• Virginiaโ€™s Directionally Challenged Democrats

    Iโ€™m not one to regularly quote the Washington Post, but Sundayโ€™s editorial by Melanie Scaborough really draws the distinction in the ideologies of the Political Parties and clearly shows why the Democrats have lost their majority status in our State.

    This Op-Ed examined the legislative bills proposed by both Democrat and Republican members of the Northern Virginia Delegation. It gives credit to Sen. Ken Cuccinelli, R- Fairfax, for having โ€œsponsored some of this yearโ€™s most common-sense legislation โ€“ including a bill that would tie the growth of state spending to population plus inflation.” (Emphasis added)

    This is commonly referred to as the Taxpayers Bill of Rights (TABOR) and itโ€™s modeled after the Colorado law that is widely credited for controlling government spending in that state and for returning billion of dollars to the tax payers in the form of permanent tax cuts. Of course such legislation is anathema to the tax-and-spenders in the State Senate, including a good percentage of the Republican majority, as it would deprive them from the ability to squander taxpayer dollars on pork barrel from which they derive their political power.

    The article concludes by making this very insightful observation:

    If Northern Virginia liberals believe it is a moral imperative to pay high tax rates, why not live in Washington instead of lower-taxed Virginia?
    They send to Richmond representatives who vote for the sort of policies that ruined the District — and from which Virginia suburbanites have tried to escape.


  • No Rules, Just Right

    The Daily Press has a big story today on the pay of the Executive Director of the Virginia Port Authority. The General Assembly alloted $127,615 for the post but Gov. Warner and the Port Authority Board set the pay at $275,615 without following procedures outlined in state law.

    This is not a big deal–it’s a big job and the salary is apparently competitive–but it’s another example of the tin ear some in the Warner Administration have about pay and perks. It’s the “we took a pay cut to join state government” mentality. The Port Authority Board has now promised it will hold public hearings on future pay raises for the Executive Director.

    Del. Vince Callahan, R-Fairfax, chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, got it right: “I don’t have any problem with the board paying him a competitive salary, considering what these football and basketball coaches are making. But we have created certain guidelines and provisions. If they don’t follow them, they’re on tenuous ground.”


  • Hot or Hype?

    Becky Dale pointed me to this news story in the Manassas Journal Messenger. Despite all the talk about rising real estate assessments and homeowner unrest, Prince William County has apparently not seen any increase in the number of calls to its assessment office. Could this be less of an issue than either Kaine or Kilgore imagined?


  • Reading Assignment

    If you’re into media watching and substance, you can read One Man’s Trash right now or you can read Virginia Pundit Watch tomorrow in the new issue of the Bacon’s Rebellion e-zine. Or you could do both.


  • Another Look at Blogging

    When bloggers aren’t chasing the same political story, they’re gazing into their collective navels on the subject of blogging.

    Prolific Chris Graham of the Augusta Free Press recently did a widely linked story on Virginia blogging’s potential impact on this fall’s election, including interviews with John Behan and Rick Sincere. A companion piece should be this Jack Schaefer article in Slate. Schaefer, who’s been in the media criticism business longer than any blogger, praises blogs for opinion writing and compares them to mainstream journalists this way:

    To stretch a manufacturing analogy, unsalaried bloggers represent low-cost Chinese laborers, professional journalists the well-paid-with-benefits American workers. Given the right tools and infrastructure, low-cost Chinese labor can produce work that is every bit the equal of the high-price kind. What the Web has done is remove the barriers to entry from opinion journalism, much to the benefit of readers.


  • Fitch Struggles for Recognition

    GOP gubernatorial candidate George Fitch has finally garnered some ink in the Richmond Times-Dispatch, although the lead of today’s article by Tyler Whitley could not be what he was hoping for: “Fitch struggles for recognition in his GOP bid to be governor”.

    Fitch has loads of ideas for cutting costs and taxes, Whitley wrote, but he can’t get them out because he lacks money and a campaign organization. The Warrenton mayor “soldiers on, usually driving by himself in his Ford Taurus, talking with whomever will listen about ‘the Warrenton miracle.’ While Kilgore has raised more than $5 million, Fitch has raised only $140,000 — mostly from his own pocket.

    Given the anti-tax fervor of the Republican rank and file, I’m amazed that Fitch has attracted so little support. It does seem likely that Fitch will get on the primary ballot, at least, so Republicans will at least be able to register a protest vote against the Business As Usual wing of the GOP.


  • Publisher’s Note to Bloggers

    Dear Bacon’s Rebellion Bloggers,

    I have been gratified by the response to the Bacon’s Rebellion blog. It has more than fulfilled my hope that it would become a forum for the exchange of perspectives on issues of importance to Virginians. The quality of the commentary has been high, and participants have largely honored the spirit of collegiality that I would like to maintain. Even though we often disagree–and disagree vigorously–we can debate facts and logic without engaging in ad hominem attacks.

