laborers.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            I see slavery and Jim Crow as two separate but related wrongs against an entire race of people.

            The first can be argued as a widespread practice of the times in many places worldwide , the second is uniquely American and equally bad as slavery itself and took more than 100 years of further "fighting" to roll most of it back.

            Freed Slaves were denied equal rights by some of the same folks who supported slavery and proceeded to erect "memorials" to the "lost cause" and slavery.

      2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        150 years ago, todayโ€™s Democrats would not have been Democrats in the South. Todayโ€™s Southern Republicans would have been.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          But how can that be? Those unwilling to change must first assume that life is static.

      3. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        It is unlikely he would have been a Democrat. Isnโ€™t making that assumption called โ€œPresentismโ€?

    2. Turbocohen Avatar
      Turbocohen

      So, you would have opposed slavery 150 years ago? I call BS. Democrats supported slavery.

  10. Turbocohen Avatar
    Turbocohen

    Its called Humility and sacred honor.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      So you would violate it? Why? Itโ€™s for his own good?

  11. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    โ€œThe Only Thing That Is Constant Is Changeโ€ โ€• Heraclitus

  12. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    And this guy's on the US penny and $5 bill?

    Four days before his death, speaking to Gen. Benjamin Butler, Lincoln still pressed on with deportation as the only peaceable solution to Americaโ€™s race problem. โ€œI can hardly believe that the South and North can live in peace, unless we can get rid of the negroes โ€ฆ I believe that it would be better to export them all to some fertile countryโ€ฆโ€

    https://prologue.blogs.archives.gov/2010/12/01/lincoln-to-slaves-go-somewhere-else/#:~:text=In%20April%201862%2C%20Lincoln%20was,of%20the%20DC%20Emancipation%20Act.

  13. Chip Gibson Avatar
    Chip Gibson

    Precisely…..as President Lincoln actually did in DC during April, 1862….so very embarrassing to watch slaves pass by in front of the White House while losing a war in the South to "end slavery". There is clear enough proof, there in that single act by President Lincoln, to refute the claim that he invaded Virginia a year prior…in order to "end slavery".

    1. Marty Chapman Avatar
      Marty Chapman

      Thanks for the info Chip. Imagine if Lincoln proposed a more generous “buy back” after the election and before SC seceded.

      1. Chip Gibson Avatar
        Chip Gibson

        Yes, perhaps we could have avoided that disaster of a war. Thanks.

        1. Marty Chapman Avatar
          Marty Chapman

          Extremes on both sides fanning the flames, but plenty of room for an elegant compromise. Sound familiar?

Leave a Reply


ADVERTISEMENT