Category Archives: Health care

IG of the Day: Teen Birth Rate

Source: Atlantic Cities Blog

Source: Atlantic Cities Blog

This map, posted by Richard Florida to the Atlantic Cities blog, shows state-by-state variations in the teen birth rate. Florida makes an unconvincing case that ties higher teen birth rates to the practice of religion, posture on birth control and red state governance, confusing correlation with causality. “Despite all the hectoring and moralizing,” he writes, “teen births are higher in red states and more religious states.”

Toward the end of his post, he does observe that, yes, there might also be a connection between teen birth rates and socio-economic status, and there might be a connection between teen birth rates and pockets of concentrated poverty. The culture of class is a key variable, as sociologist Charles Murray has demonstrated vividly. Florida is a brilliant guy in many ways, but it disheartens me to see him conduct such superficial analysis that tries to score cheap partisan points. Frankly, it casts a shadow over his good and valuable work.

On the other hand…. It’s good to see that Virginia has one of the lower teen birth rates in the country, a standing that I would attribute largely to the fact that it also has one of the lowest poverty rates in the country.

– JAB

The Cooch’s Freak Show Dream Team

cooch dream teamBy Peter Galuszka

Ken Cuccinelli just can’t keep away from the bizarre, but perhaps that’s what makes him what he is.

He stages a convention instead of a primary to neuter Bill Bolling. And since a convention is smaller, it draws more GOP hard-righters than  June bugs on a humid night and they succeed in getting Bishop E.W. Jackson and Mark Obenshain selected. They underline the social conservatism that turns millions off and makes Virginia the butt of jokes on late night talk shows.

The Bishop is an even bigger gay basher than Cuccinelli and says that Planned Parenthood is responsible for more fatalities among African-Americans than the Ku Klux Klan. This may be new to a Harvard Law graduate, but women of any color have a legal right to an abortion within limits. The U.S. Supreme Court said so. Look under Roe vs. Wade.

Then there is the attorney general candidate Mark Obenshain of the legacy Republican family. He proposed and withdrew legislation to require any woman in Virginia who miscarries a pregnancy to report it to the police. The idea is so repulsive it is beyond words. A woman may have miscarried to her great sorrow due to medical reasons and then would have to go through the added horror of having to report to the police? Yes, this comes from a cabal that otherwise wants to keep the government out of your lives. Even Josef Stalin wouldn’t think of this.

What does the dream team have to say on the many policy issues facing a troubled state? We have a bunch of lame and poorly thought out tax cuts and Cooch playing hardware store populist. Cuccinelli was against McDonnnell’s mammoth road building tax plan and has since backed away from his opposition.

Is this good news for Terry McAuliffe, who has plenty of issues of his own? Yes, I would think. Cuccinelli doesn’t need the fringe hard right voters. He’s already got them in his pocket. He needs the center and Mark and the Bishop aren’t going to be much help there.

It boggles the mind how Virginia is so schizo. It is attracting hundreds of thousands of newcomers who are running the state’s economy and are dragging it into the 21st century world. Yet the Republicans put up people like this who aren’t dragging us to Virginia’s recent dark past but to medieval times.

Global investors might think twice or three times before investing in this freak show.

Data Shows Hospital Billing Outrages

Hospital BillBy Peter Galuszka

It’s long been fascinating how Big Hospitals, linked with Medicare, Big Pharma and Big Managed Care, have come up with an extraordinarily convoluted system of setting prices for various hospital procedures.

There is plenty of nonsense about including on this blog about bringing “free market efficiencies” to health care, as if human health is something like a widget or a jet engine fan blade that can be made cheaper and faster if you only got the right consulting firm to hit the right formula and the right software and the right system and the right package and kept the evil government out of it, everything would come up roses.

So to see how stupid and impractical the idea is, I was amused to see the big data base release on hospital cost charges for various procedures by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. It covers what was billed and what was paid by hundreds of hospitals for 100 procedures.

Big Health Care did not want the data released because they prefer working in an office with the shutters drawn as they try to game the Medicare system by overbilling and then cutting secretive deals with Big Managed Care over what they’ll really charge for group policy holders and screw the rest.

President Obama had the CMMS release the data to show what a sham setting hospital prices is, although it is doubtful that ObamaCare that goes into full effect next year will change things much. I believe more and more that socialized medicine is the only way to go.

Anyway, here is a short piece I did for Style Weekly that looks at what Richmond area hospitals actually charge for Medicare and what they get:

If you’re a Medicare patient and need a major joint replaced — perhaps a hip — consider the initial cost.

