Bacon's Rebellion

As if we needed further proof of Barnie’s motto, “No good deed goes unpunished,” Habitat for Humanity homeowners in NVA are being overwhelmed by property tax increases. As noted in this Washington Post piece, the homeowners couldn’t benefit from the increases in their home’s value even if they wanted to, due to restrictions placed by Habitat.

One house built in Alexandria in 1999 has more than doubled in value since it was built and is now worth a half-million dollars. The monthly house payment, which includes real estate taxes, is up from $515 to $954 in the past 18 months — chiefly because of higher taxes.

Some jurisdictions are taking measures to reduce the tax burden on Habitat homeowners, but this is yet another example of a problem with local property taxes.

I enjoyed this Roanoke Times story on General Assembly pages. It’s a little disconcerting that so many of these great learning experiences go to students from politically connected families, but I suppose that’s to be expected. The article mentioned a few pages who went on to teaching or legal positions–I wonder if any former pages later were elected to the legislature.

I also wonder if Barnie used to ask his pages to look for additional hornet nests around Capitol Square ….

The Washington Post has done it again. They wasted front page, above the fold positioning and two full inside pages in Section A on another counter productive story on commuting. All the color, graphics, an expensive poll and lots of data wasted.

The two experts quoted told it as it is: “… transportation systems are breaking down … not able to provide minimum level of service …” (VDOT) “… nothing we can do … (when) people are making all the wrong choices…” (Federal District)

There was nothing in the story to help commuters start to make the right choices. There is data that some have made changes to improve their own commuting situation. Think how bad it would be without those intelligent changes.

When the reporter asked what we thought of the poll results we said it was just what you could expect from uninformed citizens. We then suggested that both government and the media shared the blame for not informing the public. They did not print that.

See our column “The Commuting Problem” 17 Jan 2005 at db4.dev.baconsrebellion.com and community scale news coverage that is much more to the point available at www.citizenet.com Search for “Living Here, Working There.”

EMR

…discrimination against any class of people for any reason in the Constitution of Virginia? I hope not.

Regardless of the “party” or candidate they would like to see win in November, fellow bloggers and all citizens should take a close look at George Fitch.

Bloggers who seem to support Mr. Kilgore’s party say he has put nothing but Business-as-Usual on the table. At the very least a strong Fitch showing will push Kilgore out of the least-common-denominator stance and cause him to show why someone should vote for him beside the fact that he is not Kaine.

For those who believe that Kaine is better than Kilgore and so they are tempted to sit out the primary (not just voting but suggesting others look at Fitch, etc.) may end up with Kilgore anyway. This is because, according to those who might support a member of Mr. Kaine’s party, he has offered nothing that will differentiate him from tweedle-dee, tweedle-dum my party/your party candidates of the past.

In a head to head contests between my party/your party candidates Republicans have won because they have come up with better slogans.

A strong showing by Fitch even without a Kaine vs. Fitch general election contest would force Kaine to show his colors.

EMR

In Federalist No. 10, James Madison said:

    “Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm.”

Given the legislative bills we saw come out of the General Assembly in Richmond this year (such as fining the wearers of droopy pants, applying outrageous penalties on drivers committing traffic offenses in the name of raising money for transportation, banning smoking across the state, and so on and so forth), I wonder whether Madison really meant to say:

    “There will be times when idiots will be at the helm!”

It’s time for some major leadership changes in the Republican House and Senate Caucuses.

Today’s Washington Post has an Amy Joyce story on the pitfalls of blogging in the workplace. Some bloggers who have said unkind words about their employers or their workplace have free expressed themselves into the unemployment line.

I suppose I am one who courts danger by occasionally blogging from work. I’ll put my productivity up against anyone’s and I am careful in writing about certain subjects, but I never write anything that I wouldn’t say to my boss or say to my whole organization in a staff meeting. But there’s the rub–the opportunities to speak frankly are few and far between. Most organizations don’t want to hear criticism, constructive or otherwise, and most subtly discourage innovate thinking or changes in time-honored practices or approaches. The “go along to get along” mentality is very strong.

Nonetheless, I’ve been surprised that blogs are almost exclusively the province of individuals who are not in positions of authority. In most organizations, much time is wasted at the water cooler wondering what the boss is thinking, what plans are being hatched, and what the organization’s leaders are really trying to accomplish. A boss with a blog and a vision could change the dynamics of an organization overnight.

Sadly, few private businesses, even the most successful, have a leader bold enough to share his/her ideas, observations, and passion on a regular basis. It’s also a lot of real work, not something to blow off on a subordinate.

I know that at one time Gov. Warner’s staff at least thought about him having a blog. Imagine if he did! Over the heads of the media, through the information barriers set up by the cabinet secretaries, past the tea leaf reading agency directors, and straight to the state employees who do or are supposed to do the work, straight to citizens, unfiltered–it would be amazing.

It would also be dangerous in this time when no utterance goes unrecorded or unnoticed by crack oppo researchers. It is said that the GOP has a treasure trove of questionable Howard Dean plain-speaking, recorded when he was a Governor trying to discuss issues as if he was just a regular Joe. When he turned out not to be the nominee, they didn’t need it.

