Koelemay's Kosmos

Doug Koelemay



 

Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics

In Virginia 2002, one can get numbers about almost everything. But statistics are no substitute for judgment in prognosticating the future.


 

We laughed out loud in the 1970s when our graduate school professor suggested that social scientists could become "as accurate as economists" in predicting political and policy behavior. The joke wasn't the still-nascent quantification and data techniques we were learning, or even the "Brother, can you paradigm?" puns he loved. Why emulate mere economists, we chuckled, when we could aspire to become, say, "as accurate as weather forecasters."

 

In the years since, the explosion in information and communications inspired humorist James Thurber to remark one day, "There is so much information about everything that you can't know anything anymore." That explosion was sparked by technological advances and new algorithms that tackle problems with more, better information. Economists, and weather forecasters for that matter, have benefited as much as any social scientist in these years. Data collection techniques are faster and more accurate. From the NASDAQ to the Weather Channel, that allows bolder and faster forecasts. It also makes possible what we all need – the ability to adjust data.

 

Richmond economist Christine Chmura explains how adjusted data works in her latest quarterly report, Virginia Economic Trends, and why we need it. "Forecasting economic growth is a difficult task," she says in as straightforward a way as possible. That's why an almost one percent increase in Virginia employment measured in the 12-month period ending about a year ago can become an almost one percent decrease when adjusted data comes in. And her choice of a dart board for the report cover confirms what we thought decades ago.

 

So, a little test seems in order: comparing the predictions that Chmura and two other leading Virginia economists made in January 2002 against the current, adjusted data. Dr. Roy Pearson is an economics professor at the College of William & Mary in Williamsburg . Dr. Stephen Fuller is a professor and director of the Center for Regional Analysis at George Mason University in Fairfax . The three responded separately to a list of questions posed by the Northern Virginia Technology Council, a group of 1,600 technology and supporting firms, eight months ago. Looking back, how accurate were they?

 

Pearson back then confirmed that 2001 ended with a recession marked by diminishing economic activity, but he said "it is not a deep recession." Chmura now measures Virginia in a recovery phase that is not yet robust, precisely because the recession was not very deep.

 

Fuller crowed then about net new jobs created in the Greater Northern Virginia region. Chmura, on the other hand, at that time cautioned that "the numbers for Northern Virginia almost certainly are showing more employment growth than there really was in the region." Chmura now reports peak-to-trough Virginia employment in 2001 actually fell by 1.9 percent, much faster than the national average, but also that the unemployment rate in Virginia remains significantly lower than the national average.

 

Pearson emphasized then that consumer sentiment and expectations would be a key factor in the size and speed of the recovery. Dr. Fuller said there was danger in developing a "recession mentality." State government certainly is proving him right with its bunker frame of mind born of shell-shocks from a revenue recession. Chmura can document the weakness and uncertainty by region and industry sector.

 

Northern Virginia 's economy was not as severely affected as Roanoke 's in the last year. That means a services-based economy shrinks slower than a manufacturing based one. Interestingly, "the moving average of building permits in Roanoke has now posted two consecutive quarters of increases." Hampton Roads has been "buffered by a large military presence," but more importantly, at an 8.8 percent growth rate, was the Virginia region with the fastest-growing technology industry over the last year. Could that be because Hampton Roads has the "youngest median age of Virginia 's metropolitan areas?" Lynchburg dropped 26 percent of its technology jobs. Ouch!

 

The fastest growth in Virginia this year has occurred in the amusement and recreation services sector. That's understandable. Who wouldn't want to escape? The slowest-growing sectors are manufacturing and air travel. Okay, who wouldn’t want to escape on something other than an airplane? Manufacturing lost over 13,000 jobs in Virginia in the 12 months that ended in June. But manufacturing wages paid were up 3.9 percent in the same period. Fewer, more valuable employees… Sounds as if productivity must be up, too.

 

"There are still more risks on the downside than on the upside," Chmura commented in January, "and it can take up to two years for employment rates to return to their pre-recession levels." That certainly has been proven true.

 

Not a bad set of predictions from three Virginia economists in total. Fortunately, the adjustment of data can continue. But the question remains whether using a prism to separate the glowing light ahead into spectral parts really is better than a crystal ball in preparing for the future. The gazer always starts with "I see," which is part of the visioning process good leaders have.

 

Virginia Secretary of Finance John Bennett, for example, is as good as any in marshalling data and laying it on the table. But the late John Kenneth Galbraith also warned that statistics could be "a technical disguise of the truth." The General Assembly money committees certainly are good at absorbing data. But statesman Henry Clay insisted through the mid-1800s that "statistics are no substitute for judgment." It shouldn't take an algorithmic genius to see a multiplicity of options for Virginia government to meet the challenges of revenues and budgets.

 

Can we get a peek at what Virginia 's economic future looks like given the data that Chmura now has before her? Yes we can: She updates her leading indexes monthly at www.chmuraecon.com. The highlights: Total non-agricultural employment down 0.4 percent in 2002, but jumping 2.3 percent in 2003. Hampton Roads, Roanoke and Charlottesville add net new jobs this year. Wages and salaries grow by 2 percent this year and 2.6 percent next year. Roanoke , Lynchburg and Charlottesville lead in this category. Retail sales climb 2.5 percent in 2002 and up 7.1 percent in 2003. Hampton Roads sales boom, but Lynchburg lags in this category. And building permits shoot up in Charlottesville, Roanoke and Richmond, but not in Northern Virginia, Hampton Roads or Lynchburg .

 

Will these thing happen? The answer is a bold "Maybe." If they don't happen, remember to adjust your data. You'll be well on your way to becoming as accurate as a social scientist.

 

-- Sept. 23, 2002