In 2011, HCA Healthcare’s CJW Medical Center billed Medicare $117,477 and got about $12,926 from the government. Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center billed $55,327 and got $20,308. Bon Secours Memorial Hospital charged $53,195, and got $12,458.

Sound screwy? It is. For all the talk about a free-market system, setting health care prices is anything but.

Instead of open bidding, think of hospital officials meeting behind closed doors, strategizing how much to charge to get reimbursed. Medicare, which usually represents about half of a hospital’s revenues, sets a fixed rate for various procedures. But hospitals can’t by law offer a specific set of prices for just Medicare.

So they factor in other price variables such as what insurance companies might pay on a percentage basis. A big insurer may pay only 20 percent of charges or what they negotiate privately. That automatically jacks up the asking price. Another variable is getting financial aid to help pick up the bill for indigents.

Moreover, higher prices don’t necessarily mean better quality, says Michael Spine, senior vice president for business development at Bon Secours Health System.

What results is an incredibly skewed set of prices for essentially the same procedures. That’s the takeaway from a survey by the federal Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which shows what hospitals billed Medicare — and what Medicare paid — for procedures in 100 categories in 2011. The Obama administration released the survey to drum up support for the Affordable Health Care Act, which takes full effect next year.

A glance at the survey shows that CJW Medical Center was by far the priciest on some procedures, but also reimbursed the least.

Take kidney-tract infections, for example. CJW filed $30,552 while MCV asked for $19,819. Yet MCV got more. For some heart-failure cases, HCA billed $40,274 while St. Mary’s Hospital, owned by nonprofit Bon Secours, billed $18,460. And St. Mary’s was reimbursed more. Go figure.

Because insurance companies base policies around what Medicare is billed and will pay for, just about everyone’s affected. Those without insurance could be stuck with the entire bill, although they can receive treatment free or through discounts.

“Hospital charges vary because they reflect the individual hospital’s mission, the patient population it serves and the subsidies necessary to provide essential public services,” says Anne Buckley, a spokeswoman for VCU Medical Center.

Mark Foust, a spokesman for HCA, says a “patient’s medical coverage — rather than charges — is what primarily drives what he or she pays a hospital.”

HCA and VCU help poor patients with their bills through discount or charity programs. So does Bon Secours, says Spine, who adds that releasing the results of such surveys is an important step in moving from “legacy” pricing to something more transparent.

Next on Obama’s list: releasing surveys of physicians’ fees.

Monopoly Markets and Health Care Costs

Does Inova exercise monopoly pricing power in the Northern Virginia health market?

Does Inova exercise monopoly pricing power in the Northern Virginia health market?

by James A. Bacon

Hospitals justify mergers with other hospitals in the same healthcare market on the grounds that they eliminate redundancy and duplication, allowing them to pass along savings to consumers. Do the putative benefits actually occur? Or do hospitals simply use their larger market share to negotiate better deals with insurance companies and pocket the savings themselves?

A new study sheds some light on that debate. In “Mergers When Prices Are Negotiated: Evidence from the Hospital Industry,” economists Gautaum Gowrisankaran, Aviv Nevo and Robert Town utilize discharge data compiled by the Virginia Health Information Foundation to analyze the dynamics of the Northern Virginia healthcare marketplace. (None of the economists live in Virginia, incidentally.)  Among the conclusions:

  • If a proposed merger between Inova Health System and the Prince William Hospital had gone through in 2006, it would have resulted in average price increases across the system equivalent to a 3.1% increase over the Inova system or a 30.5% increase at just Prince William. That merger was blocked.
  • Breaking up the entire multi-hospital Inova System would lead to a 7% market-wide decline in prices.
  • Putting into force health care policies that require patients to pay 25% coinsurance rates, about 10 times higher than they do now, would result in 16% lower prices.

Very interesting findings. The obvious policy conclusion is that we should bust up health care systems and require patients to pay a higher share of their medical costs to make them more price sensitive. Unfortunately, it is impossible for an average Joe to understand, much less subject to critical evaluation, the methodology employed by the three economists. Really, could you possibly understand this?

equation

 

OK, OK, I believe you. Whatever you say!

With the caveat that I could have reached the same conclusion by shaking a juju stick over a spreadsheet and uttering magical incantations, I do believe this is a subject worth exploring. The degree of concentration in the hospital industry affects the pricing power of the players in that industry. Is there such a thing as too much pricing power? Too little pricing power? Could we get lower health care costs in Virginia by busting up monopolies like Inova, Sentara (Hampton Roads) and Carilion (Central Virginia)? Could we get lower costs if employees paid a higher share of their medical bills out of pocket?

