• Six Years Later…

    Today is a day to remember the fallen and to thank those who have sailed half way around the world to defend us. Whatever we may think of the war in Iraq, we can express gratitude for the dedication of our soldiers and sailors who are sent there. In this photo, the Norfolk-based amphibious assault ship USS Kearsarge, now stationed in the Arabian Sea, pays tribute to those who perished on 9/11 and to those who have fought in defense of freedom since then.

    (Photo credit: Lt. J.R. Hoeft, Kearsarge Strike Group.)

  • Don’t Touch the Rainy Day Fund

    Is Virginia’s FY 2008 budget picture bleak enough to justify dipping into the state’s $1.3 billion rainy day fund? Apparently, Gov. Timothy M. Kaine wants to keep that option on the table. Last month the Governor announced that Virginia was facing a cash shortfall of $641 million and ordered state agencies to cut their administrative budgets by five percent. The General Assembly leadership of both houses is urging Kaine not to touch the Rainy Day Fund, which was set up to weather major emergencies like the recession of 2002.

    In the letter to the Governor, four senior Republican legislators wrote:

    Key economic indicators such as employment and wage and salary growth, while softening, appear to be in line with long-term-trend growth of a maturing economy. Unlike the recession of earlier this decade, when the state actually collected less revenue, the updated revenue forecast presented by [Finance] Secretary [Jody] Wagner indicates Virginia revenues are still experiencing growth.

    “We remain concerned that utilizing the state’s Rainy Day Fund during a non-recessionary period establishes a bad and undesirable precedent that suggests we can overspend taxpayer resources without consequence,” the legislators wrote. They offered few specifics on where Kaine should implement his spending cuts, but did urge him not to reduce state support for higher education while expanding the pre-K program, which would be “tantamount to raising tuitions on middle-class Virginians in order to launch a new initiative.”

    Kaine spokesman Kevin Hall called the letter a political stunt, reports Pamela Stallsmith with the Times-Dispatch. “While they play political games in an election year, the governor and his team are busy making difficult choices about painful cuts in services Virginians rely on.”

    Perhaps Hall didn’t like the legislators’ insinuation that the budget crunch was partly of the Kaine administration’s own making. Half the shortfall, they wrote, could be attributed to underestimating payments for the Land Preservation Tax Credit and miscalculating interest payments to the General Fund. On the other hand, Kaine deserves credit for seeking spending cuts early in the fiscal year, when cost-cutting decisions can be spread over 10 months.

    Politics aside, the legislators are right: There is no justification for tapping the Rainy Day Fund during a period of economic expansion.


  • Hey, WaPo, Try Addressing the Issues

    The Washington Post editorial page was in fine form Sunday, beaming with moral superiority as it criticized House Speaker William J. Howell for his stance on illegal immigrants. Illegal immigration is a complex issue that cuts many ways and the WaPo is more than entitled to point out flaws in Howell’s proposals. But there is no justification for accusing the Speaker and Republicans generally of “immigrant bashing,” “bigotry mongering,” and “sticking it to the culturally distinct ‘other.’”

    I don’t know the Speaker on a personal level that well, but I know others who know him, and of one thing I am certain, Bill Howell is not a bigot and he does not pander to bigots. Let’s turn the tables and show the Washington Post what it’s like to conduct an argument by ad hominem attack.

    WaPo editorial writers are so desperate for liberals and democrats to cling to power, they’ll say anything, do anything, including undermine the sovereign boundaries of the nation. Seizing the illegal immigration issue, WaPo scribblers hurl accusations of racism and bigotry against those who would uphold the rule of law, cynically goading Hispanics into the liberal/democratic camp — just as they shamefully play the race card to keep African-Americans on the liberal plantation. It’s all race-and-oppression with those hypocrites, who live in their expensive, all-white neighborhoods and work in their lily-white office complexes amidst the poverty of Washington, D.C. It’s easy to love minorities and champion their causes — as long as the riff raff doesn’t get too close.

    See how easy it is? Just impugn the other guy with the worst motives in the world. Change the subject and ignore his arguments. If that’s the way the WaPo wants to conduct the illegal immigration debate, let’s get going. Digital ink in the blogosphere is a lot cheaper than printer’s ink. But there is an alternative: Let’s all back off, take a deep breath, give our opponents the benefit of assuming they aren’t evil incarnate, and address the issues civilly.

    (Rapid dog image: The official Bacon’s Rebellion icon for the Washington Post editorial page.)

