Category Archives: Agriculture & forestry

Tempe, Tofu, Bean Sprouts…. or Bacon.

Hmmm. Tofu... yum, yum, YUCK!

Hmmm. Tofu… yum, yum, YUCK!

Who would have figured? PETA has selected Richmond, Va., as the 10th most “vegan friendly” city in the United States, behind Boulder, Colo., Las Vegas (really?), Salt Lake City, Seattle, Chicago, New York, Los Angeles, Portland and, at the No. 1 spot, Austin.

Writes PETA :

It’s somewhat ironic that a city that’s historically been a focal point of the tobacco industry is increasingly being known for health-promoting vegan fare. Richmond, Virginia, is packed with meat-free restaurants, including Phoenix Garden, Rooster Cart, Harrison St. Cafe, Ipanema, and RVA Vegan, a compassionate bakery. Not to be missed are the curried “chicken” salad and fried artichoke hearts at 821 Cafe. For late-night eats, both vegans and meat-eaters will enjoy Strange Matter, a live-music venue that doubles as an arcade and features cruelty-free dishes with such names as The Revenge and Famous Uncle Paul’s Vegan Mango Donut Holes.

For more than a decade, vegetarians and vegans in the commonwealth have gathered each June for the Richmond Vegetarian Festival. Admission to the 2013 fest is free!

Bacon! Bacon, bacon, bacon. Bacon, bacon.Bacon, bacon, bacon!

Bacon! … Bacon, bacon! … (Pant! Drool.) … Bacon, bacon, bacon!

As for me, the Bacon family and I are heading down to Shockoe Bottom Sunday to partake in Richmond’s first Bacon Festival. States Richmond.com: “More than 20 Richmond restaurants, like On the ROX, Halligan’s, TJ’s and Naked Onion, will whip up “bacon-centric dishes” and Devils Backbone Brewery and Bold Rock Hard Cider will be pouring more than 20 craft beers.”

The real moral of the story: Richmond has a great food scene!

“You Want Maggots With That, Hon?”

Paula DeenBy Peter Galuszka

Free trade capitalists may cheer the proposed $4.7 billion takeover of Virginia icon Smithfield Foods by a Chinese firm, but there is plenty to give pause and the blowback is creating some strange bedfellows.

The major issues are whether one should want Chinese-style management in charge of American corporations given their record on safety and market ethics.

Even arch-conservative Del. Bob Marshall is sounding alarm bells. He wrote in letter to Smithfield’s brass that: “China’s widespread food safety problems are known to American consumers and will engulf Smithfield Foods regardless of the names under which they are sold.”

Among Marshall’s points is that Shuanghui International Holdings Inc., which wants Smithfield, has a record of unsafe practices in its current food operations. He cites press accounts that the firm bought pigs 2011 that contained clenbuterol that was banned in 2002 and that ribs the firm sold last year had maggots and sausage had too much bacteria.

The takeover, which still needs approval from U.S. regulators, took a hit when a few days after its announcement, at least 119 people were killed in a poultry slaughterhouse in Northern China. The Chinese media says that many workers had been locked in the factory, which is a common workplace practice in that country.

In the past two years, some 70,000 Chinese have lost their lives in industrial accidents – a record that make any reasonable person think twice.

To be sure, U.S. firms have had their troubles including some in Virginia. In 2008 and 2009, a salmonella outbreak that killed nine and sickened 666 was traced to filthy operations at a Georgia plant owned by Lynchburg-based Peanut Corporation of America. And, according to the Journal, U.S. firms operating in China may tend to adopt to local practices. In 2011, dust explosions killed four and injured 59 at factories owned by suppliers for Apple Inc.

Shuanhui officials say they want to “learn” about safer practices from Smithfield. And, there could be a case that Western involvement may help the Chinese modernize. Coal mine deaths in 2012 dropped to 1,384, a decrease of nearly 30 percent. Last year, 19 American coal miners died. Of course, China mines nearly three times the amount of coal as China does and a number of U.S. deep mines were slowed or shuttered by market conditions. Not that long ago, however, China was losing up to 5,000 miners every year.

The problem with the Smithfield takeover – if the Chinese executives are to be believed – is that it puts the cart before the horse. If the Chinese own Smithfield their practices and cultural will prevail, no matter how bright a picture they want to paint.

That is something the free traders might want to think about before they follow a Paula Deen recipe calling for Smithfield brand sausage or bacon.