    The Bacon’s Rebellion blog started as an experiment, just to see what would happen. In just a couple of months, the blog clearly has become something worth building upon. Unfortunately, as popularity has increased, we seem to be running into bandwidth problems. A number of participants have experienced difficulty posting and commenting on the blog. Blogger is fine for a free service, but, let’s face it, you get what you pay for. My first priority is to migrate to a superior blogging platform.

    If anyone can suggest a superior blogging service that charges reasonable rates, please let me know. Also, if any of you can recommend particular features that a good blogging service should have, please let me know.

    Jim Bacon
    Publisher
    Bacon’s Rebellion


  • Senate audio of debate on Potts

    Courtesy of the Sic Semper Tyrannis blog, you can listen to the audio file of the Senate debate on ousting Potts from his committee chairmanship.

    Listen to Senator’s Sasslaw and Norment coming to the rescue of their embattled breathern, the โ€œIndependent Republican.โ€ I can understand Sasslaw, who is an unabashed liberal. But Norment ran as a conservative Republican and has spoken against Pottsโ€™ independent run.

    Obviously, Kaine, the Democrats, and the RINOs must be convinced that Pottsโ€™ candidacy will detract votes from the Republican candidate in November. Otherwise, they wouldnโ€™t be going out of their way to protect Potts…


  • Laboratory of Budget Cutting

    Richmond Mayor Doug Wilder’s budget proposal, cutting or eliminating funding to a number of identified economic development, cultural, and historic organizations, offers this blog debating society a little laboratory in which to test our beliefs about government.

    Richmond is the capital city, so everyone in the Old Dominion has something of a stake in the city’s budget. The city has a major newspaper that we expect will cover developments thoroughly. There are city blogs like River City Rapids that will provide additional insight, as it has already. The manageable number of organizations that have been cut represent a good cross-section of the types of things government funds. Several of the organizations facing cuts are high-powered, with friends in high places, so they will have the wherewithal to make their case in the media as well as in the proverbial backrooms.

    How much of Wilder’s cutting will those who fulminate against government spending in the abstract accept? How will those who generally favor more spending and more government justify these programs? I think it will be interesting and I invite my colleagues and all our readers to follow developments and test our commitments on this real world example.


  • The Potts Report

    What is the Potts for Governor campaign up to? Until now, it seemed to be based exclusively on the media’s fascination with Republicans trying to oust Potts from the party. While that’s “good copy,” as they say, I’m rather old-fashioned, believing a campaign ought to be about the candidate, his or her ideas, and his or her organization. I’ve been scanning the news for some dispatch that might illuminate any real substance in the Potts campaign

    As if in answer to my prayers, an April 6th Brian McNeill story in the Fairfax Connection sheds a keyhole-sized light on the Winchester Senator’s ideas and progress.

    Potts has priorities and a hierarchy of values:

    Should Potts be elected governor, one of his top priorities would be to overhaul the state’s tax code, which has not been comprehensively revised since 1938. By ensuring all Virginians are paying their fair share, he said, revenue could be generated for long-term transportation and education solutions.

    He also said that he, unlike Kaine or Kilgore, is open to increasing the gas tax, which has remained at 17.5 cents per gallon for nearly two decades.

    “I hate taxes, but I love Virginia more,” he said.

    He doesn’t think much of the Kaine and Kilgore proposals to help lower local real estate taxes:

    “I’ve seen this whole no-tax, no-roads, no-schools, no-hope vision play out,” he said. “They’re adamantly opposed to any investment in Virginia.”

    The Potts organization appears to humming right along. They have collected “roughly” 5,000 signatures to get him on the ballot.

    McNeill’s apparent take? “One thing is certain. Potts plans to stir things up over the next seven months.” That view is based on this Potts observation and declaration: “The most dangerous candidate is the one who isn’t afraid to lose. Believe me, I’m not afraid to lose.”

    Tax-happy warrior Potts indeed poses a danger, but right now I’d say it’s more to his own campaign’s viability than to Kaine or Kilgore.


  • Could Candidate Plans be … Defensible?

    The top issue in the gubernatorial campaign so far are the Kaine and Kilgore proposals relating to local real estate tax assessments. From the People’s Republic of Arlington, via the Richmond Times-Dispatch, comes a sensible “Correspondent of the Day” letter on the subject from Wayne Kubicki. Kubicki is a member of a citizen’s advisory board in the county.

    Kubicki’s main point:

    Year-to-year comparisons in Arlington for the past four years show that residential assessments have risen three to four times faster than commercial assessments. Over this period, the tax burden did shift–away from commercial properties, and onto homeowners. Both the Kaine and Kilgore proposals are attempts to remedy this.