  • I-495 HOT Lane Construction Begins in Early 2008

    Construction of HOT lanes on Interstate 495, the Washington Beltway, will begin early next year and last five years, reports Karen Brulliard with the Washington Post. The $1.7 billion project will stretch 14 miles and include nine dedicated interchanges with the Beltway, including three new access points to Tysons Corner.

    The congestion tolls, which will vary by time of day, will be geared to keeping traffic flowing at optimal speeds and maximize capacity. The average trip during rush hour is expected to cost $5 to $6. Given the premium that many Northern Virginians put on their time, that’s a bargain. The four new lanes will continue to be free for buses and cars with three or more riders.

    With HOT lanes planned for Interstate 95 as well, the beginnings of a free-flowing network are coming into place. Said Pierce R. Homer, secretary of transportation: “The Capital Beltway is the busiest and most congested highway in Virginia, and we believe we have come up with an affordable solution that brings transit and HOV services to that corridor for the first time. This means that a resident, say, from Aquia Harbour in Stafford who works in Tysons Corner can pick up two neighbors and drive on a congestion-free facility all the way, or that same person can ride a bus to that location. . . . It’s a brand-new travel option.”

    But Stewart Schwartz, executive director of the Coalition for Smarter Growth, contended that the state should not have relinquished operation of the HOT lanes to a private firm. Said Schwartz: “I would argue that there really is no real private cash on the table that comes from these deals. All these contractors are doing is serving as a sort of bond agent for the state.”


  • Frosty Landon, Champion of Open Government, Retires

    Forrest “Frosty” Landon has retired… again. He first stepped down as executive editor of the Roanoke Times (where, among his other misdeeds, he helped shape me into a journalist), only to join in launching the Virginia Coalition for Open Government in 1996. There, in the words of the Sunday Roanoke Times, he “led a crusade against government secrecy on behalf of all Virginians for a decade.”

    Transparency in government once was the concern mainly of journalists and first amendment lawyers. But the rise of the blogosphere, which engages hundreds of citizen-reporters, has created a new constituency for openness. Unknown to many bloggers, Frosty and the Coalition labored tirelessly behind the scenes to halt the erosion of the Freedom of Information Act, making it one of those indispensable organizations, like the Virginia Public Access Project, that keep government honest and accountable in Virginia. (Please note who supports the Coalition — the mainstream media. We bloggers depend upon the MSM for more than news reporting.)

    Those who know Frosty will always appreciate his good cheer, his self-deprecating humor, his dedication to his craft and his zeal for transparency. Those who don’t know him would miss him, too, if they knew all that he has contributed. Frosty, thank you for a job well done. We will miss you, and hope you don’t stray too far when you enjoy a well-deserved retirement.


  • WEEKEND READING AND WRITING

    A lot of unsettling “news” as we approach 11 September but there is a WaPo item some may miss in the Travel section. “Operation Vacation” is a stinging condemnation of the US of A health care system masquerading as a way to mix surgery with sightseeing.

    Also here on Baconโ€™s Rebellion Blog the 4 Sept post “Nathaniel Bacon Vindicated, Gov. Berkeley Shamed” is not just a teaser for Richard Thorntonโ€™s column, it has accumulated further insights from Thornton and Jim Bacon.

    It looks like there is material here for a sequel here to Jared Diamondโ€™s “Guns Germs and Steel” featuring the slave trade impact on Africa, and the slave trade / demise of agricultural / trading settlements in the Southeastern USA.

    Add some details from what the English, French and Spanish did on small Caribbean Islands and the impact of Spanish horses on the Native Americans from around our home town and you have another layer of guns and germs and steel insights that rewrites what we thought we knew about European “settlement” and the “diffusion of knowledge” / civilization.

    EMR


  • Saxman the Axman: Chop Spending

    The liberal Commonwealth Institute for Fiscal Analysis projects a $1.2 billion shortfall in the state budget in the upcoming 2008-2010 state budget. The problem, according to authors Michael Cassidy and Cory Kaufman in a Times-Dispatch column today, is not excessive spending but insufficient revenue. Despite Gov. Mark R. Warner’s 2004 tax increases, they write, “Virginia never fully replaced the resources consumed by the car-tax relief effort” of the Gilmore administration.

    That’s one point of view. Then there’s the perspective laid out by Del. Chris Saxman, R-Staunton, in a counterpoint column: “Revenues to the commonwealth have increased by more than 50 percent in just three budget cycles — one of which included a recession where revenues were flat-lining to declining.”

    Perhaps Virginians should be seeking ways to curtail spending, Saxman says — not by cutting programs but “challenging ourselves to find ways to improve efficiency, thus better serving Virginia’s citizens in a more cost-effective manner.”

