Citizen Oversight of Police Off to Poor Start

Richmond Police Chief Gerald Smith

by James A. Bacon

Setting up a citizen review board to provide oversight of the police is one of those ideas that sounds better in theory than it works in practice.

Police officers are human. Like anyone else they can make mistakes. Also, being human, they look out for one another. When a policeman kills someone in the line of duty, can citizens count on the internal police department review to be objective? Surely it makes sense to create a mechanism to review the reviewers. Checks and balances — that’s part of the American way.

But in in the real world, there must be a modicum of trust and good will for a review board to work. And the process of creating such a board in the City of Richmond is off to a rocky start.

In late March, the city set up a nine-person task force to set up a Civil Review Board empowered to investigate allegations of police misconduct. The task force will recommend who should serve on the board, how it would function, and how much it would cost. As described by the Richmond Times-Dispatch, the board would function independently, with its own budget and its own investigators to complete probes outside the police department’s chain of command.

According to a March 30 RTD article, Police Chief Gerald Smith publicly supported the review board’s creation, in contrast to his predecessors — two of whom were fired by Mayor Levar Stoney during the tumultuous protests and riots of last summer.

Last week, though, the task force publicly criticized Smith for lack of communication. Task force members say they had been trying to reach him for more than a month. In an article today, Smith disputed the assertions. “These communications started last week,” he told the RTD.

Smith made another critical point: The most effective review boards work in collaboration with police rather than in confrontation.

Smith did appear at a task force meeting Wednesday and engaged in what the RTD described as a “tense exchange” with task force members amid a presentation from Sharon Fairley, a University of Chicago Law School professor and chief administrator of Chicago’s Independent Police Review Authority.

“We’re looking at citizen review, not oversight — review,” Smith said. Of the study, he asked: “Were there problems that needed to be addressed? Were there an exorbitant amount of use-of-force complaints? Or other complaints of use of force that was maybe not excessive, but unnecessary? Did the study take into account whether or not the police agency was working as it should rather than not working as it should?”

Fairley called her research “agnostic,” focusing on the prevalence and primary functions of civilian oversight rather than why the bodies were created or their effectiveness.

“The ones that are most effective are the ones that work in partnership with the police department for the betterment of the police department, for the betterment of the community. Those that actually communicate with the police department,” Smith said. “Those are the ones that tend to be the most effective and make the most significant change successful.

“There are other models. It is really a battle. They seem to want confrontation, those boards that are built for confrontation as opposed to partnership and in the spirit of community and making things better. Those are the ones that tend to not do as well as those that are in the spirit of partnership.”

Task force members insisted that their goal is to build trust between the police and the community. “Certainly, approaching that from an adversarial perspective is not helpful,” said Eli Coston, a VCI professor and co-chair of the task force. ““We want to hear what your questions about this process are, what your concerns about this process are, and also to help your officers who might have reservations understand the benefits of civilian oversight for the entire police department.”

Part of the task force’s frustration stem from the city’s procedural bureaucracy. “I feel like we’re being rushed and the city is saying go 65 mph and the city is throwing down speed bumps every 2 inches,” Jewel Gatling said. “You can’t tell us to hurry up and go, hurry up and go, and we’re trying … and then it’s this bump and that bump.”

Bacon’s bottom line: It will be disastrous if these discussions remain adversarial. If the civilian review board becomes a mechanism for anti-police militants to second-guess and undermine the police, morale in the already under-staffed police force will tank. Officers will jump ship, recruitment will suffer, and the phenomenon of “over policing” will become a distant memory. And Richmond will start looking a lot like Chicago.

Share this article


(comments below)


(comments below)


6 responses to “Citizen Oversight of Police Off to Poor Start”

  1. Every member of the board must be required to take parts of the police training about decision making, including most importantly the shoot-don’t shoot training. Then each member must be required to participate in a ride along shift each and every month.

  2. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Ya want police that meets the highest professional standards? Make them professionals. Licensing, and like other professionals — doctors, lawyers, engineers — eliminate qualified immunity and replace it with professional liability insurance. The state can pick up the premiums, to a point. Eventually, the insurers will weed out the unprofessional and the dangerous.

    Consequence as deterrent. It’s the Conservative way.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      I agree with NN totally. Part of the problem IS that the police do NOT want oversight and to them anything that functions like oversight is an adversarial threat.

      We need to honestly ask ourselves WHY our police have so much more violent confrontations than police in other developed countries.

      Is it possible that if those other countries adopted methods our police use – they too would then have more violent confrontations?

      There is something fundamentally wrong with the way many jurisdictions approach policing. It sometimes seems to promote the use of force and the threat of physical harm or death if those who interact do not “comply”.

      At any rate, accountability without oversight seems like a contradiction in terms.

  3. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    There have been 258,000 gun sales in Virginia since New Years Day. Undermining an already weak kneed police department isn’t helping.

  4. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
    Baconator with extra cheese

    I am so so in love with idea that ignorant (used in the context of not knowing) citizens may be on boards that will question “professionals” in the most liberal of cities.
    Virginia has done it with environmental justice advisory panels and other boards and now localities with police departments.
    The backlash when smart leadership finds they can’t implement some of the illogical “solutions” from these committees will be incredible to watch. No one can survive the War of Woke…. there is never a bottom. And these committees don’t necessarily give a rat’s bottom about actual law… this is about feelings.
    The Police Chief knows this. But on the other hand he and Stoney have supported the woke tsunami for political gain. Have fun fellas…. may you enjoy the green lasers shining in your windows and the spraypaint artwork on your property. No justice no peace!

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      re: ” … I am so so in love with idea that ignorant (used in the context of not knowing) citizens may be on boards that will question “professionals” ”

      work that way for Fairfax County schools and VDOE also?


Leave a Reply