by James C. Sherlock
I have noticed some understandable confusion in the meanings of key words in the lexicon of the left.
If you have not read the writings of anti-racist “scholars” such Ibram X. Kendi, Robin DiAngelo, Ta-Nehisi Coates, Glen Singleton and others — multi-millionaires all on the back of their anti-racist writings and speeches — you don’t have a chance.
Without the reading, there is no way on God’s earth to accurately describe their philosophy. Much less understand it. It is a masochistic mission to which I have sentenced myself. So here goes.
In current usage racial equity and anti-racism have two entirely different meanings.
- Racial equity requires equal opportunities;
- Anti-racism requires equal outcomes.
Anti-racism demands that all acknowledge that racism is the source of all racial disparities — that race is the primary determinant of black Americans’ lives. The disparities list usually includes:
- less wealth;
- poorer health;
- lower academic achievement; and
- higher rates of unemployment.
It is true that those disparities exist and that we must take steps to shrink them.
However, anti-racist “scholars” collect gross data, arrange them by race and point out disparities, insisting not only that correlation equals causation but that no other facts may be considered. They insist that if racism is eliminated, the disparities will disappear.
Then anti-racists define things that are artifacts of racism.
- They consider capitalism to be racist root and branch. It thus must be eliminated.
- Similarly they consider the common Western understanding of qualifications to be based in racist assumptions of what matters to success, the definition of which they also consider to be an artifact of racism.
- Achievement tests and standardized tests in general must be eliminated.
- School grades must be leveled to reflect cultural differences, not improved academic achievement. (In Albemarle County, for example, where new grading rules demand anti-racist leveling, we can confidently expect a banner headline next year in the Daily Progress that anti-racist policies improved black academic achievement.)
- Self-reliance and personal freedom have produced unequal outcomes and thus have no place in an anti-racist society.
The claim that blacks have no agency in the outcomes of their lives is perhaps the most profoundly racist sentiment alive in the land, but it is what anti-racists profess to believe.
Anti-racists reject the 400 years of Western civilization that have advanced freedom and the rights of man.
They also proclaim that no matter how outwardly successful by white standards individual blacks may be, they nonetheless remain victims of racism. They reject the views of the many black scholars who understandably openly disagree with them and declare them to be racists as well.
When you only have a hammer everything looks like a nail.
It also means that people like me, who try through the General Assembly to improve the access to primary medical and dental care for white and black people living in pockets of poverty in Virginia, are considered to not understand that it is racism, not access to healthcare, that has determined health disparities. At least for the black poor.
Thus we are racist. Because we are not anti-racist. And the poor white component of our efforts is not helpful to the cause.