Maybe someday we’ll see an organization with a leader whose primary means of communication with his/her far-flung empire is a blog. I’d like to be there.

Jim, looks like you’re making a living from the well-trod “Virginia as a National Laughingstock” beat.

When this droopy-drawers thing came out, I tried to look beyond the inanity of the measure to the social context. This sounded like something akin to the message Bill Cosby has been sending. Lord knows most of us nod our heads when Cosby sounds off and credit him with having a point. Everyone here at Bacon’s Rebellion was too busy guffawing to discuss that issue; thankfully, Reporterette gave me a smidgen of validation, albeit in a comment on the excellent Sic Semper Tyrannis.

Now, given the background offered by Barnie (story and comments)and the calls for changes in the Republican leadership by both Barnie and Phil (comments), I think we ought to stop the laughing, stop the one-liners, and seriously start to consider what this sordid episode really means.

I saw the excerpts of Del. Spruill’s speech criticizing his fellow Democratic Delegate Algie Howell and was surprised it did not raise more eyebrows. I don’t know whether it’s the Democrats who don’t have their caucus in order or Speaker Howell who doesn’t have the House in order, or whether it’s a little of both, but somehow members of this historic institution let a perfectly preventable spectacle occur under a national microscope. When the BBC starts calling Christina Nukols of the Virginian-Pilot for a story on the absurd shenanigans of our General Assembly, there has been a failure of enormous proportions.

Can this General Assembly be saved?

This from Jay Leno:

The state of Virginia has now passed a law that calls for a $50 fine for anyone who displays their underwear in a lewd or indecent manner. They’re calling this new law “Just say no to crack”.

Imagine that you can’t show your underwear in Virginia. Let me tell you something – the plumbers union is really going to fight this one! They have their lobbyists in Washington right now.

This from Ferguson (whoever he is):

In Virginia lawmakers are considering a law banning people from wearing pants that reveal their underwear in a lude way. Of course you could get by this law by just not wearing any underwear.

1778…Voltaire welcomed back to Paris after 28-year exile. Trouble started in 1717 when he was arrested for satirical poem La Henriade (an assault on politics and religion–my kind of man!). Spent a year in the Bastille Big House. On the lam because of his writings for decades after that. (Let that be a lesson to you, Jim Bacon!)

1805…Sacagawea, who pulled Lewis and Clark’s chestnuts out of the fire more than once, gives bith to her first child, Jean Baptiste Charbonneau (those Baptists horn in everywhere!) Her husband bought her from Hidatsa kidnappers the year before. Back in those days, you could still get a bargain!

1861…Lincoln leaves his crib in Springfield, headed to Washington to be sworn in. Things didn’t go as well as they could have. He returned on a funeral train four years later.

1945…Yalta conference ends. ‘Uncle Joe’ Stalin swindles Churchill and Roosevelt on the dividing up of eastern Europe and North Korea. (You could never trust a son-of-a-bitch like him in a card game!)

The state Senate may have struck down the infamous “drawers” bill, but not in time to save Virginia from becoming a national object of ridicule. Here’s political humorist Andy Borowitz in today’s Borowitz report:

VIRGINIA BANS MARRIAGE BETWEEN COUPLES WHO WEAR DROOPY PANTS
Low-riding Pants Fanciers March on Capitol

In its latest effort to protect the sanctity of traditional marriage, the Virginia House of Delegates today passed a law banning marriage between two people who wear low-riding pants.

The law, which passed by a nearly unanimous vote, would make it illegal for two people to marry if they wear “pants that reveal unwelcome glimpses of their underwear, or worse.”

In the words of Delegate Marcia Tobey, the bill’s author, “I think most sensible people would agree that traditional marriage is defined as a union between two people who wear their pants cinched tightly at the waist.” More.

Fat chance choirboy Timmy is going to rumble with those left-wing Deaniacs.

Word of advice: Don’t hold your breath for Howard Dean staying in the DNC for very long either. Dean had contemplated running for the Senate seat held by Jeffords in 2006. But Dean still wants to run for President and Kerry is no threat to Dean if he controls the funding for his friends in the Blue States and the liberal minorities in the Red States.

Today, CNN reported on Howard Dean at the DNC convention said: “I’m trying to be restrained in my new role,” Dean said with a mischievous grin. “I may be looking for a three-piece suit … He paused and then burst out laughing.

“Fat chance!” said Dean.

By unanimous voice vote, the Senate Courts of Justice Committee this afternoon rendered merciful death to this, the dumbest piece of legislation (and that’s saying a lot) to ever pass out of the Virginia House of Delegates, and in so doing, seared itself endearingly into the hearts and memories of millions around the world.

Many bloggers exist to serve as a counterpoint to the “mainstream media.” It has always surprised me how few of them take advantage of the opportunity to directly ask questions of the reporters and pundits they criticize.

The Washington Post frequently has reporters, commentators, and newsmakers taking questions online. Today the Virginian-Pilot will have General Assembly reporters Warren Fiske and Christina Nuckols taking questions at noon.

For once, I’m on the road and will miss the festivities. Wonder if anyone will ask about the “crack” bill?

