Category Archives: Insurance

The Cooch’s Freak Show Dream Team

cooch dream teamBy Peter Galuszka

Ken Cuccinelli just can’t keep away from the bizarre, but perhaps that’s what makes him what he is.

He stages a convention instead of a primary to neuter Bill Bolling. And since a convention is smaller, it draws more GOP hard-righters than  June bugs on a humid night and they succeed in getting Bishop E.W. Jackson and Mark Obenshain selected. They underline the social conservatism that turns millions off and makes Virginia the butt of jokes on late night talk shows.

The Bishop is an even bigger gay basher than Cuccinelli and says that Planned Parenthood is responsible for more fatalities among African-Americans than the Ku Klux Klan. This may be new to a Harvard Law graduate, but women of any color have a legal right to an abortion within limits. The U.S. Supreme Court said so. Look under Roe vs. Wade.

Then there is the attorney general candidate Mark Obenshain of the legacy Republican family. He proposed and withdrew legislation to require any woman in Virginia who miscarries a pregnancy to report it to the police. The idea is so repulsive it is beyond words. A woman may have miscarried to her great sorrow due to medical reasons and then would have to go through the added horror of having to report to the police? Yes, this comes from a cabal that otherwise wants to keep the government out of your lives. Even Josef Stalin wouldn’t think of this.

What does the dream team have to say on the many policy issues facing a troubled state? We have a bunch of lame and poorly thought out tax cuts and Cooch playing hardware store populist. Cuccinelli was against McDonnnell’s mammoth road building tax plan and has since backed away from his opposition.

Is this good news for Terry McAuliffe, who has plenty of issues of his own? Yes, I would think. Cuccinelli doesn’t need the fringe hard right voters. He’s already got them in his pocket. He needs the center and Mark and the Bishop aren’t going to be much help there.

It boggles the mind how Virginia is so schizo. It is attracting hundreds of thousands of newcomers who are running the state’s economy and are dragging it into the 21st century world. Yet the Republicans put up people like this who aren’t dragging us to Virginia’s recent dark past but to medieval times.

Global investors might think twice or three times before investing in this freak show.

Data Shows Hospital Billing Outrages

Hospital BillBy Peter Galuszka

It’s long been fascinating how Big Hospitals, linked with Medicare, Big Pharma and Big Managed Care, have come up with an extraordinarily convoluted system of setting prices for various hospital procedures.

There is plenty of nonsense about including on this blog about bringing “free market efficiencies” to health care, as if human health is something like a widget or a jet engine fan blade that can be made cheaper and faster if you only got the right consulting firm to hit the right formula and the right software and the right system and the right package and kept the evil government out of it, everything would come up roses.

So to see how stupid and impractical the idea is, I was amused to see the big data base release on hospital cost charges for various procedures by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. It covers what was billed and what was paid by hundreds of hospitals for 100 procedures.

Big Health Care did not want the data released because they prefer working in an office with the shutters drawn as they try to game the Medicare system by overbilling and then cutting secretive deals with Big Managed Care over what they’ll really charge for group policy holders and screw the rest.

President Obama had the CMMS release the data to show what a sham setting hospital prices is, although it is doubtful that ObamaCare that goes into full effect next year will change things much. I believe more and more that socialized medicine is the only way to go.

Anyway, here is a short piece I did for Style Weekly that looks at what Richmond area hospitals actually charge for Medicare and what they get:

If you’re a Medicare patient and need a major joint replaced — perhaps a hip — consider the initial cost.

In 2011, HCA Healthcare’s CJW Medical Center billed Medicare $117,477 and got about $12,926 from the government. Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center billed $55,327 and got $20,308. Bon Secours Memorial Hospital charged $53,195, and got $12,458.

Sound screwy? It is. For all the talk about a free-market system, setting health care prices is anything but.

Instead of open bidding, think of hospital officials meeting behind closed doors, strategizing how much to charge to get reimbursed. Medicare, which usually represents about half of a hospital’s revenues, sets a fixed rate for various procedures. But hospitals can’t by law offer a specific set of prices for just Medicare.

So they factor in other price variables such as what insurance companies might pay on a percentage basis. A big insurer may pay only 20 percent of charges or what they negotiate privately. That automatically jacks up the asking price. Another variable is getting financial aid to help pick up the bill for indigents.

