Guest Column

Phillip Rodokanakis



Phantom Budget Cuts

Politicians claim they've whacked $6 billion in state expenditures. Bull twinky! The only thing they've cut is anticipated rates of increase, while state spending grows unabated.


 

To hear Gov. Mark R. Warner say it, he literally accomplished the impossible: He cut $6 billion from the state budget without raising our taxes. Quite an accomplishment indeed!

 

In his Oct. 15, 2002, Address to the Commonwealth on Additional Budget Reductions, the governor said:

"We cut state spending. We used half of the state's rainy day' reserve. We authorized tuition increases at public colleges and universities. We froze car tax reimbursements. We reduced contributions to employee retirement accounts. And we've shrunk the size of state government by more than 3,700 employees since January."

 

Legislators from both parties have repeated this mantra in self congratulatory comments about having made the tough decisions and cutting services across the board.

 

Following these budget cutting proclamations, some elected officials have issued comments on the need to address areas that have gone neglected because of recent budget cuts. Tax-and-spend liberals are already crying for increased state revenues. Read: new taxes.

 

In an Aug. 5 speech to the Virginia Foundation for Research and Economic Education, Sen. John Chichester, R-Fredericksburg, the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, beseeched his audience about the need to increase Virginia's commitment to the future. He said that we must shore up our damaged infrastructure, which we let go dormant.

We all have to manage our family budgets, and when we spend more than we make, we have two choices: Either borrow money to meet the expenditures that exceed our income, or simply cut spending.

 

Since our state government has reportedly cut $6 billion from its budget, one would expect that state spending also would have been significantly reduced.

Alas, that's not the case. Irrespective of the "budget cuts," state spending has gone up each and every year.

 

In fact, according to figures from the state Senate Finance Committee staff, state spending in Virginia has increased by nine percent from Fiscal Year 1999 to FY 2000, 0.69 percent from FY 2000 to FY '01, 6 percent from FY 2001 to FY '02, and 4 percent from FY 2002 to FY '03.

 

That's a total spending increase of 21.83 percent over the last four fiscal years -- the same period that our politicians have been beating the budget-cutting drumbeat.

This follows historic increases in spending during the mid-1990s, the result of the dot.com bubble. These were the good times, and our state legislators spent every cent that came into the state's coffers like drunken sailors.

You may be asking, how is it possible to continue spending while we're in a budget-cutting mode?

That's because budget estimates for future years are based on overly optimistic revenue projections. When there is an economic recession and estimated revenue projections are not met, legislators lament the shortfall and then take credit for cutting the budget.

 

They cry, "We cut, cut, cut" even while they continue to spend, spend, spend!

 

This is no different than if you wanted to buy a $50,000 luxury car, but later decided to buy a basic sedan, which only cost $20,000, instead. Do you then proudly proclaim that you just saved $30,000?

Of course not, but that's exactly what our legislators are doing by making cuts on inflated and unrealistic budget projections.

 

In fact, the Fairfax County Taxpayers Alliance makes the point that the current Virginia budget is $9 billion more than needed to cover population and inflation growth since 1984.

 

One legislator has been continuing to point out these fallacies. Sen. Bill Bolling, R-Mechanicsville, has been talking about these phantom budget cuts and the state's runaway spending. He points out that we haven't reduced actual state spending at all; all we have done is reduce the anticipated rates of increase in state spending from one budget year to the next.

In a recent e-mail exchange, Sen. Bolling told me:

 

The point is simple. In tough economic times, businesses and families have to tighten their belts and spend within their means. Government should do no less.

The economy will improve, and when it does, we can increase spending on core responsibilities. But we cannot keep spending money in tough economic times like we did in prosperous economic times.

The only way to support that bad habit is through higher taxes, and people are already taxed enough.

Sen. Bolling, who has gained a reputation for being a no-nonsense politician, recently announced his candidacy for the office of lieutenant governor in 2005. It's refreshing to see a politician who aspires to higher office, yet calls it like it is and doesn't repeat the mantra parroted by the groupthink mentality that permeates the Richmond establishment.

 

So when your representative says that we cut services or eliminated jobs, ask a simple question: How have we cut anything when state spending has continued to grow every year?

 

-- September 25, 2003

 

 

Bring Home the Bacon

Help   About search

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Phillip Rodokanakis, a Certified Fraud Examiner and a political consultant, lives in Oak Hill. He is vice president of communications for the Virginia Club for Growth.

 

He can be reached by e-mail at phil-r@cox.net.