    Saxman suggests fully implementing the recommendations of the Wilder Commission from earlier in the decade, implementing findings of the Cost Cutting Caucus and the Kaine administration’s operational review teams, making the state budget more transparent to the public, and focusing on the drivers of state spending: Medicaid and K-12 education.

    Concludes Saxman: “Virginia’s place in the world’s dynamic economy must not be set by two-year mindsets with statist, linear and short-term thinking.”


  • Repaired Bridges: 810 since 2004, and Counting

    In the aftermath of the disastrous Minnesota bridge collapse, David Ekern, the commissioner of the Virginia Department of Transportation, weighs in on plans to upgrade the condition of state bridges. Virginia, which has always put roadway maintenance ahead of funding new projects, seems to have its priorities in the right place. In today’s Times-Dispatch Ekern writes:

    Virginia’s 2004-09 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program allocated more than $350 million in fiscal year 2004 to projects involving bridges. More than $600 million was allocated to bridge-related projects for fiscal years 2005-09 in that program. This trend has continued and has allowed us to build or rehabilitate 810 structures. …

    In the current 2008-13 Six-Year Improvement Program, more than $2.1 billion is scheduled for projects that include bridge work.

    Of course, Ekern warns, the state’s 20,823 bridges get older and the cost to repair and replace them “increase every day.”


  • Beware the Nerdocalypse

    In the course of human evolution, first came hunting-gathering, then the agricultural revolution and then the industrial revolution. Arguably, the United States has evolved into a post-industrial society, though no one seems quite sure what to call it — perhaps the knowledge economy. But what comes after that?

    The Singularity, according to entrepreneur-author Ray Kurzweil and a band of like-minded futurists. And what, pray tell, is the Singularity? Read this Associated Press article for a glimpse of what it’s all about. (I noticed this article because I just happen be reading Kurzweil’s book, “The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology.”)

    The Singularity is, like the analogous point in the gravitational well of black holes, a point of no return: a point when society changes dramatically and irreversibly. The changes are driven by the massive increases in computing power that will pack the power of today’s supercomputers onto a single chip, along with progress in reverse-engineering the human brain, the development of Artificial Intelligence, and incredible progress in the fields of genetics, nanotechnology and robotics.

    Kurzweil talks of an age of accelerating rates of return, turning traditional economics topsy turvy, as greater computational ability enables mankind to make new technological breakthroughs at an ever accelerating rate. In the singularity, which Kurzweil foresees taking place in the late 2020s, or about 20 years from now, we can expect to see the following: robots that surpass human beings in intelligence, incredibly lengthened human life spans, and robotic/nanotechnology-driven manufacturing processes that dramatically drive down the cost of producing material goods, inexhaustible supplies of cheap, clean energy.

    Kurzweil is an optimist. He is aware that there is a dark side to every beneficial advance in technology, but he is confident we can control nightmare scenarios of robots taking over the world or swarms of self-replicating nanobots consuming the face of the earth like Pharoah’s locusts. Kurzweil may well be correct that we will be seeing smart robots and 150-year life spans in my lifetime (I’m 54). But, as another futurist, Alvin Toffler observes, different human institutions evolve at different rates. The realm of science is evolving faster than any other, the world of business is close behind. But the spheres of governance, politics and law lag way behind. Indeed, at times our capacity for collective action seems almost paralyzed by gridlock. Instead of creating a world of infinite blessings, skeptics suggest, the Singularity may bring the “nerd-ocalypse.”

    What will the world be like when technology gives us super-intelligent robots, genetically altered designer babies and Methuselah lifespans but the human species remains stuck in its primate-driven lust for status and power? Talk about a social security crisis! Talk about the implications of wealth, class and differential access to resources!

    If Bacon’s Rebellion lasts that long, you can rest assured that we will be examining the consequences of the Singularity for Virginia.
    (Photo credit of Ray Kurzweil: AFB Access World.)

  • NOTES

    Larry:

    Good to have you back. I did not pay attention and did not realize how far north you were going. 200 miles west of Ft Simpson is just a few miles from the end of the earth. I suspect the forest fires have not gotten up there yet.

    While you were gone Groveton asked a question about retrofitting Great Falls to be a functional Village. We are working on a column on that topic that will address the questions your about “traditional village development” on greenfield sites.

    Groveton:

    You may have seen this but todayโ€™s WaPo on B2 there is a “Virginia Briefing” item “Group of Independents to Make Endorsements” by Sandhya Somashekhr.

    Also see note on your Great Falls question above.

    Mr. Leahy:

    Glad to see your “Castles in the Sand” column on settlement pattern issues. Keep up the good work.