Moreover, higher prices don’t necessarily mean better quality, says Michael Spine, senior vice president for business development at Bon Secours Health System.

What results is an incredibly skewed set of prices for essentially the same procedures. That’s the takeaway from a survey by the federal Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which shows what hospitals billed Medicare — and what Medicare paid — for procedures in 100 categories in 2011. The Obama administration released the survey to drum up support for the Affordable Health Care Act, which takes full effect next year.

A glance at the survey shows that CJW Medical Center was by far the priciest on some procedures, but also reimbursed the least.

Take kidney-tract infections, for example. CJW filed $30,552 while MCV asked for $19,819. Yet MCV got more. For some heart-failure cases, HCA billed $40,274 while St. Mary’s Hospital, owned by nonprofit Bon Secours, billed $18,460. And St. Mary’s was reimbursed more. Go figure.

Because insurance companies base policies around what Medicare is billed and will pay for, just about everyone’s affected. Those without insurance could be stuck with the entire bill, although they can receive treatment free or through discounts.

“Hospital charges vary because they reflect the individual hospital’s mission, the patient population it serves and the subsidies necessary to provide essential public services,” says Anne Buckley, a spokeswoman for VCU Medical Center.

Mark Foust, a spokesman for HCA, says a “patient’s medical coverage — rather than charges — is what primarily drives what he or she pays a hospital.”

HCA and VCU help poor patients with their bills through discount or charity programs. So does Bon Secours, says Spine, who adds that releasing the results of such surveys is an important step in moving from “legacy” pricing to something more transparent.

Next on Obama’s list: releasing surveys of physicians’ fees.

McAuliffe: Can a Schmoozer Transform?

By Peter Galuszka

On Easter Sunday, I was driving in a cold rain to Charlottesville for a family event. My cell phone started beeping with messages from Democratic gubernatorial hopeful Terry McAuliffe.

He said he was on his way to his own family brunch but wanted to tap me for $5. I got similar messages from two other staffers.

Why bother me at Easter? Political analyst Larry Sabato wondered the same thing. In a tweet that day he complained about finding “11 obnoxious messages for $$$. Now I know the answer to the age old Q; Is nothing sacred?”

And that may be McAuliffe’s biggest problem as he faces arch-conservative Ken Cuccinelli in the off-year governor’s race. In my profile of him in Style Weekly, I note that McAuliffe is trying to rein in an expansive personality that has made him a top political schmoozer and fundraiser for Democrats from Jimmy Carter to Bill and Hillary Clinton.

A decades’ long political operative who has never been in elected office, he can be bombastic and smooth, as his recent dealings with GreenTech Automotive shows. He flirted with Virginia for a hybrid  car plant before going to Mississippi. He has been accused of somehow using the car plant to win special visas for foreign workers and maybe misleading the Virginia Economic Development Partnership about his intentions in the Old Dominion.

Meanwhile, he must overcome some of his misunderstandings of traditional Virginia thinking. However, it’s probably a good thing that he’s going to skip the Shad Planking in Wakefield tonight with its Confederate flags where Cuccinelli will be keynote speaker.

While polls are about 50-50 in the race, McAuliffe’s fundraising prowess has shown brightly. In the first quarter, he raised more than $5 million — more than double the take of Cuccinelli, who has hamstrung by not being allowed raise money during the General Assembly session because of his position as Attorney General. Read on…

(Also, here as a Q&A with McAuliffe)

The Lessons of the 2013 General Assembly

By Peter Galuszka

If there’s any good news from the 2013 General Assembly session, it is that the hard right’s strange hold on taxation has been broken. Republicans can start acting like responsible adults once again instead of dogmatic shills or spoiled children.

Gov. Robert F. Donnell and legislators found a way to raise badly needed money for transportation although it came via a very bad law that ties itself up like a contortionist doing this and that when all that needed to be done was to simply raise the gasoline tax for the first time in 26 years.

The Democrats were right to strong-arm McDonnell into going along with expanding Medicaid. It would have been absolutely ridiculous for Virginia to hold its stubborn head high and deny thousands of needy people medical assistance so they can feel good about some ludicrous oath from Grover Norquist they may have recited at one point to get votes. The feds will be paying for the expansion until 2016 and then for 90 percent of it. Imagine a well fed delegate saying, “No, you poor person can’t have health care because it is doctrinally impure!”

