By James C. Sherlock
The faculties of America’s elite universities, among which William and Mary (W&M) would eagerly self-identify, are the beating heart of the anti-American radical left in this country.
It would defy nearly impossible odds to fail to expect that some, perhaps many, of the William and Mary faculty join them.
But we taxpayers expect the Presidents and Boards of Visitors of our state-supported schools to tamp down their worst excesses.
That has not happened at W&M.
That school has ignored multiple warnings from multiple authoritative sources over the years about the dangers of partnering with the Chinese Ministry of Educationโs Confucius Institutes (CIs) and the Foreign Ministryโs Chinese Students and Scholars Associations (CSSAs).
W&M continues to support the CSSA and has transitioned the CI to a relationship with the same Chinese university.
The New York Times published investigative reports in 2012, 2017, and since then have laid out the threat in great detail.
The BBC published “Confucius institute: The hard side of China’s soft powerโ in 2014.
The American Association of University Professors in 2014 warned in On Partnerships with Foreign Governments: The Case of Confucius Institutes:
relationships with Confucius Institutes “sacrificed the integrity of the university and its academic staffโ. ย “Confucius Institutes function as an arm of the Chinese state and are allowed to ignore academic freedom. Their academic activities are under the supervision of Hanban, a Chinese state agency which is chaired by a member of the Politburo and the vice-premier of the Peopleโs Republic of China.
The U.S. โ China Security Review Commission, an agency of the U.S. government, published Chinaโs Overseas United Front Workย in August of 2018.ย Listed there under Other Organizations Involved in United Front Work are: (more…)

by Scott Lingamfelter
by Kerry Dougherty







by Joe Fitzgerald
by Kerry Dougherty