    EMR


  • The Virginia Tech Lawsuits

    For once, I agree with a Roanoke Times editorial writer. What do the families of seven shooting victims killed at Virginia Tech think they can accomplish with the lawsuits they are considering?


  • Questions about the Volkswagen USA Deal

    The relocation of the Volkswagen of America corporate headquarters from a Detroit suburb to Fairfax County is an undeniable economic development coup for Virginia — Northern Virginia in particular. The deal will bring 400 high-paying jobs to the state. Average annual salary: $125,000, high even by Northern Virginia standards. Another major headquarters adds to the region’s prestige as a world-class business center. And you can’t buy the kind of press you get when CEO Stefan Jacoby says (to quote the Detroit Free Press), โ€œWe are a company of innovators and bold-thinking people who want to challenge the status quo and we know we will fit very well here.” By “here,” he meant Northern Virginia.

    But the deal does raise questions. The Commonwealth of Virginia is providing $6 million in incentives to land the $100 million investment. That’s chump change compared to what the state spends to bring industry to other parts of the state, and NoVa economic developers can justifiably argue that it’s time they get their share of state largesse.

    But here’s the rub: Does it make sense for Virginia to subsidize Volkswagen’s relocation when the creation of 400 jobs to the region’s super-heated economy can be met only by the infux of new residents to the state? According to the Virginia Employment Commission, the region’s unemployment rate stood at 2.3 percent in July. That’s not unemployment, that’s a labor shortage. (Every economy has a irreducible minimum of workers in transition — students leaving schools, moms rejoining the workforce, laid off workers transitioning to new jobs, etc.) Those 400 jobs means 400 people moving into Virginia — even more, if you include the multiplier effect created by their spending in the local economy.

    Fairfax County will enjoy a nice $100 million boost to its tax base, yielding roughly $900,000 a year in tax revenues. But where will the newcomers live? Will they live in Fairfax County? If so, what will the county incur in additional public-service obligations? Conversely, what if some VW employees choose not to live in Fairfax? How far will they have to drive to work, and how much stress will they place on an already overloaded transportation system? What will the state’s financial liability be accommodate another 400 drivers on state roads?

    Another question: Dominion Virginia Power is projecting that Northern Virginia will begin experiencing brownouts within four years. Does the state need to be subsidizing the influx of 400 more residents to put even more strain on the electric power grid?

    Look, it’s a free country. If Volkswagen USA wants to move to Virginia, that’s great. But under the current circumstances, I wonder about the wisdom of the state inducing the company to move with $6 million in subsidies. Maybe the high salaries paid to VW executives will represent a net gain to the taxpayers of Virginia. Maybe. But we don’t know. If the state has made any cost-benefit calculations, it hasn’t made them public.


  • Adjusting to Virginia’s New Demographics

    It is conventional wisdom now that the massive influx of out-of-staters, mostly northerners, into Virginia is altering the state’s political complexion — challenging the once-invincible power base of the Republican Party. House Speaker William J. Howell allowed as much when speaking yesterday at a gathering of the Virginia Foundation for Research and Economic Education.

    Howell said the state’s newest residents may not embrace the “shared values we have in Virginia,” reports Jeff Schapiro with the Times-Dispatch. The changing demographics of Virginia are “something that we have to adjust to.”

    Maybe the GOP will adapt to the changing demographics, maybe it won’t. (I shy away from predicting political outcomes.) What you can count on is that the political center of Virginia will shift left, towards larger, more activist government, whichever party remains in control. Here’s my question: Will northern-born voters bring the same values and re-create the same kind of political economy that constricted economic opportunity in their home states and brought them to Virginia? Are the attitudes of the newcomers toward the size and role of government compatible with Virginia maintaining its “Best State for Business” rating?

    Bottom line: Is Virginia’s government destined to look more like New York’s and New Jersey’s and less like North Carolina’s and Georgia’s? If so, what will that mean for our long-term prosperity?


  • Fundamental Change = New Virginia Constitution

    In the Aug. 16 edition of The New Republic, Sarah Williams Goldhagen explores the causes of America’s collapsing physical infrastructure. (You can read the first paragraph here; then you have to subscribe.) She posits a number of causes, including the difficulty in a democracy of constructing large-scale public works without trampling on peoples’ rights, and the abdication of the federal government as a funding source. But the third point she raises should be of interest to anyone familiar with Ed Risse’s call for Fundamental Change in governance structures.