Is anyone in Virginia even asking these questions?

Damned with Faint Praise: Virginia Ranks Tops in South for Bicycle Friendliness

colorado_bicyclesVirginia ranks 16th nationally in the just-published League of American Bicyclists’ “Bicycle Friendly States” ranking, and No. 1 in the South. The state of Washington took the top spot, with Colorado nailing down No. 2.

Colorado cycling has come on strong in recent years as the business community has mobilized around the goal of making the Centennial State the healthiest state in the country. Businesses understand the connection between a healthy population and a healthy workforce, and the link between a healthy workforce and lower medical insurance rates, lower rates of absenteeism and higher productivity. That cause has yet to go mainstream in Virginia, where business lobbies have expended their political capital in recent to increase taxes to pay for more transportation projects without insisting upon any more accountability or results in how that money is spent.

Virginia scored best for “policies and programs” (with a 4 out of 5) and worst in “infrastructure and funding” and “evaluation and planning.”  (See the Virginia state profile here.)

Among the ideas advanced to make Virginia more bicycle-friendly, the League suggested passing laws that protected cyclists on streets and roads, investing more money in bicycle infrastructure, and holding a state bicycle summit.

Bacon’s bottom line: Ranking first in the South ain’t much to be proud of folks. The leading states are lapping us. We can do better. Last time I checked, bicycle-friendly policies don’t violate property rights, they don’t undermine the Constitution and they don’t cost a lot of money. Why are putatively conservative Republicans so hostile? For the price of a single highway boondoggle (the $244 million Charlottesville Bypass, before cost overruns, for instance) we could make massive strides in building bicycle infrastructure throughout the state.
– JAB

First They Came for Our Tax-Subsidized Sodas, then They Came for our Tax-Subsidized Snack Foods

Graphic credit: The Onion (Click for more legible image)

by James A. Bacon

I had occasion the other day to visit an inner city convenience store in Richmond while working on an article I hope to post to the blog shortly.  I am not exactly Mr. Health Food Guy — I won’t touch tofu, cauliflower or fish oil — but even I was appalled by the wares on display.

Entire shelves in this shoebox establishment were given over to beer, soda, candy, pork rinds, potato chips and sugar-drenched cereals. The healthiest (or should I say “least unhealthy”) foods were ordinary starches like rice and potatoes whose sole nutritional virtue is that they were not drenched in sugar, fat and salt. If there is any correlation between the percentage of shelf space stocked with junk food and the nutritional intake of neighborhood residents, there should be no mystery whatsoever why Richmond’s inner-city population is suffering an epidemic of obesity, diabetes and hypertension.

I totally subscribe to the doctrine that people should be held accountable for their behavior. We should not make excuses for poor people who blow their slender resources on cigarettes, lottery tickets, a six-pack of beer and a bag of Tom’s Bacon Cheddar Fries. But I also acknowledge that the story is much bigger than the irresponsible lifestyle choices of the poor. Rent-seeking corporations and a spineless federal government bear their share of the blame.

Yesterday, Coca-Cola held its annual meeting. If all went according to schedule, David Almasi, executive director of the National Center for Public Policy Research, was planning to criticize the company for lobbying to keep soft drinks eligible for food stamps. Currently, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) forbids only the purchase of alcohol and tobacco. Through SNAP, American taxpayers subsidize the purchase of about $4 billion worth of soda products yearly.

My thinking on the subject coincides exactly with Almasi’s sentiments:

I’m all for freedom of choice and respecting peoples’ personal decisions, but Coke lobbying for its share of food stamp money is above and beyond altruism. While publicly promoting so-called ‘sustainability’ by hyping good nutrition and active lifestyles, Coca-Cola lobbyists are quietly seeking to ensure that American taxpayers subsidize the company’s high-calorie, sugary beverages. Both political parties carp about cutting the budget and fixing the deficit. How about stopping this virtual river of soda being paid for with our tax dollars?

I also agree with Justin Danhof, director of the National Center Free Enterprise Project:

In a free marketplace, folks should be able to purchase what they want. That is why Coca-Cola was right to fight New York City Mayor Michael Bloombeg’s efforts to ban large beverages, but wrong when it fought his efforts to limit SNAP funds to healthier items. SNAP does not operate in a free market. It is taken from folks’ paychecks. It is reasonable to limit how those benefits are administered and for what items.