Holy Pig Slop! Chinese to Buy Smithfield

hog farmBy Peter Galuszka

For eons, the name “Smithfield” has conjured up rich, salty Virginia ham slices that fit right on Christmas rolls or in crab dishes and with eggs for breakfast. The company that has produced such food for 80 or so years is based (of course) in Smithfield, a quaint Tidewater town the Pagan River just off the James.

But as the food industry has become ultra-mechanized, so has Smithfield Foods’ problems. Back in the 1990s, it was fined $12.6 million for letting hog waste flow into the Pagan River. It later agreed to pay North Carolina $50 million over 25 years for problems at its Tar Heel, N.C. mega-plant.

Although Smithfield has cleaned up its act, or so we’re told, there is unsettling news that the firm will be bought for $4.7 billion by China’s Shuanghui International. If approved, the buyout will not result in moving the corporate HQ out of Smithfield or any firings, but that’s today’s news. As China’s middle class evolves, it tends to like pork products, and the demand to import ham and sausage is strong.

The worry is that you are selling off a major American food producer that has had serious health, environment and labor issues to a firm in China, a country that is notorious for its neglect of all of the above. Shanghai’s drinking water system was threatened a few months ago because the Whampoa River was crammed with diseased hog bodies. Standards are so low that the U.S. won’t let beef be exported, although we get a lot of our Tilapia from China.

The buyout would be the most significant yet for cash-flush Chinese firms and draws similarities to the massive buys Japanese firms made back in the 1980s.

Strict business types might still sound the usual upbeat mantra that China’s a huge market  and yada, yada, yada, but I’ve been hearing that refrain since the days of Denh Xioaping. For realists, the bloom has been off as more evidence comes forward of cyber snooping, lax product safety standards and the utterly venal corruption of Communist Party hacks who still run the show.

Add to the this the idea that you may have gigantic American hog farms in the Southeast or Midwest churning out porkers for the Chinese and one wonders if the corrections taken for safety will remain in place. The hog farm concept sprang onto the scene in the 1990s when firms like Smithfield learned they could mass grow hogs in oppressively crowded conditions and dump their considerable fecal matter into huge ponds whose dams are prone to breaching.

The Raleigh News & Observer won a Pulitzer in the 1990s for alerting the country of what was going on.

Putting a known polluter under Chinese ownership does not sound like a great idea.

A ball cap for Cooch

CoochCapUpdate.  In a recent post I recommended that Ken Cuccinelli wear a hat when attempting to imitate a farmer.  I suggested the always popular “Bass Pro Shops” brim.  However, I have been advised of a better option which is pictured here.

Hat Tip: LarryG

- D.J. Rippert

Cuccinelli channels his inner Greenjeans

Ken the farmerFaceplant.  Every morning I open my Facebook page to see what my “friends” are doing.  Some are ranting about Obama, some are still ranting about Bush, several want people to adopt dogs of various breeds.  Bacon is plugging his latest column and quite a few people are looking for things in a game called Farmville.  This morning was a bit different.  Staring back at me from my computer monitor was Ken “Mr Greenjeans” Cuccinelli.  The Cooch has decided to solicit support for his jobs plan by being photographed in a field, wearing jeans and leaning against the back of a pickup truck.  I actually did laugh out loud when I saw the picture.

Paging Michael Dukakis.  I have nothing but respect for farmers or ranchers or cowboys (except the ones from Dallas) or whoever Cuccinelli was trying to impress.  I even own a place in rural Maryland surrounded by corn and soybean fields.  There are plenty of real farmers out there so I’m pretty sure I could recognize a farmer if I saw one.  Cooch … dude – you look like a Swedish accountant who hasn’t been outdoors since the late 90s.  Jim Bacon looks more like a farmer than you do.

Pointers for the next farming photo op.  Here’s the difference between what I have observed of actual farmers and your photograph.  Farmers don’t wear golf shirts.  Put on a tee shirt.  If you don’t own one find a skinny 14 year old and see if he’ll lend you his.  There is no Earthly way that farmers can keep their skin as white as yours.  Maybe hit a tanning bed or at least try some insta-tan.  A hat would also be nice.  I’d recommend “Bass Pro Shops” but anything other than a hat made by a golf equipment manufacturer will work.  No flat brims and take the store tag off before wearing it.  We’ll work on the urban look later, for now it’s the rural thing we’re trying to get right.

The real Farmer Greenjeans.  Ken, there is hope – the actor who portrayed Farmer Greenjeans on Captain Kangaroo wasn’t a real farmer either.  His name was Hugh Brannum and he grew up in the suburbs of Chicago and became a jazz musician before he took on the persona of Farmer Greenjeans.

