Nine Years Later, Bon Secours Still Hasn’t Made Good on Promises

With help from Redskins cheerleaders, then-Richmond Mayor Dwight Jones announces the $40 million Redskins training camp deal. Photo credit: Richmond Times-Dispatch

by James A. Bacon

In October 2012, the City of Richmond negotiated a $40 million deal with the Washington Redskins and the Bon Secours Virginia Health System to build a Redskins training camp in the city. The complex deal had many moving parts. To make it happen, the city gave Bon Secours a long-term lease on the property of the old Westhampton School site so it could build a medical facility in the city’s prosperous West End. In exchange for favorable lease terms and the right to sponsor the training camp, the Richmond-based health system agreed to construct a medical office and fitness center in the poor, inner-city East End where it also operated the Richmond Community Hospital.

“This agreement will allow Bon Secours to significantly expand upon our effort to build healthier communities across Richmond,” CEO Peter J. Bernard said in a news release at the time.

Bon Secours did build the fitness center. But nearly a decade later, no ground has broken for the medical office.

Time is running out for the company to make good on its agreement, warn Michael Schewel, former executive vice president of Tredegar Corp., who served as Secretary of Commerce and Trade under Governor Mark Warner, and Steve Markel, chairman of the Markel Corp.

“They’ve gotten an extension from the EDA (Economic Development Authority) and they’re absolutely at the end of their time,” says Schewel. They’ve got to get a building permit, build a building, hire people, and get it done within a year of Jan. 1. It takes six months just to get a building permit from the city!”

Bon Secours told Bacon’s Rebellion that it has invested millions of dollars in Church Hill and that it intends to make good on the deal. “Our health system’s leaders are committed to the construction schedule, as shared with the City and EDA, which will allow it to be built by the current deadline of December 31, 2022,” said spokesperson Emma Swan in a prepared statement.

Only time will tell if Bon Secours is able to live up to that commitment. But there is a bigger story here. What responsibility does Bon Secours — a Catholic health system whose mission statement is to “extend the compassionate ministry of Jesus … and bring good help to those in need, especially people who are poor, dying and underserved” — to make good on its values? What obligation does it have, as a nonprofit hospital chain enjoying exemption from taxation, to serve the community?

In particular, what do Bon Secours’ highly profitable Virginia operations owe the poor residents of Richmond’s Church Hill where its community hospital generated an extraordinary $73 million in operating income in 2019 — the third highest profit margin of any hospital in Virginia?

Neither Markel nor Schewel had had any formal association with  the Washington Redskins deal. But Markel, one of Richmond’s leading philanthropists has maintained an interest in Church Hill for many years; he was the major financial backer of a community grocery store that he hoped would address the issue of food deserts in the predominantly African-American neighborhood. Schewel came to the issue when serving on the board of the Better Housing Coalition, which was active in Church Hill.

“Bon Secours said they were going to do a bunch of things with us,” Schewel says. “They never did. I was unhappy with them because of their failed commitments. Steve and I started talking about how to get Bon Secours to do the right thing.”

Richmond Community Hospital. Photo credit: WWBT

Deal timeline. I present the following account upon a time-line developed by Schewel.

The deal between Richmond, Bon Secours and the Redskins was announced Oct. 23, 2012. On July 8 the following year the Richmond EDA and Bon Secours executed a performance agreement detailing the terms of the health system’s expansions. Bon Secours agreed to the following benefits to the people living in north Church Hill:

  • Construct $8.5 million in additional medical and related facilities, containing not less than 25,000 square feet, near Richmond Community Hospital.
  • Create 75 full-time jobs with annual minimum payroll of $6.7 million.
  • Pay the City $100,000 per year for 10 years for capital projects to benefit the public schools of Richmond and promote health, fitness, and anti-obesity efforts.

In return, the City leased the Westhampton school property to the health system for $5,000 for an initial term, with two two-year extensions. This lease, say Markel and Schewel, was for way less than market value for a property to be redeveloped with a minimum $24 million investment.