This morning, I read this ditty about Senator Creigh Deed from George Loper’s Charlottesville web site and have attached the latest Equality Virginia press release as well.



Any thoughts, or comments, or bacon bits?



Per Loper email: In May of 2004 Creigh blasted GOP legislators for a “mean-spirited and unnecessary” bill banning gay marriage and legal contracts between unmarried partners.” At the time, he was reported as opposing gay marriage and supporting a different version of the Senate bill, to which Warner added amendments limiting its impact on legal contracts. See http://george.loper.org/~george/archives/2004/May/979.html

On February 7 of 2005 Creigh voted for a constitutional amendment [SJ337] stating:

“That only a union between one man and one woman may be a marriage valid in or recognized by this Commonwealth and its political subdivisions. This Commonwealth and its political subdivisions shall not create or recognize a legal status for relationships of unmarried individuals that intends to approximate the design, qualities, significance, or effect of marriage.”

Voting yea were: Bell, Blevins, Bolling, Chichester, Colgan, Cuccinelli, Deeds, Devolites Davis, Hanger, Hawkins, Houck, Martin, Miller, Mims, Newman, Norment, Obenshain, O’Brien, Potts, Puckett, Quayle, Rerras, Reynolds, Ruff, Stolle, Stosch, Wagner, Wampler, Watkins, Williams – 30.

Voting nay were: Edwards, Howell, Lambert, Locke, Lucas, Marsh, Puller, Saslaw, Ticer, Whipple – 10.



Asked about his position on SJ337, he said:

“I believe marriage is uniquely a matter of state law and that marriage is the union between one man and one woman.”

“In committee, I voted for an amendment to take out the second sentence of the amendment,” but was outvoted. He said his objection to the second sentence was that “it takes the peoples’ branch of government out of consideration about whether contracts are similar to marriage and throws it into the courts.”



When it came before the floor, he said he “had to make a decision” and “wanted people to have a choice.”

Assuming that the bill is passed, it will have to go before a second session of the Virginia General Assembly in 2006, before going to the ballot as a voter referendum.



Please send your thoughts about Creigh’s vote to [email protected] where the most representative comments will be placed on my web site with full attribution.

Given the fact that the amendment will probably come again before the Virginia General Assembly and also the fact that Creigh is running for AG, you might want to drop him a line yourself. His email address is [email protected] His phone number at the VA Gen Assembly is 804-698-7525.





Per Equality Virginia Press Release: EV NewsFebruary 9, 2005

Virginia’s New #1 Ranking: Most Anti-Gay State in Nation?



(Richmond, Virginia) Virginia moved farther along the path to becoming the most anti-gay state in the nation as the 2005 General Assembly arrived at the mid-point of the legislative session.

Proposals to constitutionalize a ban on same sex marriage, civil unions and domestic partnerships have powered through both houses of the legislature on lop-sided votes. Other legislation that would have made Virginia only the second state to prohibit “homosexuals” from adopting children and directed local school officials to ban student organizations that provide support to gay and lesbian teens have been modified in the legislative process but are still under consideration.

“Virginia has real problems to fix, like growing traffic congestion, the health care crisis, job losses in Southwest and Southside Virginia and underperforming schools. It’s shameful that our legislators have spent their time this session fiddling with the constitution, and otherwise being quite creative in attempting to deny tax-paying gay and lesbian Virginians equal protection under the law. This is the worst case of ‘piling on’ seen in decades,” said Dyana Mason, Equality Virginia Executive Director. “It’s obvious that our opponents feel threatened by the progress made towards equality in recent years, here and around the country.”

Virginia has had a law banning same sex marriage since 1986, which has been strengthened twice since, most recently with the passage of HB 751 passed just last year. There has never been a case in which Virginia’s definition of marriage has been challenged. Despite this fact, legislative sponsors argue that there is an urgent need to act to change the constitution to protect Virginia’s definition of marriage from some unspecified threat posed by judges in Massachusetts and California.

“This argument shows how little moral force there is behind the arguments of marriage amendment proponents. The reality is that any threat to Virginia’s definition of marriage is posed, not by unknown rogue judges or gay and lesbian Virginians seeking to forge recognized, committed relationships, but by other factors, such as poverty, lack of commitment to stated religious and moral vows, and the divorce rate,” said Equality Virginia Board Chair, Joseph R. Price.

Prior to the start of the session, Equality Virginia hired a professional lobbyist, started organizing grassroots Community Action Teams in districts across the state, and organized the largest ever gay and lesbian Lobby Day attended by over 250 volunteer activists. The growing strength of Equality Virginia and its supporters has already had an impact this session and is reflected in the changes made to moderate the proposed adoption and Gay Straight Alliance bills.

Equality Virginia and allied groups are also currently organizing a set of community meetings statewide to update our members and supporters on the actions taken by the General Assembly, and encourage them to get involved.

“We will continue to bring to bear on the legislative process the collective power of Equality Virginia and our allies, Virginians of reason and faith, who oppose discrimination in all of its forms,” said David Lampo, Chair of the Political Committee of Equality Virginia.

-30-