Equal time.  Anybody who knows of a picture of Terry McAuliffe pretending to be something he is not should bring it to my attention.  For example, a picture of Terry pretending to be a person interested in public service would work.

- D.J. Rippert

Chowing on Chickpeas

Sabra hummus. Yummmm.

There sits in my refrigerator a near-empty container of Sabra red-pepper hummus. The Bacon family generally avoids pre-meal snacks and hors d’oeuvres, but when we do indulge, we put hummus on our crackers, not the usual cream cheese-based dips. Hummus, which uses chick peaks as the main ingredient, is high in protein. Not only does it have less fat than cream cheese, it’s the good kind of fat.

I wouldn’t go so far as to say that hummus hors d’oeuvres are healthy — you have to consider the salt, sugar and fat loaded into the crackers. But it’s definitely less unhealthy than cheese dip. And it tastes just as good. Maybe better. (Lots of garlic. Mmmm.)

That’s a round-about preamble to the news story of the day, the announcement by Sabra Dipping Co. that it will invest $86 million to double the size of its Chesterfield County manufacturing facility. Sabra will ramp up production of its hummus spread from 6,000 tons per month to 10,000 tons, reports the Richmond Times-Dispatch. The company also has just opened an 18,000-square-foot R&D facility on the property.

What’s more, Sabra is launching a major initiative to grow chickpeas in Virginia as a way to diversify the source of its chickpea supply in the event of crop failures in Washington state and Idaho. Sourcing chickpeas also would lower the trans-continental shipping costs, writes the Wall Street Journal. Right now, the chickpea crop is valued at a modest $115 million a year. But that number is bound to grow as hummus continues to gain in popularity and Americans develop export markets.

Virginia offers a longer growing season for chickpeas but the summer heat and humidity makes plants vulnerable to the Ascochyta fungus blight. Sabra is sponsoring research at Virginia State University, which is trying to identify a chickpea variety suited to the climate. Virginia farmers could be growing the crop on a commercial scale within three years.

Richmonders, it’s time to embrace not only Sabra as a good corporate citizen but to start chowing down its chickpeas! Not only is hummus a healthier alternative to fat- and calorie-drenched cheese-based dips and spreads, it’s locally processed and soon will be locally grown. What’s not to love?

– JAB

From Tiny Seeds, Mighty Collard Greens Grow

Saleh Murshed, whose family runs the Clay Street Market, stocks the shop’s new refrigerator with fresh greens.

 by James A. Bacon

To grasp the challenge that faces the reformers who want to introduce wholesome fruits and vegetables into the food desert of Richmond’s inner city, go visit the Clay Street Market in Church Hill. Step through the front door and glance around. To the left, you’ll see Shawn Algahein or one of his relatives behind the cash register ringing up sales of cigarettes, lottery tickets, food and other convenience items. Sweeping your gaze to the right, you’ll view shelf after shelf of food so unhealthy that just looking at it hardens the arteries. Near the door is an array of candy: Twix, Skittles, Hershey chocolate bars and dozens of other brands. Nearby, racks groan under six-packs of Miller beer and big plastic bottles of Coca-Cola. Counters display an endless assortment of snack foods: Dorito’s, Lays Potato Chips and varieties of pork rinds you’ll never find in a suburban store. Toward the rear, you’ll spot shelf space devoted to real if not especially nutritious food, like rice, potatoes, ketchup, canned peas and and canned spaghetti.

Amidst the cornucopia of salt, sugar and fat, set just behind a case loaded with ice cream bars, stands a small refrigerator, a little bigger than one you might find in a college dorm room. Through the glass case you can see a dozen or so bundles of locally grown collard greens and salad greens.

Sales of fresh vegetables are a little slow, says Algahein. He hopes they will pick up in the beginning of the month when many of his customers get their food stamps. “When people see [the fresh food], they say it’s good we have it,” he says. “People are excited that we have it.”

In the past when he tried fresh fruit and vegetables, he lost money. He stocked green peppers, bananas, apples and oranges, he says, but “we threw a lot of stuff away.” Eventually, he gave up. But this time is different. He is taking no financial risk. Tricycle Gardens, a non-profit urban farm, provided the refrigerator at no expense, and it promises to reimburse Alghahein for any produce that goes bad. Give it time, he says, and the vegetables could catch on. “People are looking for stuff that is healthier.”