The upshot is is that we need to get of the Grover Norquists, the Tea Baggers and all their ilk to get on with the serious business of running the state and country. The sequestration debacle is more than embarrassing for its stupidity. So is Kenneth Cuccinelli with Bob Marshall cheering him to to find any bogus constitutional challenge to anything he finds political impure as far as taxation.

The bottom line is that if you want fixed roads, good schools and a decent place to live, you have to pay for them through taxes. Simple. You can’t depend on private industry to see you through, especially not when a good chunk of it in the Old Dominion is actually federal government money that’s about to be cut off in a big way. You can’t do it through little shell games with public private partnerships to build roads you often do not need. And you just can’t kick the can to younger generations so you can remain holy.

In other words, the days of the Tea Party, “Boomergeddon” and all the clarion calls to the need for budget cutting are over. They’ve been over for a while. We get it. We’ve been spending too much. But it is idiotic to go cold turkey without some thought given to it because you will crash the economy and die of the DTs. You don’t cure a crash victim by denying him blood. That’s not voodoo economics, that’s vampire economics. You need a balance and that’s exactly what the Boomergeddons and Baconauts want to deny us.

As for McDonnell, well, he’s finally got his legacy. It looks pretty messy. He did manage to get more money for roads, but he did through a Rube Goldberg contraption of taxation. He has a totally wrong-headed tax on alternative vehicles which shows,once again, just how Neanderthal much of the thinking in the General Assembly is.

McDonnell failed to get legacies through privatizing state alcohol stores or erecting offshore oil rigs. Last year, the legislature got so out of control with social conservative nonsense — another Tea Party legacy — that Virginia scored on national Snark TV for its inane war against women. That cost McDonnell a hell of a lot, namely the vice presidential nomination.

Now, he’s reportedly thinking about something bigger and I gather his platform for that will be his tax victory. Good Luck.

Cuccinelli on Health Care Reform

Primum non nocere

by James A. Bacon

In his book “The Last Line of Defense,” Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli delineates his constitutional views as the state’s top lawyer and he opines on the philosophical principles that undergird his approach to public policy. But he provides few specifics on how he, as the presumed Republican candidate for governor this year, would govern if elected. Laying out a campaign platform was not his intention, of course,  as the book is not a campaign document but a description of how he and other Republican AGs fought the Obama administration’s unconstitutional erosion of state sovereignty.

However, we do get a glimpse of Cuccinelli’s thinking in one realm, that of health care. Because so much of his book is devoted to his legal battle against the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), Cuccinelli digresses briefly to discuss how to reform Virginia’s health care system if Obamacare were rendered ineffective by state action (by opting out of the Medicaid expansion and the set-up of a health insurance exchange).

As it happens, Cuccinelli’s views on the subject coincide largely with my own: First do no harm. The current system of health care in the United States is a mess, he writes. But the answer is not giving government more power. In effect he subscribes to Bacon’s axiom of political reform: Before you create new laws, regulations and programs to fix what’s broke, un-do the laws, regulations and programs that broke it in the first place.

The book treats us to no more than a bullet-point description of Cuccinelli’s market-based remedies but the proposals are suggestive. At the federal level, the AG would allow the purchase of insurance across state lines, give individuals who purchase their own insurance the same tax status as employees who purchase it through their employers, and incentivize the use of Health Savings Accounts.

That’s all fine and good (and pretty standard fare), but the governor of Virginia doesn’t have much influence over federal law. Within the realm that governors can control, Cuccinelli would:

  • Roll back the mandated benefits required for the purchase of private insurance plans;
  • Eliminate restrictions against the purchase of health insurance across state lines (presumably by means of interstate pacts);
  • Require transparency in pricing without which it is difficult for consumers to exert meaningful influence in health care markets; and
  • Put caps on malpractice liability.

I am comfortable with the first three measures but believe the fourth to be superfluous in Virginia, given the fact that the commonwealth’s malpractice laws are pretty reasonable to begin with. Also, I believe the list of needed reforms is only partial. Others include: (1) The state should create more than transparency for prices, it needs to create transparency for risk-adjusted medical outcomes, too; (2) the state should eliminate Certificates of Public Need, which restrict competition between health providers; (3) the governor should use his bully pulpit to encourage (not coerce) hospitals, physicians and other providers to embrace best practices that boost productivity and improve the quality of medical outcomes; and (4) the governor should establish the goal (a tall order, admittedly) of making Virginia the healthiest state in the country by means of such strategies, highlighted on this blog, as creating more walkable/bikeable communities, encouraging the consumption of more nutritious food, and working ceaselessly towards the goals of cleaner water and cleaner air.

