The Jefferson Journal

Michael W. Thompson



Keep 'em in the Dark

 

Virginia's budget is incomprehensible to citizens. Legislators refuse to revamp the document so the public can understand it, and Gov. Warner has yet to produce the overhaul he promised.


 

The General Assembly finally wound up its business and went home a couple of weeks ago. This year’s session was a spend-fest compared to last year’s tax-fest.

 

Thanks to an expanding economy, our state’s Treasury is overflowing with “extra” money. When Gov. Mark R. Warner presented his budget amendments in December, a surplus of around $918 million was projected in the current two-year budget. By the time the General Assembly got down to drafting a “revised and updated” budget, that surplus had grown to more than $1.2 billion. And it is projected that the surplus could balloon to over $2 billion by the end of this budget cycle in June 2006.

 

After ending the state’s portion of the food tax a year early, more than $800 million went to transportation and additional funds were spent on state employee salary increases, teacher increases, health care spending and on and on.

 

But the spenders didn’t manage to put a relatively small amount of money into the re-crafting of the state budget so that our senators and delegates could better understand where and how well our money is being spent -- even though some of our top budget leaders admit that the current budget document is complicated, obtrusive and not a good management tool.

 

Most states have budgets that are easy to understand. Virginia does not. Check it out for yourself. Do you understand it? Try to figure out how our money is being spent in any real detail. You can’t. 

 

Two years ago the General Assembly overwhelmingly passed a resolution demanding a state budget that could be understood.

 

Last year the House “held over” specific legislation to this year that would have required a new budget document. And then, last April, Gov. Warner signed an Executive Order to bring a working group together to craft a more user-friendly budget.

 

But the House allowed this important bill to die by not bringing it back this year. There was no effort made to amend any relevant bill with this needed budget reform. And Gov. Warner has never convened his “working group.”

 

So our elected leaders remain in the dark on how our taxes are being spent compared to their colleagues in most other states. And the public is in the dark as well.

 

Some key leaders claimed this year that “we can’t afford the price tag” for re-designing the state budget. That’s just plane nonsense.

 

Let’s look at the facts: The initial cost for budget redesign was estimated at $5 million (although many budget experts doubt that figure). The annual cost beyond that was about $400,000 a year, in exchange for which legislators, business leaders, the press corps, and other interested people would have access to a budget that could be understood.

 

Even if the $5 million price tag were accurate for designing the new budget document, it would have only been four tenths of one percent of the total surplus that the General Assembly spent this year. Yet, legislators seem content in running the state in the dark without the needed management tool that any private sector Board of Directors would demand.

 

So now the question is this: Will Gov. Warner come up with a newly designed and more easily understood budget document on his own? The Executive Order he signed a year ago shows his interest in moving in this direction.

 

And rumors around Richmond are that a new budget design is “in the works.” But so far, if a new budget is being designed, it is under wraps and we don’t know if it will really present a more transparent state budget giving a more accountable and verifiable approach to current government spending.

 

One of the biggest legacies this governor can leave to the citizens of Virginia is a budget document that clearly details how our tax money is spent, how well state programs are functioning and what the real costs are for providing various services, and that shows a two- or three-year overview of how agencies have spent our money.

 

If Gov. Warner completes his term by presenting a true “Citizens Budget” similar to what states such as California, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina and Florida have crafted, then he will be leaving a legacy that allows legislators, business leaders, community activists, reporters and others to better understand how our money is being spent.

 

If Gov. Warner does this, he will have begun a process that could indeed bring state spending under control.

 

-- March 14, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Michael Thompson is chairman and president of the Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy, a non-partisan foundation seeking better alternatives to current government programs and policies. These are his opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Institute or its Board of Directors.  Mr. Thompson can be reached here.