The Clay Street Market is one of two convenience stores — a Valero market in the Fulton area is the other — participating in a pilot project that Tricycle Gardens and its partners launched this month. The short-term goal is to sell enough fresh fruit and veggies to justify taking up permanent shelf space in the two convenience stores. A longer-term goal is to replicate the project elsewhere. The ultimate goal is to obliterate food deserts, where fresh food is inaccessible to anyone without a car, across the commonwealth.

Sally Schwitters, executive director of Tricycle Gardens, is under no illusions that the task will be easy but she is optimistic. The launch has met expectations. “Within the first week,” she says, “we sold out of collard greens.”

The Healthy Corners initiative arose from conversations involving Tricycle Gardens, the City of Richmond, the state health department, Virginia Community Capital and the Bon Secours of Richmond Health System. City Councilwoman Cynthia Newbill chaired a series of meetings beginning in December 2012. All parties shared a concern that poor nutrition was a root cause of obesity, diabetes, hypertension and other maladies afflicting the poor.

“Everyone saw the need and said, ‘Yes, let’s do this,” recalls Teri Lovelace, vice president-corporate development for Virginia Community Capital, a community development financial institution. What she found remarkable, she adds, is the speed with which things came together. People started talking in December and food was placed in two markets by April.

Inspired by the experience of Philadelphia and Washington, D.C., in distributing fresh food through inner-city grocery stores, the Richmond participants put their own spin on the idea. For starters, they had less money so they decided to start with a pilot project rather than a city-wide roll-out. On the other hand, Tricycle Gardens already had built a strong network of relationships in the East End, so it held a series of community meetings to test the waters. Read more.

Smart Tree Huggery vs. Impatient Tree Huggery

Everybody loves trees, right? I mean everybody. It just makes so much sense. Trees are aesthetically pleasing. They provide shade and their respiration helps cool their surroundings. They reduce storm water runoff, filter air pollution and provide habitat for wildlife. Indeed, some writers suggest that humans are hard-wired for “biophilia,” a concept that encompasses the love of trees. As Adam Winston sums up that theory (which he does not entirely agree with):

Psycho-evolutionary theory is based on the notion that millions of years of evolution have left modern humans with a partly genetic predisposition to respond positively to nature and prefer landscapes that favor their own survival. …

Humans have evolved in a largely unmodified natural environment, with only a tiny fraction of our evolutionary history having been spent in artificially constructed urban environments. Because of this, it is suggested, our physical and mental well being is still highly dependent on contact with the natural environment, and this is why trees and forests in and around urban places can provide places that improve our mental and physical health.

There are many tree lovers in the Richmond region, and for the most part I count myself among them (although I do confess to a hatred of a particular tree in my back yard that spews gumballs by the thousands).

But the love of trees is not universal, as the Washington Post points out in an article about the travails of environmentalists trying to plant trees in less affluent sections of Washington, D.C. An article this morning quotes a certain Doris Gudger, who was less than gratified when a city crew started planting trees in front of her rowhouse in Southeast D.C. The pollen would aggravate her allergies, she said. Raking leaves would be a pain. Drug dealers would use the trees for shade. Gentrifiers were sure to follow, raising property values, and she would have to pay higher taxes.

Casey Trees, a D.C.-based organization that has provided guidance to the urban-canopy movement in Richmond, has learned that it does no good to plant trees if there is no community support for them. No one waters them, and they wither and die. Now the group plants trees only when a homeowner association or community group asks for health.

But even that can be an obstacle. People in lower-income neighborhoods often perceive young environmentalists as outsiders — the latest in a parade of do-gooders who parachute in, indulge their latest enthusiasm, and then depart. The same probably can be said of other causes peddled by the affluent, white ministering class in poor neighborhoods for such causes as urban gardening and wholesome foods (causes, incidentally, that I support).

Bottom line: The altruistically inclined should never assume that people they aim to help actually want that help. They may have very different priorities and may look at the world in very different ways. Outsiders must invest the time to network with the people whose lives they seek to better, build relationships of trust and gain their buy-in. Such foundation-building efforts will be richly rewarded.

– JAB

First They Came for Our Tax-Subsidized Sodas, then They Came for our Tax-Subsidized Snack Foods

Graphic credit: The Onion (Click for more legible image)

by James A. Bacon

I had occasion the other day to visit an inner city convenience store in Richmond while working on an article I hope to post to the blog shortly.  I am not exactly Mr. Health Food Guy — I won’t touch tofu, cauliflower or fish oil — but even I was appalled by the wares on display.