I don’t sense that Cuccinelli has given these matters anywhere same the amount of thought that he has to the constitutional issues arising from Obamacare. But if he wants to govern well – and persuade others that he can govern well – he would be well advised to flesh out his ideas.

Is Virginia Uranium Quickly Running Out of Money?

By Peter Galuszka

Just how financially viable is Virginia Uranium, which appears to be losing its battle to lift a 31-year-old ban on uranium mining in Virginia?

Corporate documents filed with Canadian securities regulators state that as of last September, Virginia Energy Resources Inc., Vancouver, British Columbia-based parent of Virginia Uranium that wants to mine a 119-million pound deposit of uranium near Chatham, was having serious problems with financial losses and cash flow.

According to documents obtained through Canada’s System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR): “For the period ended September 30, 2012, the Company incurred an operating loss of $5,354,146, and has an accumulated deficit of $17,109,894, limited resources, no source of operating cash flow and no assurances that sufficient funding will continue to be available.”

For several years, Virginia Uranium has funneled cash and gifts to legislators to influence them to support ending the state’s uranium mining moratorium. The effort appeared to fall apart when State Senator John Watkins, R-Powhatan, withdrew a bill that would have ended the ban and started setting up the regulatory to allow mining. He did so before it was due before an unfriendly Senate committee that most likely would have killed it.

Lobbyists are now focusing on Republican Gov. Robert F. McDonnell to get the issue moving again before Tuesday, known as the “crossover” day or the last day in a General Assembly session that a bill in one chamber can move to the other. A bill similar to Watkins’ is in the House of Delegates but, so far, McDonnell seems to be avoiding taking a stand on uranium.

Despite having paid legislators to go on trips to France, including stopovers in Paris and Canada, to drum up support for uranium mining, there were hints that something was amiss financially. In 2011, Virginia Public Access Project records show that Virginia Uranium spent $120,000 on gifts – the most of any company in the state. This past year, that amount dropped to $107,000. With the exception of Democrat Richard Saslaw, most of the money went to Republicans.

So, big questions loom.  Would McDonnell kick start the move for Virginia Uranium as it struggles with money? Why would the General Assembly seriously consider spending millions in new expenses setting up as many as 30 new regulators to handle uranium mining?

Watkins and others have said that Virginia Uranium would pay for the cost so it won’t fall on taxpayers. But how could that happen if the firm itself seems to be running out of money?

Have HSAs Peaked in Virginia?


by James A. Bacon

After surging for several years, sales of Health Savings Account policies in Virginia dipped sharply in 2012, according to a new report by the Department of Taxation. However, the number of policies in force eroded only slightly and the number of individuals covered by those policies continued to grow, albeit more slowly.

The report offered no explanation for the sudden fall-off in new policies. The Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), enacted in 2010, ordered the creation of state-run insurance exchanges, expanded Medicaid and allowed parents to keep children on their policies until age 26. But, according to the authors of the state report, “It is unclear at this time what impact this legislation will have on HSAs.”

The report concluded that no change in state tax policy is indicated at this time. HSAs combine high-deductible tax plans with accounts funded by employee and employer contributions. A key incentive consists of allowing employees to contribute to their accounts with pre-tax dollars. Virginia already conforms to the federal treatment of contributions, earnings and distributions.

Bacon’s bottom line:  Conservatives have long touted HSAs as a pillar of consumer-directed health care, a market-based alternative to America’s health care ills. The big question, which the Department of Taxation did not address, is this: Is the sudden reversal in the sale of new policies a function of market forces or political forces? Put more exactly, have sales plummeted because the policies are unpopular in the marketplace or because the looming implementation of Obamacare is rendering them less desirable?

The logic behind HSAs is that if people have to pay for medical bills out of their own pockets, they are more likely to pay attention to price and quality, thus to shop around for better deals. HSAs vary widely in how they are implemented. Some are simple plans that let employees fend for themselves, while other plans back them up with access to telephone counseling, wellness programs and online marketplace data. In practice, however, much of the price and quality data needed to make a rational decision is unavailable or too complex for many people to understand. While HSAs probably do discourage people from frivolous use of the health care system, there is not much evidence to suggest that consumers are exerting significant pressure on health care providers.