    Goldhagen writes:

    The country has undergone a structural transformation from city-suburb-exurb-farmland, a constellation that does not necessarily conflict with the tripartite local-state-federal structure of government, into metropolitan regions, a constellation that does conflict with that structure. We are stuck with the existing political, legal, and institutional structures of states (usually bigger than metropolitan areas), and municipalities (smaller and self interested) through which almost everything must be organized and funneled. Neither is the right kind of entity for managing a metropolitan region, but together they inevitably organize our thinking and, more important, our policy planning, which turns out to be too unfocused (in the case of states) or too hyper-focused (in the case of municipalities).

    The recent creation of transportation authorities in Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads partially addresses the issue here in Virginia. The authorities allow the state’s two most populous metropolitan areas to address their transportation needs on a regional basis

    At this stage of development, however, there are two mega problems with the Virginia solution. First, regional transportation authorities have the power to raise taxes but are not accountable to the public in the same way that local governments are. Representatives are not elected directly, and the rules of open, transparent government do not necessarily apply.

    Secondly, because transportation and land use decision making is so closely intertwined, it should be made at the same level of government. I know that the idea of transferring land use decisions from municipal to regional governments would strike some people as a horrifying prospect. Keep government close to the people, they would argue. (A valid point, I would add.) On the other hand, the munipical government boundaries we have now are artifacts of the 19th century, devised to serve a largely agrarian economy, not the economy dominated by sprawling metropolitan areas.

    The writers of the Virginia constitution originally envisioned two types of municipality: cities to serve urban areas, which required a higher level of government services, and counties to serve rural areas. Cities were given more taxing power and legal authority, and counties less. As development spread beyond city boundaries, cities annexed the developed portions of their neighboring counties and extended urban infrastructure and services to them. The animating idea was that a single governmental entity would preside over a single urbanized area. For a variety of complex reasons, however, cities lost the right to annex. Thus, as urbanized areas grew, they came to encompass multiple jurisdictions.

    The system we have today is not what the architects of Virginia’s system of local government intended. It is time for Fundamental Change in the institutions of governance. It is time to revise the Virginia Constitution. Virginia adopted a new constitution in 1971 to reflect the new realities of the Civil Rights revolution. Thirty-six years later, it’s time our system of local government reflect the realities of 21st century human settlement patterns.


  • Fear of Men

    Jeff Zaslow’s Wall Street Journal column continues a discussion about how society is teaching kids to fear men.

    As the father of an eight year-old boy, this topic hits close to the mark, doubly so once I read Zaslow’s piece, which is based on feedback he received from readers regarding his first column on this topic. Snip:

    Frank McEnulty, a builder in Long Beach, Calif., was once a Boy Scout scoutmaster. “Today, I wouldn’t do that job for anything,” he says. “All it takes is for one kid to get ticked off at you for something and tell his parents you were acting weird on the campout.”

    It’s true that men are far more likely than women to be sexual predators. But our society, while declining to profile by race or nationality when it comes to crime and terrorism, has become nonchalant about profiling men. Child advocates are advising parents never to hire male babysitters. Airlines are placing unaccompanied minors with female passengers.

    Child-welfare groups say these precautions minimize risks. But men’s rights activists argue that our societal focus on “bad guys” has led to an overconfidence in women. (Children who die of physical abuse are more often victims of female perpetrators, usually mothers, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.)

    Coincidentally, I am now, also, the adult leader of my son’s Cub Scout Den. Before I can fully assume those duties, I must first take the BSA’s online course in child protection and in addition, I must allow the church which sponsors the Pack to conduct a background check on me to ensure that I am not a predator/scofflaw/deadbeat. If I do not give them permission to investigate me, I will not be allowed to perform any functions with the Den. Period.

    In some ways, I can appreciate the scrutiny. Screening for creeps is probably long overdue and, given the potential for legal liability, regrettably necessary.

    Still, it leaves me cold, and wondering whether all this scrutiny — however well intentioned — doesn’t reinforce the perception that all men are suspect. My son and I have a good relationship (he still calls me DaDa… at least when none of his friends are present). And he still holds my hand, whether we’re crossing the street, or simply because he feels like it.

    It’s a small, but very touching gesture. One day, he’ll stop doing it and that will be a sad day, indeed.

    But now I wonder…do others who see me holding his hand think I’m some sort of trench-coated creep who ought to be reported? Does it help that our own Attorney General has made a virtual crusade out of tracking down online predators — a crusade that’s repeatedly reinforced by a stream of breathless press releases?

    No, it doesn’t. While there can be no doubt whatsoever that depravity exists and that predators, creeps and weirdos can and have inflicted great pain on so many innocent lives, they are are distinct, deserved minority. Society has the right and the responsibility to punish them.

    But in doing so, it does not have the right to make suspects of us all.