VPM and the ACLU Descend into Madness

Taylor Marie Maloney

by James A. Bacon

Only one Richmond news outlet, Virginia Public Media, has written about the controversy engendered by the hateful online language of Taylor Maloney, president of the Virginia Commonwealth University student government. No surprise, the angle of the VPM report was not how Taylor tweeted, “i hate white people so much its not even funny” and advocated the killing of police, but the “harassment” that Taylor, a Black non-binary transgender activist, has received from irate right-wing bloggers.

Maloney’s propensity for violent and racist rhetoric was outed, so to speak, by Andy Ngo, a conservative journalist writing in an online publication, The Post Millennial.

Maloney, who goes by the pronouns them/they, has adopted various personas on Twitter, including “fuck off honkeys” and “cancel cultural worker.” When a follower of the black nationalist Nation of Islam group rammed his car into Capitol Police, killing one of the officers on April 2, Maloney celebrated his death. “[L]ove this we need more of this,” “they” tweeted.

Maloney defended the two teen carjackers who killed Uber Eats driver Mohammad Anwar in Washington, D.C. Maloney also called for the burning of city buses in Richmond. “[W]hen Richmond gonna fry up another [Greater Richmond Transit Company] bus? When are we gonna see some action again? I thought yall was anarchists,” Maloney blasted out last week.

The VPM detailed none of this incendiary language. Here’s how it glossed over “their” rhetoric:

The [Post Millennial] features a mugshot of Maloney and screenshots of their tweets where they advocate for killing police officers and damaging private property in response to racial injustice. Maloney says while the tweets may seem “very vulgar or very abrasive,” they’re in response to what they consider a bigger issue.

“It’s a new Black person I watch die every single week,” Maloney said. “I still need an outlet to be angry about that, and I still need space to say that I don’t think this is right.”

VPM apparently found these statements perfectly reasonable. The author saw no need, for instance, to note that Blacks lost an estimated 8,600 lives to homicide in 2020, almost all of them at the hands of other Blacks, or that Maloney had expressed no remorse for them.

Maloney told VPM “they” have received hundreds of negative comments on social media criticizing “their” anti-police comments and communist political views. VPM quoted Jules, another Twitter activist profiled by Ngo last year, as saying that about 1,000 of Ngo’s “fascist following” sent insults and threatened to kill and sexually assault her. Maloney, however, made no such claims, so the relevance of Jules’ comment is hard to decipher.

VPM’s boot-licking journalism is bad enough. Even more disturbing, Claire Gastañaga, executive director of the Virginia branch of the American Civil Liberties Union and very much an establishment figure in Richmond, defended Maloney. While conceding that some of “their” online comments were “abhorrent and indefensible,” Gastañaga said, “We will continue to defend their right to express their views even if we disagree with them.”

She also questioned Ngo’s intentions. “We need to ask why a Canadian news company whose mission is to ‘report Canadian news events’ is interested in the political views and personal information of a U.S. college student.”

Perhaps one reason Ngo profiled Maloney is that members of the mainstream media across the U.S. have steadfastly looked the other way at extremist left-wing language while focusing exclusively on the dangers of right-wing radicalism. Ngo aggressively covered Antifa riots in Portland, among other places.

Gastañaga suggests that Ngo has directed “harassment” to Maloney because “they” represent a challenge to the political status quo.

“Emerging leaders who are not straight white men with mainstream political views are scrutinized, targeted and harassed every day with a higher level of intensity,” she said, apparently unware that Ngo is gay. And Asian. (But he is a man. One out of three ain’t bad.) “It is clear that Taylor was targeted by a well-known and active provocateur who wanted to take away their power.”

So, that’s the ACLU position now: Calling out left-wing activists who incite race hatred and advocate killing police is something the heterosexual white patriarchy does to “take away the power” of marginalized people. I’d say that Gastañaga, who once upon a time staked out reasonable positions on controversial issues, has officially lost her marbles.