In January 2015, Peter Bernard, who had negotiated the deal for Bon Secours, retired as CEO, but the company continued to make progress on fulfilling its promises. A March 2016 Performance Agreement Report stated that the groundbreaking ceremony for the Parseley’s Center for Healthy Communities was scheduled for April. Also, the company noted that it had acquired a parcel adjoining Richmond Community, that it had filed for rezoning, and was “moving ahead with plans for a medical office building.” Additionally, the company was collaborating on a project to build a grocery store, pharmacy, and primary care clinic in the neighborhood.

The grocery store was constructed, thanks largely to the philanthropic support of Markel and others, but Bon Secours dragged its feet on the medical-office project. In July 2018, six years after the original announcement, the company still was saying that it was “moving forward with its plans to expand its RCH campus.” That September, the company told the EDA that it has “all internal approvals with funding in place.” It also affirmed that it was planning to meet its commitment create 75 FTE jobs and $6.7 million in payroll. In November 2018, the company filed a Plan of Development for the 25,000-square feet medical office building.

But nothing happened. On Sept. 5, 2018, Bon Secours announced that it had completed a “merger” with Mercy Health, another Catholic hospital chain. But Mercy was the dominant player, and the corporate headquarters moved to Cincinnati, Ohio. There was turnover in the top spot in Richmond, and Markel and Schewel believe that the company has lost a lot of institutional memory and connection to the community since then.

“Once Mercy Health bought it, all control shifted from Richmond to Cincinnati,” says Schewel. “Basically, they don’t care. They’re not interested.”

Mercy Health remained very interested, however, in the Westhampton property and other projects in affluent sub-markets of the Richmond metropolitan area. Since the summer of 2018, the company has announced:

  • The opening of a cardiopulmonary rehab center at its St. Francis Medical Center in Chesterfield County.
  • A separate $119 million expansion at St. Francis.
  • The $50 million expansion of Memorial Regional Medical Center in Hanover County.
  • A free-standing, 24,000-square-foot emergency department facility in Chesterfield County.
  •  A $34 million upgrade of its Memorial regional operating room.

Meanwhile, the Westhampton School site has been substantially redeveloped through investments of tens of millions of dollars. Construction is far advanced.

Astonishing profits. Bon Secours will make millions of dollars profit on the Westhampton “sweetheart deal” lease over the course of the initial lease term, says Schewel. “The City never contemplated that Bon Secours would flip the school site to someone else and then profit handsomely from the City’s low rent deal.  The profit is even more egregious in light of Bon Secours’ failure to effect the East End Expansion.”

Now it has been nearly nine years since Bon Secours contractually obligated itself to invest in Richmond’s East End. The neglect is all the more remarkable given Richmond Community’s astonishing profitability.

Typically, inner-city hospitals have been very unprofitable, and many across the country have shut down over the years. Indeed, Bon Secours rescued Richmond Community, which was descended from the first African-American healthcare facility in Virginia and fell on hard times, in 1995. But since then Mercy and Bon Secours shuttered its DePaul hospital in inner-city Norfolk and other low-income markets, says Schewel.

Poor urban populations typically rely heavily upon Medicaid, which traditionally reimbursed has providers below their cost, and run up big bills that hospitals write off as charity care or uncompensated care. But Community Hospital was an exception in Fiscal 2019, the most recent year for which data is available through Virginia Health Information. The hospital generated net patient revenue of $203 million after deducting for charity care and bad debt and reported an operating income of $73 million. Only two other hospitals in Virginia reported higher profit margins.

“If those numbers are true,” says Schewel, “it means they are taking RCH profits and using them not to expand the campus and fulfill the obligations to the city. They’re funding expansion of the White suburban hospitals.”

Bon Secours’ investments in the East End. In a statement to Bacon’s Rebellion, Bon Secours defended its track record, both regarding the deal with the city and its investments in the East End.

“Bon Secours has always remained committed to developing the Richmond Community Hospital campus and investing in the health and community,” said the statement. “The medical office building on the RCH campus is just one way Bon Secours will develop the campus and create jobs.”