Actually, I would go a step further. I would apply the same logic to snack foods as well. If hunger is still a problem in the inner city, as many say is the case, public funds should be limited to products that meet basic nutritional guidelines. Surely, this is an area where do-gooder liberals and skin-flint conservatives can join forces to create better public policy and improve the health of the poor.

Factoid of the Day: 100,000 Seriously Emotionally Disturbed Children in Virginia

by James A. Bacon

The term “serious emotional disturbance” (SED) refers to diagnosable mental health problems that disrupt a child’s ability to function socially, academically and emotionally. Virginia’s Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services estimates that between 85,000 and 104,000 Virginia children and adolescents have SED. Between 47,000 and 66,000 suffer extreme impairment.

(Source: “Collection of Evidence-based Practices for Children and Adolescents with Mental Health Treatment Needs,” a report of the Virginia Commission on Youth.)

Is the number of emotionally disturbed children increasing or decreasing? Based purely upon my personal experience, I would say that the number is increasing. We simply didn’t see the same kinds of emotional meltdowns when I was a youth a half century ago that seem so epidemic today — and we didn’t enjoy the “blessings” of Prozac, Zoloft and the rest of the anti-depression formulary that we do today.

But the historical record shows that emotional disorders have always afflicted people, although they may have taken a different form. I suspect that emotional fragility is a genetically influenced trait that arises in a predictable percentage of the population generation after generation, the difference being how each generation manifests the anxiety and how society classifies the behaviors.

I have in my library a book written by Edward Shorter, “From Paralysis to Fatigue: A History of Psychosomatic Illness in the Modern Era.” Shorter notes that there have always been people with emotional disorders. In the Middle Ages, their bizarre behaviors were interpreted as demon possession. By the early Victorian era, new intellectual fashions had brought new diagnoses and new kinds of behavior. Young women spent years on the couch, rendered paralyzed by “spinal irritation.” The 19th century also saw widespread motor hysteria, in which people (primarily young woman) thrashed about with their limbs. As medical paradigms changed, new behaviors arose, such as fainting spells.

After the age of Freud and the discovery of the subconscious, outward manifestations of emotional fragility turned inward. At the time of his writing in 1992, Shorter suggested that Americans had developed a proclivity to amplify and medicalize normal bodily signals of pain and fatigue. Thus, levels of pain that would be easily tolerated in a peasant society became a source of great emotional distress. Another manifestation of stress and anxiety that became socially sanctioned in modern society was chronic fatigue.

Writes Shorter, “If one interprets being sick as seeking care for an illness, the average person in our society today is ‘sick’ more than twice a year, as opposed to less than once a year on average in the 1920s. … Illness is now channeled to the doctor’s office, as people redefine themselves as patients.”

Shorter was writing two decades ago, before the widespread dispensation of pharmaceuticals to address depression. The word “depression” did not make an appearance in his book’s index. But as medical paradigms have evolved, so have patients’ response to the cues of their doctors and society at large. Thus, today’s  seeming epidemic of depression may be just the latest manifestation and classification of age-old emotional fragilities.

It is theoretically possible that we are seeing something entirely new. A plausible case can be made that widespread lead poisoning contributed to the spike, and subsequent decline, of violence seen in America’s inner cities. Perhaps the playing of computer games alters the wiring of young children’s brains in a way that affects their functioning.

But if Shorter is right — if Americans are now more prone to medicalize psychosomatic illness — that may explain a lot about the nation’s soaring health care costs. Emotional illnesses tend to be chronic; they cannot be “cured” with a single procedure, as, say, an appendectomy can cure a burst appendix. Patients wander from doctor to doctor seeking medical treatment for an underlying disorder that has no cure.

What’s the answer? I don’t know. I’m not even sure I know the question.

IG of the Day: Physical and Emotional Well Being

Graphic credit: Gallup-Healthways Well Being Index

Virginia scores 14th nationally in Gallup-Healthway’s 2012 Well Being Index, which incorporates the following metrics: life evaluation, emotional health, physical health, healthy behaviors, work environment and access to health care.

The Washington metro ranked tops in the country for large communities, and Charlottesville third for small communities. Richmond (No. 92), Lynchburg (No. 93) and Virginia Beach (No. 99) all ranked in the middle quintile for the 189 metropolitan areas surveyed.

View the Virginia state index here.

McAuliffe: Can a Schmoozer Transform?

By Peter Galuszka

On Easter Sunday, I was driving in a cold rain to Charlottesville for a family event. My cell phone started beeping with messages from Democratic gubernatorial hopeful Terry McAuliffe.