The only voice of reason in the article came from the VCU administration. “Calls for violence and hateful language do not reflect the position or values of VCU, ” said university spokesman Mike Porter. “The Student Government Association is a student-run organization. Neither the organization nor any of its members or officers speaks or acts on behalf of VCU.” 

I’ve learned three important things from this article. First, VPM doesn’t even pretend to be even-handed anymore. It has gone over to the dark side. Second, the leadership of the Virginia ACLU has lost its collective mind. And third, the VCU administration maintains at least a shred of sanity.

Share this article


(comments below)


(comments below)


11 responses to “VPM and the ACLU Descend into Madness”

  1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    There is a lot of talk about harassment. As far as Maloney is concerned, all I can gather is that she got “negative comments.” VPM asserts there were threats, but Maloney does not use that term. If there were actual threats, the reporting should be more specific.

    Yes, Maloney has the right to say what she wants to say and in the manner that she wants to express it, as hateful as it is. But, others have the right to criticize her,. using equally abusive language. Free speech goes both ways.

    As for Gastañaga, I don’t understand the ACLU criticizing a journalist by saying he “targets” certain leftist speakers. If someone makes public comments, then that person is fair game for having those comments reported by journalists of whatever stripe. Sometimes, I think Gastañaga is her own worst enemy.

  2. LarrytheG Avatar

    I don’t think this woman represents the views of most on the left anymore than some of the really radical views on the right – represent the large body of folks who are Conservatives.

    In the age of the internet and social media and websites for every Tom, Dick and Harry, no matter how radical…

    we’ve devolved from adults into a bunch of adolescents in our language and “debate”.

    1. Packer Fan Avatar
      Packer Fan

      Ah Larry! Who’s presenting the “both sides” argument now?

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        Touche’ fair point.

  3. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Apparently the snowflake can dish it out but cannot take it. Twitter has been a sewer for a long time. Abandon hope all ye who enter…I had a tweet on the Texas power outages go near-viral and the attacks I got in response from all over were of the same stripe. I took it as a mark it was being read.

    My problem with the ACLU of today is I really doubt Claire would come to the defense of an equally obnoxious and hateful person on the other side. No more cred for a group I once respected.

    Sorry, which Biden Administration appointment is Maloney up for? Nothing she’s said is that different from some of the others he’s nominated….

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      “Apparently the snowflake can dish it out but cannot take it.”

      You sure she is not a member of UVa’s YAG…?? Confusing times…

  4. The Gateway Pundit does a superb job of demolish the VPM story. It is a ruthless takedown.

    While reporter Alan Espinoza fully deserves the dressing down he gets, the problem runs deeper. Espinoza is a cub reporter — he graduated from VCU in 2019. I presume VPM has people on staff called editors, and that editors, who are supposed to be older, wiser, and more conversant with the standards of journalism, exercise some degree of oversight. Where the heck were the editors?

    You can’t call articles like this “journalism.” They’re not really “commentary” either. The only word that comes to mind is “propaganda.”

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      One can name some others also, right?

      You go looking around in fringe publications and media and you’re gonna find all kinds of smelly stuff – so what’s the point?

      It exists. Both sides. Right?

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        OMG, he finally gets it. Yes, Larry, the extremists who advocate hate and violence on both sides are the problem. I may have to copy and hold this for the next time you refuse to face that…..

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          Stephen – there is a difference between those who have always advocated violence in publications and those who have actually carried it out.

          I “got it” all along but I DO differentiate between every Tom, Dick, and Harry who has a grievance – real or imagined – as an individual – and those individuals who form groups that then actually do carry out violent acts.

          When I see black groups that function like Unite the Right, Oath Keepers and Proud Boys, I’ll admit “both sides” .

          If we really want to talk about radical views – how about equal time for the rancid right?

  5. L Garou Avatar
    L Garou

    You can’t fool Mother Nature much less usurp her, fakers..

Leave a Reply