The company’s investment in the medical office building will exceed the $8.5 million in the performance agreement. The sum has been approved and “is being spent as the project is in development.”

Over and above the office building, Bon Secours has invested more than $9.8 million since 2013 on renovations and expansions at Richmond Community, and it has erected a wellness and fitness center and spent $1.6 million in partnership with the Salvation Army Boys and Girls Club to build a gymnasium. Between 2014 and 2020, the company has invested more than $12 million in community benefit dollars” to address “the social determinants of health” in the East End. That includes $780,000 invested in 36 businesses through its SEED program. In 2017 Bon Secours also opened the Sarah Garland Jones Center for Healthy Living, a $1.7 million facility dedicated to providing nutrition, health and wellness educational programming, workforce development training, and improved access to care for area residents.

Between 2013 and 2020, the company has provided more than $216 million in charity care at Richmond Community Hospital alone.

Whatever the numbers, they are a come-down from when Bernard was running the show, says Markel. The former CEO was engaged with the city, the housing authority, and the community in planning the redevelopment of north Church Hill. And not just commercial development but civic improvements like streetscapes and walkability.

There’s more than meets the eye to the RCH financials, adds Markel. The hospital has been reducing the number of doctors there and cutting back on services for three years. How can it be reporting such phenomenal profits?

That’s a story for another time and another blog post.

Share this article


(comments below)


(comments below)


26 responses to “Nine Years Later, Bon Secours Still Hasn’t Made Good on Promises”

  1. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Maybe this distrust of the medical community has deeper roots than just a vaccine?

    1. DJRippert Avatar

      Medical community? Quaint.

      It’s the BigHealth lobby in Virginia and the store bought General Assembly that creates the distrust.

      Speaking of vaccines – the Israelis say my Pfizer vax is now 16% effective. Where are the boosters? Supposedly they start on Sept 20. Great. Do I walk into the local CVS with my vax card and get jabbed?

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Dosen’t matter since Covid-mu apparently is vaccine, AND previous infection, resistant.

        Since those who forewent the vaccine in favor of their previous infection have flagging immune responses as well, what’s best for them? Should they get the vaccine? Or, should they hang around their local ER?

        ** BTW that dosen’t was intentional… dose not… get it?

        1. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          Sorry, folk, but Larry and Nancy have their orders from DPV and must make every post about COVID….But for Trump and COVID the Party would have nothing else to talk about….

          1. Matt Adams Avatar

            There was a good bit of fervor stirred about POTUS Biden bungling the receivership of remains.

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            What? You don’t think people will notice that DJ brought up the topic?

            Okay, here. Let your Party shine. Tell us more about these manufacturing jobs.

            Oh, just in case you haven’t heard this before, “Lickspittle flattery is only toxic if swallowed.”

          3. DJRippert Avatar

            Nancy … you’re getting “all Biden” on us again. Go look at the comment string. Who initially brought up vaccines?

          4. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            I’m sorry for the confusion DJ. I meant vaccines in general, but given the current times, easy to see the assumption.

            This whole anti-medical stuff started with the MMR thing, and has been growing, e.g., Vioxx, and the Sacklers getting away with mass murder ain’t gonna help.

          5. LarrytheG Avatar

            really? Have I even commented on this thread?

  2. Super Brain Avatar
    Super Brain

    Bon Secours IRS Form 990 may make interesting reading esp page 7.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Page 7 is blank. See Schedule O. What would you like to know?
      Toni A. Works 6hr/week with 44 at a related business for about $1M in total.

      1. Super Brain Avatar
        Super Brain

        Fun Things: P 9 is revenue, P 10 expenses
        Sch J shows a breakdown of compensation
        Schp 1-3 shows all related organizations and activity between them

  3. DJRippert Avatar

    If Richmond can kill this whole deal they should do so. No association with Dan Snyder is the best association with Dan Snyder … and I am an avid, lifelong Washington Redskins … errr …. Football Team fan.