He said he was on his way to his own family brunch but wanted to tap me for $5. I got similar messages from two other staffers.

Why bother me at Easter? Political analyst Larry Sabato wondered the same thing. In a tweet that day he complained about finding “11 obnoxious messages for $$$. Now I know the answer to the age old Q; Is nothing sacred?”

And that may be McAuliffe’s biggest problem as he faces arch-conservative Ken Cuccinelli in the off-year governor’s race. In my profile of him in Style Weekly, I note that McAuliffe is trying to rein in an expansive personality that has made him a top political schmoozer and fundraiser for Democrats from Jimmy Carter to Bill and Hillary Clinton.

A decades’ long political operative who has never been in elected office, he can be bombastic and smooth, as his recent dealings with GreenTech Automotive shows. He flirted with Virginia for a hybrid  car plant before going to Mississippi. He has been accused of somehow using the car plant to win special visas for foreign workers and maybe misleading the Virginia Economic Development Partnership about his intentions in the Old Dominion.

Meanwhile, he must overcome some of his misunderstandings of traditional Virginia thinking. However, it’s probably a good thing that he’s going to skip the Shad Planking in Wakefield tonight with its Confederate flags where Cuccinelli will be keynote speaker.

While polls are about 50-50 in the race, McAuliffe’s fundraising prowess has shown brightly. In the first quarter, he raised more than $5 million — more than double the take of Cuccinelli, who has hamstrung by not being allowed raise money during the General Assembly session because of his position as Attorney General. Read on…

(Also, here as a Q&A with McAuliffe)

No Reform Three Years After Massey Disaster

 By Peter Galuszka

Three years ago today, a tremendous blast caused by bad safety conditions at Massey Energy’s Upper Big Branch mine in Montcoal, W.Va., killed 29 miners. It was the worst coal mine disaster in this country in 40 years.

But three years later, very little has been done to toughen mine safety regulations so that serial violators such as the now defunct, Richmond-based Massey can squeeze profits from miners’ lives and also, from the mountains they have destroyed through severe mountaintop removal mining methods.

J. Davitt McAteer, a former U.S. Labor official and mining expert, and Beth Spence, a coalfield specialist for the American Friends Service Committee, write of failures on the state and federal level to stem safety abuses in the Charleston Gazette.

The West Virginia legislature passed a reform law in 2012 but much of it hasn’t been implemented, including improved measures to spray rock dust to keep down the coal dust of the type that helped carry Upper Big Branch’s destructive blast through seven miles of underground seams with fatal results.

The U.S. Congress is even more laggard. It has considered several versions of a law first proposed after Upper Big Branch by the late Sen. Robert Byrd to punish repeat safety violators, protect whistle blowers and make top management accountable when they make decisions that put safety at risk. The Byrd bill, as it is known, has been nowhere ever since the Republican Party, riding the Tea Party wave, took control of the U.S. House of Representatives in 2010.

Other disturbing points include a new audit at the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration that it has implemented only about half of the internal changes recommended after the disaster. Also, legal teams at the Labor Department assembled to force mine operators to improve safety are being disbanded due to federal budget cuts. A favored Massey tactic was to mount legal challenges to most safety violations. The result was that important corrections were not made.

An even older problem seems unresolved. For years, miners were afflicted with pneumoconiosis, or black lung disease, a debilitating and often fatal illness that comes from breathing coal dust. For 24 of the miners whose bodies had enough lung tissue to sample at autopsy (the rest were too ripped apart by the blast) there was evidence of black lung even though some were only in their 20s.

True, the coalfields of Central Appalachia are in a slump now that natural gas has out-priced coal in the electric utility market. But the fields of Virginia, West Virginia and Kentucky still produce plenty of metallurgical coal that is typically exported to make steel in China, India and Brazil. That was the product produced by the dead Massey miners.

Meanwhile, miners continue to die. In the first quarter of this year, eight miners have died including five in West Virginia alone. “This compares with five during the same period of 2012, two in 2011 and two in 2010 (before Upper Big Branch),” write McAteer and Spence.

Mind you, this is more than a year after Bristol-based Alpha Natural Resources, which bought Massey in 2011, entered into an agreement with federal prosecutors as part of a Massey settlement to spend millions in mine safety training and improvement.

The Alpha deal, however, has no legal clout over the coal industry. It would take legislation for that.

Sadly, miners’ lives don’t seem important enough to merit new laws.