Reporters
covering Gov. Mark R. Warner's August 25 report on
state finances couldn't tell if the glass was half
empty or half full. The
governor didn't clear things up.
Seeing
a glass half full he said: "Job growth in
Virginia
has now been positive for three months. Job growth
in July (0.9 percent) showed the best monthly increase in
over two years. In Northern
Virginia,
job growth has now been positive for seven
consecutive months. And, payroll withholding [of
income tax] collections – the best current indicator we have of
the Virginia
economy – are showing some momentum."
Seeing
a glass half empty he said:
"We face another very difficult budget.
Even with an economic recovery, there will be a
substantial gap between available revenues and the
spending requirements which we would all judge as
non-discretionary."
Does
it matter where the waterline is?
The water is unmistakably rising.
That
angle on the story was largely unreported the next
day and may be ignored during the remaining 60 days
of the election campaign.
And it is a curious thing when politicians
pass on a chance to take credit for good news.
The
governor's report was filled with good news,
reflecting the upside of 18 months of difficult
decisions, and provided ample cause for bipartisan
celebration. The
state has weathered the worst fiscal storm since
World War II without a significant tax increase and
without radical reductions in services.
There have been casualties and fee increases,
but in other states either the programs or the
taxpayers have suffered worse.
After
declining almost four percent in 2002,
Virginia's
General Fund tax revenue grew 1.8 percent ($200
million) in the fiscal year that ended June 30 and
is expected to grow 4.6 percent ($500 million) in
the fiscal year now underway.
The $11.4 billion in taxes to be collected
this year should break the old record (in unadjusted
dollars) set in 2001 (See Chart).
General
Fund Tax Revenue
(In
$ billions, excludes transfers)
|
Year
|
Total
Revenues
|
Growth
|
|
1994 |
6.50 |
6.0% |
|
1995 |
6.88 |
6.0% |
|
1996 |
7.36 |
6.9% |
|
1997 |
7.95 |
8.1% |
|
1998 |
8.77 |
10.4% |
|
1999 |
9.70 |
10.6% |
|
2000 |
10.79 |
11.2% |
|
2001 |
11.11 |
2.9% |
|
2002 |
10.68 |
-3.8% |
|
2003 |
10.87 |
1.8% |
|
2004 |
11.37*
|
4.6% |
|
Source:
Secretary of
Finance, Aug. 25, 2003) |
*May
2003 Forecast |
|
|
The
official revenue surplus of $55 million is the tip
of the iceberg. That
number reflects General Fund tax collections beyond
the forecast. More
than half the budget now is non-general funds
(federal funds, dedicated taxes and fees) and no
figures were reported on whether those programs
finished June with unspent cash, as they often do.
The
August 15 comptroller's report showed the state
had a General Fund "unreserved fund
balance" of $244 million on June 30, due to the
extra revenue and spending restraints. Last year it
was $70 million. The governor quickly earmarked all
of it and would deny that it represents the real
surplus amount, but its existence is hardly a sign
of fiscal stress.
Also
missing from the balance sheet was more than $200
million in federal grant funds the state collected
last spring and put in the bank to draw interest. A second installment of the same size will
come in October. Congress
gave the states this money largely to spend as they
wish. In
everything but name it is General Funds. The
governor announced August 25 that the full $415
million will not be spent yet. That demonstration of fiscal discipline
should impress Wall Street bond brokers who maintain
our AAA rating.
But
while it was a good decision, you didn't hear Warner
or anybody else saying Virginia
actually finished the year with a $260 million
revenue surplus, which will soon grow to $470
million.
Warner
made another announcement that day which drew too
little notice. He
said that there was no need to revisit the revenue
forecast for this new fiscal year. The budget relies on an expectation that tax
revenues will grow 4.6 percent this year. A year ago the
governor wisely ordered a
mid-cycle forecast and reduced spending accordingly,
but he feels no such need now.
That
is a sign that he is confident we'll make the
budget, perhaps because of those unspent balances
still not reported. Thinking deviously, it might also be a sign
that no one is interested in seeing a forecast that
is even more optimistic, at least not before
November 4. Smart lawyers and smart politicians do
not ask questions they don't want answered.
(And
Paul Goldman elsewhere in this issue (See "No
Car Tax for Life?", September 8, 2003)
reminded us that a revenue forecast above five
percent triggers the legal requirement to finish the
car tax cut. I'd forgotten that, but you can bet the
governor didn't.)
Any
doubts of the governor's quiet confidence in state
finances should have disappeared after last week's
announcement that he will include at least $525
million more in his next two-year budget for public
education. He didn't swear but certainly implied it
could be done without a tax increase.
Are
there reasons to believe that the state might blow
past the 4.6 percent projection and produce an even
healthier surplus come next summer? Yes.
In
July, the first full month of the new fiscal year,
Virginia
jobs grew almost
one percent. That's in one month. Northern Virginia
has had seven straight months of job growth. There are high profile and painful layoffs
going on, but we are seeing steady growth overall. It is not regionally balanced, but it never
is.
The
governor just announced a very nice General Dynamics
expansion in Prince William. As one of the states that did not raise taxes
significantly in either the 1992 or 2002 recessions,
Virginia
should be positioned well to compete for relocations
and expansions, and the Governor is hustling to land
them. The
latest college rankings and SAT results don't hurt
our prospects either.
The
tax cuts at the federal level will stimulate
consumer spending and sales tax collections. To make the budget we only have to match 2002
sales tax collections.
If
the federal tax changes and rising stock and real
estate market stimulate more asset sales and higher
dividend payments, that will benefit the state
treasury. Yet
the forecast is based on lower estimated income tax
payments than actually came in 2003.
The
governor, in another wise move, squeezed the refund
bubble out of the budget. For
a few years the state had run behind, paying many
income tax refunds in the following tax year to puff
up the end-of-year books. Now the Tax Department is largely current,
setting the stage for a big reduction in 2004
refunds. Plus, those who refinanced mortgages will see
smaller refunds, too.
Corporate
income tax collections, a small part of the budget
but a good economic indicator, are rebounding
nicely. They
were projected at only $301 million last year but
came in at more than $340 million. The 2004 budget presumes a collection of only
$316 million, but there is every reason to expect it
won't shrink but will continue growing instead.
So
where was the champagne?
Where were the high-fives? There may be less justification for
discussing tax increases, at least if the money is
intended to maintain existing state programs. Isn't that good news?
--
September 8, 2003
|