    So, Snyder’s executives couldn’t stop harassing the team’s cheerleaders. What’s the answer? Fire the harassers? Ha! Eliminate he cheerleading squad. The decision is to replace the cheerleaders with a coed dance squad. Hopefully the men on the squad will be former Navy Seals or MMA artists who can keep Snyder’s goons at bay.

  4. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Well, do give us part two and explain how reducing service can increase profits. That’s how profit-making enterprises sometimes do it, but one is sorry to see it emulated by those who posture such lofty motives. Don’t neglect the role of the Medicaid expansion.

    Excellent reporting, and once again a story no other outlet is telling.

    1. I have an idea of what’s going on at RCH — nothing illegal, but scandalous nonetheless. It will take some serious digging, though, before I can publish.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      “That’s how profit-making enterprises sometimes do it, but one is sorry to see it emulated by those who posture such lofty motives.”

      So, are you implying the difference between Private Equity firms and the Catholic Church is dwindling?

    3. “Explain how reducing service can increase profits”? Sounds like the newspaper business these days.

      1. There may or may not be service cutbacks, I don’t know. But that’s not what’s driving profitability. It’s likely a complicated story of regulatory gamesmanship, and I hope to get to the bottom of it.

  5. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    As part of the original deal, Bon Secours said it was going to renovate the Westhampton property and use it for a nursing school. Later, it decided that would be too costly. Now, it redeveloping it as a mixed use property (with City Council blessing) and making a lot of money off it. It looks as if Bon Secours was the only one to benefit from that Redskins deal.

    1. DJRippert Avatar

      Oh no, you’re very wrong. I can assure you that Dan Snyder is benefitting from the “Redskins deal” too.

      I wrote at the time this deal was first being discussed on BR … I’d rather deal with Bernie Madoff than Dan Snyder.

      Looks like another GreenTech like meltdown as the gub’mint tries to negotiate with crony capitalist slickers. The cronies get rich and the gub’mint tries to make excuses.

  6. I’ve never been a fan of localities “buying” jobs. How about lower taxes and regulations and make your locality a magnet for businesses to want to come into?
    Instead, politico types with some people with real world experience on a NGO try to entice the development and invariably the deals don’t pan out as promised. This one was probably made worse by the NFL going woke, the general ineptitude of the Snyder Deadskins and now abandoning the name…

    Virginia made a big deal about totally overhauling its corporate law about 35 years ago, and did a good job on the purely legal aspect, hoping to compete with Delaware. But…if serious, Virginia should have abolished the corporate tax and established a special corporate court…

    Business climate is how you get more real jobs…

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      doesn’t seem to work for Rural Va, no?

      1. How so? Explain. These areas don’t have the money to buy the jobs like the urban areas. I would go with low taxes and good schools in the rural areas. How did the world exist before all the smart people came in to help?

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          Rural areas with already low taxes and regulations and decent schools can attract businesses?

          doesn’t seem to work that well these days.

          Take Goochland, just outside of Richmond, they’d love to have more businesses, right?

          1. Larry – what is your point? Rural areas are different from urban areas. Does Goochland need to become a hellhole city? Westmoreland County? Russell County? Tazewell? Yes, they have poverty, and you will solve it with Deadskin deals? Did Bentonville Arkansas do special incentives to get Sam Walton to come up with Walmart? There are tradeoffs. Maybe many people are happier with the slower pace and the greater sense of community. Maybe those “rubes” know money can’t buy happiness. Maybe someone locally will recognize the opportunities and transform a town and benefit the county and region. But you can’t snap your fingers and all the government deals are just graft. Osage Energy in Hopewell? How about Solyndra under Obama? How exactly did Terry McAwful make his money? (I don’t know, but I think it was some of graft…)

          2. LarrytheG Avatar

            My point is that rural areas have low tax rates and tend to less strict on rules for businesses…but they still don’t really attract major businesses…

            It’s not political about Obama or Terry , GOP or DEM – just that I was reacting to this: ” I’ve never been a fan of localities “buying” jobs. How about lower taxes and regulations and make your locality a magnet for businesses to want to come into?”

            I thought rural areas did this better…no?

Leave a Reply