Guest Column

Phillip Rodokanakis



A Vote for Howell...

Is a vote for higher taxes. Reston's Janet Howell , hates "big government" when it curtails abortions, but she doesn't mind raising taxes to pay for spending programs.


 

Sen. Janet D. Howell, D-Reston, has been a member of the Virginia state senate since 1992. As a member of the powerful Senate Finance Committee, one would expect to find her imprint on a number of bills impacting the Northern Virginia area.

 

Unfortunately, that doesn't appear to be the case.

 

Worse, Howell is promoting an extremist agenda that doesn't reflect the core values of her constituents. For example, she called the Boy Scouts' policy of not allowing homosexuals as scout leaders "homophobic."

 

This occurred last year in a committee debate regarding legislation that would have banned local school boards from discriminating against the Boy Scouts.

 

But then again, that's not surprising for Howell. During the debate last year on a bill that would set guidelines for posting the Ten Commandments on public school walls, she had this to say: "The thought that we would be putting this in the classroom is absolutely counter to everything I think this country stands for."

 

This year, Sen. Howell was again caught on the losing side of promoting an extremist agenda. When the Senate approved legislation requiring parental consent for minors seeking abortions, and banning partial-birth abortion, Howell was visibly upset over the passage of this bill by a bullet-proof veto majority.

 

"This bill represents big government at its most abhorrent," said Howell. "This bill promotes controlling government. It promotes intrusive government. It promotes uncompassionate government. It's government meddling at its very worst."

 

If nothing else, you have to give her credit for being consistently on the side of extreme liberalism. I'm sure our out-of-touch senator would be shocked to learn that a Feb. 2003 Gallup poll found that 70 percent of Americans favored a law that would make partial-birth abortions illegal.

 

On the other hand, what about the crucial issues affecting Sen. Howell's district? With transportation gridlock being on the mind of most Northern Virginia voters, one would expect to find a large body of legislation she sponsored in an attempt to solve our local bottlenecks.

 

Alas, that's not the case. On the contrary, her only transportation solutions involve raising our taxes.

 

In the 2000 legislative session, Howell introduced a bill calling for a motor fuels sales tax of five percent. Thankfully, even though her bill passed the Senate, it was killed in the House of Delegates.

 

Not to be silenced, Howell worked feverishly in support of raising the sales tax by 11 percent in last year's sales tax referendum. This was subsequently defeated by the voters in Northern Virginia by a 55 percent to 45 percent margin.

 

Howell has been consistent in wanting to raise our taxes. In the 2002 legislative session, she voted to authorize counties and cities in Northern Virginia to impose a local income tax of one-half of one percent, subject to a local referendum.

 

Interestingly, no local jurisdiction has opted to give voters this choice.

 

Given that real estate taxes have increased by more than 50 percent over the last four years in Fairfax County, even the most ardent tax-and-spend members on the Board of Supervisors did not call for such a referendum. They should know, because they have first-hand experience with voter anger over the rising real estate taxes.

 

Given Howell's obsession with raising our taxes, one wonders how she can claim on her website that she has "succeeded in reducing taxes." Apparently our good senator thinks that because all her bills calling for tax increases have been defeated, voters should overlook her track record.

 

In other words, we should simply believe what she says - and not hold her accountable for what she does.

 

But Howell is not fooling anyone. She tells us that she's working on restructuring Virginia's tax structure. "Tax restructuring" has become the latest code words out of Richmond for increasing our taxes.

 

All the proposals that have come out of the tax restructuring committee so far have been exposed as blatant attempts to use the tax restructuring exercise to increase taxes.

 

Fighting against Howell's record of tax increases is Dave Hunt, her Republican opponent. Dave is a no-nonsense politician who says it like it is. He has already developed numerous proposals for solving our transportation gridlock, reducing our tax burden, and reforming state government.

 

Fortunately, on Nov. 4, the voters in the 32nd Senate District will have a real choice. They can vote for Howell and her long history of attempting to raise our taxes, as well as her record of non-accomplishments. Or they can hold her accountable and boot her out of office.

 

Sending Hunt to Richmond will also send a strong message to the liberal Senate contingent - both Republicans and Democrats - that the voters are fed up with their bait-and-switch politics.

 

-- October 6, 2003

 

This column was first published in the Sept. 30 edition of "Policy Commentary," the Virginia Club for Growth newsletter.

 

Bring Home the Bacon

Help   About search

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Phillip Rodokanakis, a Certified Fraud Examiner and a political consultant, lives in Oak Hill. He is vice president of communications for the Virginia Club for Growth.

 

He can be reached by e-mail at phil-r@cox.net.