    Kubicki comments on reactions to the plans from the Virginia Municipal League and the Virginia Chamber of Commerce.

    I’m impressed. No apparent partisan ax to grind, no hysterical claim that Virginia will become Mississippi if one of these plans is adopted. Maybe Jerry and Tim aren’t so bad after all.


  • RINOs on Parade

    For an inside account of what actually went on at the State Senate yesterday when they considered ousting Sen. Potts from his committee chairmanship for having left the Republican party, please read Sen. Ken Cuccinelliโ€™s account.

    The State Senate RINOs (Republican’s in Name Only) showed their true colors yesterday, refusing to vote for appealing Lt. Gov. Tim Kaineโ€™s ruling. And what a ruling that was! Kaine held that the Constitution doesnโ€™t allow the Senate to consider any other businessโ€”such as enforcing their own Senate rulesโ€”during the veto session. Howโ€™s this for ducking an issue?

    And this is the guy who wants to be our next Governor?

    Sen. Cuccinelliโ€™s newsletter only provides the names of the Senators that voted with him in his motion to appeal Kaineโ€™s ruling. It omits the names of the RINOs, which Iโ€™m posting below for everyone to see.

    Blevins, Harry B.
    Chichester, John H.
    Devolites Davis, Jeannemarie
    Hanger, Emmett W., Jr.
    Hawkins, Charles R.
    Mims, Bill
    Norment, Thomas K., Jr.
    Potts, H. Russell, Jr.
    Quayle, Frederick M.
    Stolle, Kenneth W.
    Stosch, Walter A.
    Wagner, Frank W.
    Wampler, William C., Jr.
    Watkins, John
    Williams, Martin E.

    Those of you that vote Republican, should write down these names and carry them with your voting card.


  • Great Moments in Blogrolling

    The Jaded JD, who runs a pretty tight ship, has added Bacon’s Rebellion to his rather exclusive blogroll. I, for one, am very gratified. Not only is The Jaded JD full of substantive posts, it also has a crisp new Typepad format with mood indicator.

    Of course, I’m one bump from falling off the turnip truck. I had no idea that “Puss Rots” was a BR contributor. I share the JD’s feelings about what that sort of moniker indicates.

    Update: Oops! The Jaded JD had us confused with someone else on the “Puss Rots” thing. That changed his mood to “chagrined,” which I think is an overreaction. I apologize to my colleagues for even thinking that “Puss Rots” blogged among us.


  • The Veto Session

    In my continuing efforts to waste your time, here’s my summary of yesterday’s veto session: Warner rules the roost and Potts has a license to thumb his nose at the Republican Party.

    Perhaps the real waste of time was the veto session itself; why did they bother? Without debating the merits of each individual action, the General Assembly obviously didn’t have much of a stake in their previous work when they agreed to 42 of 44 amendments to legislation and 28 of 30 budget amendments.

    “Bi-partisanship” is alive and well in Virginia. Heck, you can almost be in three parties at the same time if you’re Russ Potts.


  • A WASTE OF TIME

    Discussing the three alternatives for the Tri-County Parkway (New Asphalt Battleground) is a perfect example of why posting a blog about many topics is a pure waste of time and effort. And so, perhaps, is pointing out that it is a waste of time.

    The three “alternative” alignments have nothing in common except they were put on the same map to keep VDOT staff busy since there is no money to build anything. With planning like this no sane citizen will authorize funds โ€“ recall the sales tax vote of two years ago. Two of the alignments never get to a third county.

    Paul is absolutely right about needing roads if you are talking about the alignment (“Plan C”) that has been on all three County Plans for 20 years. This one, however, runs near the homes of well connected activists in Fairfax County and will be dead on arrival as soon as someone counts the votes.

    The other primary alignment (“Plan A”) is a life line for speculative owners of tens of thousands of acres of land in Prince William County north of Manassas National Battlefield Park and in the part of eastern Loudoun County known as “the transition area.” Without it, they cannot make a profit building out their holdings. Some have already indicated they will kick in money to lower the cost. They will also make significant political contributions if any candidate bites on the “just shoot up here amongst us we need some relief” logic.

    Plan B is just there to give a shred of credence to including A in a “Tri County” alternatives study. A and B are pure cases of the reality that building more roads without Fundamental Change in settlement patterns makes mobility worse, not better. Every VDOT study of roads in the Plan A alignment has shown a roadway generates more new traffic than it can serve. In other words Jim is absolutely right too.

    Let us stop wasting time and all agree that the first step is to create a plan for Balanced Communities inside the Clear Edge and then decide what transport system will provide access and mobility. Reality Check made it crystal clear that if all the stakeholders are at the table a rational plan is possible and it will require none of the subsidy that is now paid by every citizen and every enterprise and institution for dysfunctional human settlement patterns.

    EMR