Though a promising idea, HSAs do not appear to be sufficient on their own to alter the dynamic of ever-rising health care costs. One necessary step, which Virginia is undertaking, is to make more price and quality data available to consumers. I am not sure how rapidly that initiative is progressing nor how effective it will be when implemented. Another necessary step is for insurers to adopt the role of consumer counselor and advisor, acquainting consumers with cost and quality data and helping them interpret it. A third step is abolishing the fee-for-service method of reimbursing health care costs and encouraging innovation in how insurers compensate hospitals and physicians for providing services.

The Obamacare juggernaut may well put HSAs out of business before private players can figure out how to make consumer-directed health care work. Whether administered by the state or the federal government, Virginia will have a health-care insurance exchange beginning in 2014. My sense is that many of the companies using HSAs are small businesses that cannot afford conventional, high-dollar medical plans. Many will find it easier simply to default to the health exchange –  or let lower-income employees enroll in Medicaid — rather than deal with the hassle of shopping around and negotiating deals with private insurers.

I fear that Obamacare will snuff out the free-market alternative before it has a chance to take root. Big Government ideologues will score a big victory in the never-ending campaign against private health care.

Brace Yourself: Health Insurance Shock to Slam Virginia

And you thought Hurricane Sandy was bad?

Hey, does anyone remember President Obama’s promise that health insurance premiums would fall by $2,500 a year for a family if Congress passed Obamacare? Probably not, because that prognostication is going so woefully wrong that the mainstream media has not dropped it into the memory hole.

But Virginians will have reason to recall the president’s words soon enough if the forecast of Merrill Matthews and Mark Litow is correct. Virginia is one of a dozen low-cost states where they expect health care premiums to skyrocket in 2014 when the full impact of Obamacare is felt. How bad will the increases be? Between 65% and 100%, with the sharpest rise in the individual market and more moderate rises for employees of self-insured companies.

Writing in the Wall Street Journal, Matthews and Litow expect the dirigists in Washington to blame everyone but themselves — greedy doctors, greedy hospitals, greedy insurance companies. Funny, isn’t it, how greed seems to run so rampant in industries where the geniuses in our Imperial Capital think they can do a better job of running things than the people in the industry themselves.

— JAB

Here Comes Cooch-ageddon!

Illustration credit: Ed Harrington, Style Weekly.

Hard right conservative Kenneth T. Cuccinelli has a very good chance of becoming the next governor. At least that’s my view 11 months out.

I disagree with Cuccinelli on almost everything and will spare my readers the list. But I do agree on one thing: he has proved to be a wily politician. He’s turned the Republican establishment on its head. His likely opponent Terry McAuliffe has yet to prove himself as a viable opponent if he is indeed the Democratic choice, as he now seems he will be. Cuccinelli’s off-year race will be one of the most closely watched by the national media.

Enough talking. Read my cover story in Richmond’s Style Weekly.

Has Road Privatization Gone Frankenstein?

By Peter Galuszka

Since 1995, Virginia’s politicians  have had a ready tool that they love to use as a ruse to build roads without raising taxes: the Public Privatization Transportation Act.

Once considered a nation-beater and major step in the craze of putting private management methods and money in pubic transport projects, the PPTA was intended to supplement the usually road-building process. Money traditionally would be made available by the General Assembly and groups such as the Commonwealth Transportation Board would access construction needs on a regional basis, select projects and dole out funds.

But as skinflint state legislators refuse year after year to raise taxes (the gasoline tax hasn’t been hiked or adjusted for inflation since 1986), money for construction and maintenance just isn’t there. Not to worry, governors still are getting their pet projects funded by consolidating power in the executive branch through the use of the PPTA.

The process is morphing into something that seems more Kremlin than Thomas Jefferson. The PPTA is badly being misused, according to a report funded by the Southern Environmental Law Center. They hired state road expert James J. Regimbal to put together a scathing look at what is becoming a scary phenomenon. He recommends significant PPTA changes this General Assembly season.

(Jim Bacon has already weighed in with an earlier blog posting).

Here for your interest  is a piece I did for Style Weekly (Q&A) with Regimbal on the same theme.