Virginia Pundit Watch

Will Vehrs



Labor Day: Line in the Sand for Pundits

Labor Day is a dependable demarcation line for columnists: the perfect place for a commentary on the start of the fall political season or an opportunity to wax eloquent on the history of labor and its current role. In Virginia, the fall political season is so non-competitive that it hardly merits mention. 

 

As for labor, only Roanoke Times columnist Del. Preston Bryant, R-Lynchburg, addressed that faithful topic. Bryant sketched the ties between organized labor and the Democratic Party, and noted union positions on issues such as organizing government workers, the right to strike, and international workplace standards. He also asked the ultimate question:

 

Virginia has long reaped the rewards of being the Eastern seaboard's northernmost right-to-work state. This has allowed the Old Dominion to welcome many companies large and small seeking a safe haven from the perils of overly aggressive union activity. Many northeastern-based companies have moved to Virginia, bringing good-paying jobs with them. The state AFL-CIO would like to see our right-to-work laws eviscerated. Would Warner?

 

It is the Republican-controlled General Assembly, according to Bryant, “that’s standing against a movement whose agenda’s ‘success’ would be tantamount to increased costs resulting in fewer jobs that’d give us decreased productivity.”

 

Old Faithful” for most Virginia pundits, on Labor Day and otherwise, continues to be the prospect of tax reform/tax increases. Bob Gibson of the Daily Progress hammered the theme that failing to raise state taxes is tantamount to forcing local taxes to rise. He wrote, “With no guts and little leadership, local taxes will be going up and lawmakers in Richmond will brag about tax relief there and demand strict proof of DNA evidence that they touched the local tax bills.”

 

The Washington Post’s R.H. Melton held out hope that Gov. Mark R. Warner would outfox anti-tax Republicans:

 

If, as many suspect, they merely tweak the tax code -- fiddling with a bracket here, closing a corporate loophole there -- Republicans will leave Warner more than enough room to make a dramatic entrance with the kind of expansive tax reform package he promised voters as a candidate.

 

That does presuppose that Warner, who is notoriously risk averse in all things political, would swoop in with a jaw-dropping proposal on the eve of the most important General Assembly session of his term. But if he is serious about making big investments in education, there is time for him to craft that package.

 

One can only hope that a “jaw-dropping” proposal will be made, or, more to the point, that it will satisfy the pundit lust for a grand, sweeping gesture.

 

Cynic of the Week

 

It’s A. Barton Hinkle of the Richmond Times-

Dispatch, hands down, for this opening line:

 

As long as the Governor and the General Assembly are doing next to nothing to reform Virginia's Coolidge-era tax system, it wouldn't hurt to recommend some other useful reforms for them to ignore.

 

Hinkle suggested combining cities and counties, using a commission for redistricting, and ending the election of constitutional officers. He also noted, as did the last edition of Virginia Pundit Watch, Professor Vincent Hazelton’s exposé of huge athletic fees charged by Virginia Universities.  Hinkle says college athletics should be self-sufficient. 

 

Barnie and Larry on Mark

 

Barnie Day, writing in the Roanoke Times, apparently discussed the legacy of Governor Warner with University of Virginia Professor and pundit Larry Sabato. Day never quite brings himself to reveal whether he interviewed Sabato, or just lifted some of the professor’s voluminous quotage.  Sabato credits Warner with making the best of a bad situation and Day almost admits that the governor’s approach might be better than the combative, “blood in the water” stance he urged.

 

The Poor Dears

 

Gov. Warner is attacking “senioritis” with his proposal to have high school students take college courses during their final year. Pediatrician Lee Ann Steffe, writing in the Roanoke Times, opposes the plan. Among her arguments: seniors aren’t developmentally ready, they might get depressed, the courses might be too difficult, or the courses might not be difficult enough. “We need to examine the requirements for an advanced diploma and ask how much math, science, foreign language and history are really needed to develop the mind of an 18-year-old.” 

 

Charter School Doubts

 

Charter schools are an issue in Prince William County and two Potomac News columnists addressed the concept. Gary Jacobsen used his space to bash unnamed and unquoted Republicans as “extremists” for their advocacy of charter schools, laying out a series of tests for charter schools that he claimed Republicans would not address. By contrast, Denise Oppenhagen actually evaluated a charter school application and expressed her specific doubts.

 

Pay Up!

 

Virginia’s Tax Commissioner, Kenneth Thorson, took to the op-ed pages of the Richmond Times-Dispatch to defend the Commonwealth’s new tax amnesty program:

 

Is making these concessions to tax delinquents, when the rest of us dutifully pay our taxes on time, a fair solution to our budgetary predicament? Does amnesty create a risky precedent, planting in some taxpayers the notion that if they do not pay now, they need only wait until the next amnesty rolls around?

 

In the case of tax amnesty, the revenues that the program generates will benefit all Virginians and help to alleviate severe budget challenges. In short, the larger good in this case clearly outweighs what some might perceive as inequitable treatment.

 

Tardy taxpayers have until November 4th to pay up. If they don’t, according to Thorson, “They will be hearing from us.”

 

Tenuous Virginia Angles

 

In case you were wondering if Virginia might emulate California on the recall or Alabama on the Ten Commandments, two columnists offered their opinions. Bob Gibson of the Daily Progress suggested that “Some Virginia Republicans would head down the slippery slope of recall elections if only they could and also would adopt recall’s abused cousins — initiative and referendum — to allow voters to express frustration with the workings of representative democracy.” His only evidence was an op-ed on the Supreme Court from Del. Robert Marshall, R-Manassas, while he quoted Del. Rob Bell, R-Albemarle, as disapproving of the recall.

 

Jeff Schapiro of the Richmond Times-Dispatch compared Del. Scott Lingamfelter, R-Prince William, to controversial Alabama Supreme Court Justice Roy Moore, defender of the Ten Commandments statue, but admitted, “it might be a stretch.”   Lingamfelter sponsored a bill to post the Ten Commandments in classrooms, which was defeated in a Senate committee.

 

It’s the Coffee, Stupid

 

As if there weren’t enough rump groups already meeting in Virginia to influence policy, R.H. Melton of the Washington Post identified another: the “Tuesday Morning Group (TMG),” a Republican “floating crap game of political theories and legislative proposals” that is “fortified by coffee and danish.” One good rump group deserves another:

 

The TMG has no real counterpart on Virginia's political left, no semi-organized coffee klatch of activists who hammer out an agenda that the state Democratic Party could use in elections.

 

The future of Virginia belongs to the “coffee klatch.”

 

-- September 8, 2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

Will Vehrs grew up in Prince William County. He has a degree in American history from the College of William and Mary and an MBA from Chapman University. Will's experience includes a stint with a Fortune 500 company and economic development work in state government. His "Punditwatch" column appears on FoxNews.com and Jewish World Review, as well as on his own Punditwatch website. He also writes for the Quasipundit political site.