Entire shelves in this shoebox establishment were given over to beer, soda, candy, pork rinds, potato chips and sugar-drenched cereals. The healthiest (or should I say “least unhealthy”) foods were ordinary starches like rice and potatoes whose sole nutritional virtue is that they were not drenched in sugar, fat and salt. If there is any correlation between the percentage of shelf space stocked with junk food and the nutritional intake of neighborhood residents, there should be no mystery whatsoever why Richmond’s inner-city population is suffering an epidemic of obesity, diabetes and hypertension.

I totally subscribe to the doctrine that people should be held accountable for their behavior. We should not make excuses for poor people who blow their slender resources on cigarettes, lottery tickets, a six-pack of beer and a bag of Tom’s Bacon Cheddar Fries. But I also acknowledge that the story is much bigger than the irresponsible lifestyle choices of the poor. Rent-seeking corporations and a spineless federal government bear their share of the blame.

Yesterday, Coca-Cola held its annual meeting. If all went according to schedule, David Almasi, executive director of the National Center for Public Policy Research, was planning to criticize the company for lobbying to keep soft drinks eligible for food stamps. Currently, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) forbids only the purchase of alcohol and tobacco. Through SNAP, American taxpayers subsidize the purchase of about $4 billion worth of soda products yearly.

My thinking on the subject coincides exactly with Almasi’s sentiments:

I’m all for freedom of choice and respecting peoples’ personal decisions, but Coke lobbying for its share of food stamp money is above and beyond altruism. While publicly promoting so-called ‘sustainability’ by hyping good nutrition and active lifestyles, Coca-Cola lobbyists are quietly seeking to ensure that American taxpayers subsidize the company’s high-calorie, sugary beverages. Both political parties carp about cutting the budget and fixing the deficit. How about stopping this virtual river of soda being paid for with our tax dollars?

I also agree with Justin Danhof, director of the National Center Free Enterprise Project:

In a free marketplace, folks should be able to purchase what they want. That is why Coca-Cola was right to fight New York City Mayor Michael Bloombeg’s efforts to ban large beverages, but wrong when it fought his efforts to limit SNAP funds to healthier items. SNAP does not operate in a free market. It is taken from folks’ paychecks. It is reasonable to limit how those benefits are administered and for what items.

Actually, I would go a step further. I would apply the same logic to snack foods as well. If hunger is still a problem in the inner city, as many say is the case, public funds should be limited to products that meet basic nutritional guidelines. Surely, this is an area where do-gooder liberals and skin-flint conservatives can join forces to create better public policy and improve the health of the poor.

Hens and Self Sufficiency

Sheena and Valerie, activists with the Chickunz urban-chicken movement. Photo credit: Chickunz RVa Facebook page.

In a victory for urban chicken lovers everywhere, Richmond City Council adopted yesterday the final set of regulations that will make it permissible to own up to four hens in residential areas. In a setback for gender equality, however, the ban on roosters still applies. (See the Times-Dispatch article.)

Just kidding about the gender-equality thing. Roosters are a nuisance. Nobody wants to be woken at daybreak by a cock crowing next door. In all seriousness, lifting the ban on urban chickens marks a big step forward for the locally grown food movement, which is gaining momentum across Virginia.

There are a couple of layers to the issue worth examining. The first is the matter of individual rights. Why shouldn’t people be allowed to raise chickens in their back yards if it doesn’t pose a nuisance or health hazard to neighbors? What business is it of local government to restrict the practice? The City of Richmond will charge a $60-a-year permit to offset the cost of subjecting chicken coop owners to inspections by the Department of Animal Control and Care. That’s a reasonable concession to ensure that sanitary conditions are maintained.

The second issue is aiding and expediting the growth of the locally grown food movement. If Virginians increasingly have a taste for chicken and/or eggs that aren’t raised under the conditions of industrial agriculture, with all the hormones that are fed to the chickens and all the chicken waste that is produced, then public policy should encourage them to raise their own hens.

Furthermore, in a time of chronic economic hardship, when thousands of Virginians are short on cash and long on spare time, food self-sufficiency strikes me as a good thing. Poor people, in particular, should be coaxed into supplementing their food stamps with eggs, chicken and garden produce they raise themselves. We all know the old saying, “Give a man a fish and feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and feed him for a lifetime.” Substitute “chicken” for “fish.” Self-sufficiency — now, that’s real social change!

– JAB