Virginia Pundit Watch

Will Vehrs



Desperately Seeking an Angle

 

On the eve of the convening of another General Assembly, our Virginia pundits struggled to find a fresh angle, or least an angle that hasn’t been used since the last session. There was déjà vu, nostalgia, what to watch, and, of course, “tough choices.” The Daily Press pundit team of Hugh Lessig and Terry Scanlon

had the only angle based on fear, suggesting that the General Assembly might last beyond 60 days.

 

Margaret Edds of the Virginian-Pilot used the déjà vu meme, although her column might have been titled, “Been there, they haven’t done that.” With a hint of ennui, she noted, “In Richmond, what goes around comes around ... and around ... and around.” She listed 10 issues that have seemingly been around forever without resolution, including tax reform and guns in bars: “Before today’s toddlers grow up, marry, have their own children, and get elected to the legislature, it would be nice to have several of these issues resolved.”

 

We’d never forget old what’s his/her name, if not for Jeff Schapiro of the Richmond Times-Dispatch reminding us of the faces who will be missing from this year’s gathering. Virginia will have to soldier on without ascerbic Sen. Leslie Byrne, D-Fairfax, and Del. “Tommy, we hardly knew ye” Bolvin, R-Fairfax. 

 

Most creative use of well-worn angle came from A. Barton Hinkle of the Times-Dispatch. Hinkle translated buzzwords:

 

"Unmet needs" and "structural imbalance" are so much ambasterous ruptumacy. (It doesn't take a creodontician to mortificate diaglutinative beciforms that sound impressive but don't mean jacandence.)

 

He also offered advice to Assembly watchers:

 

Keep the big picture in mind, especially when various special interests begin urging legislators not to "single out" their pet cause or "balance the budget on the backs of" one particular group. When multiple voices complain of being singled out, it seems fair to conclude none of them is.

 

Although he didn’t cover it, Hinkle might have cautioned against the angle of the Staunton News-Leader’s Nelson Graves. Does the Assembly face tough choices? Yes, but as Margaret Edds pointed out, they can be put off for a long, long time.

 

Once the session started, pundits returned to more “nuts and bolts” analysis. The politics of Wall Street and its possible effect on Virginia’s Aaa bond rating led Schapiro to sketch a “doomsday” scenario of the state ending up without a budget and possibly shutting the government down. Edds looked at divisions in the business community over Gov. Warner’s tax plan and asked, “What’s the pro-business position?” A bellwether will come from the Virginia Chamber of Commerce’s Board of Director’s meeting this week.

 

Tax Wars

 

The op-ed pages and other outlets were thick with competing commentaries on Gov. Warner’s tax plan and the more ambitious plan offered by Sen. John Chichester, R-Stafford. Much of the bloviation was shrill. Big-time Northern Virginia lobbyist John T. “Til” Hazel trashed both Republicans and Gov. Warner in a Washington Post piece, although he wrote before Chichester ’s plan was announced. “Deny and pretend are the hallmarks of Virginia's government today,” he concluded.

 

Club for Growth leaders Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara, writing in the Washington Times, threatened Republican legislators who might vote for the Warner or Chichester plans. Del. Kirk Cox, R-Colonial Heights, was scathing in the Richmond Times-Dispatch, saying, "The Governor has offered an Alice-in-Wonderland rationale that insults the people's intelligence.”   Blogger Ben Domenech simply called Governor Warner a “liar.”

 

On the pro-tax side, Steven Pearlstein of the Washington Post called Chichester a “hero” and the Republican analysis of Warner’s plan “junk science.”  Pearlstein’s colleague at the Post, Marc Fisher, made Gov. Warner and Senator Chichester his “Yay of the Day” for having “Woken up and realized that it is not possible to pretend forever that cutting taxes and increasing spending are comfy bedmates.” He liked the Warner plan because it is “A real stab at reforming the tax code to put more of the burden on the wealthy, to move toward the good and righteous policy of taxing the hell out of tobacco, and to create a more realistic approach to state finances.”

 

Dependable pro-tax pundit Gordon Morse used his Daily Press column to blast “free lunch populists” for causing “venerated” Virginia universities to move toward privatization. In the Washington Post, Morse called Chichester’s plan “A well-thought-out proposal that will be fiercely resisted.” He rightly points to an Achilles heel: 

 

Ask your average hard-core tax-cutter about specific spending cuts and you get a blank stare and a trembling lower lip. That is particularly so in Virginia because the drivers of state spending growth -- nursing home care (via Medicaid), property tax relief and public education -- do not lend themselves to easy, risk-free slashing.

 

Your State Employees at Work

 

University presidents and state employees Alan Merten of George Mason and Paul Trible of Christopher Newport had op-eds in the Times-Dispatch and the Daily Press, respectively, calling for more state funding in higher education. According to Merten, “The Governor has put forward a reasonable proposal. His cards are on the table. It's time for the other players to call or fold.” Trible, chairman of the newly formed Foundation for Virginia, an organization lobbying for more funding, claimed, “We are not committed to any partisan agenda.”

 

Economic Development — Who Knew? 

 

Those who work in economic development rarely find their work discussed beyond vague platitudes. It was refreshing, therefore, to see Del. Preston Bryant, (R, Lynchburg), use his Roanoke Times column to relate economic development to the overall tax and budget debate, plus talk knowledgeably about individual programs and agencies. Bryant noted the slashed budgets of the Governor’s Opportunity Fund (42 percent), the Department of Business Assistance (43 percent), and the Virginia Tourism Authority (42 percent) since 2001. Although he didn’t address the possibility that some of the cuts might have been warranted — if Governor’s Opportunity Fund dollars were pared from companies that might cut and run, like John Deere did in James City County, for example — Bryant raised a good point for those who would “grow” Virginia’s way out of budget difficulties: 

 

This is not to say that if we simply invest in a few economic development initiatives all our ills will be cured and we can chuck tax reform. No, that’s not the case.

 

But it is to say that economic development is at the heart of the debate going on over the strength of Virginia’s recovery and how far it’ll take us. There should be a certain recognition that the benefits derived from such things as the GOF, business assistance programs, and top-notch tourism marketing just may be that extra bit of oomph needed to push Virginia’s economy beyond heights it otherwise might achieve by default.

 

The Marshall Conundrum

 

Bob Gibson of the Daily Progress obsessively follows the work of conservative social activist Del. Bob Marshall, R-Manassas. This week, Gibson said of Marshall, “His efforts to enshrine his Roman Catholic beliefs about sex and marriage are becoming more and more the talk of the House.” Surprisingly, though, as reported by Lessig and Scanlon of the Daily Press, Marshall opposed a measure allowing House of Delegates sessions to be televised. Marshall asked the bill’s sponsor, "Do you really want to give someone like me even more media exposure?"

You Can’t Have Mail

 

The most interesting non-General Assembly commentary of the week came from Becky Dale in the Times-Dispatch. Dale, a participant in Freedom of Information Advisory Council workgroups, previewed a Virginia Supreme Court case that will determine if e-mails between local elected officials constitute an illegal meeting forbidden under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act. She asks, “If our representatives cannot communicate with each other except at scheduled meetings, wouldn't such restrictions impair their First Amendment rights?”

 

My Legislation is Critical, but Yours ….

 

Taking up a perennial General Assembly theme, Denise Oppenhagen of the Potomac News decried the “Many bills proposed for inconsequential things,” such as special license plates and naming a historic oyster fleet. Apparently, “inconsequential” is in the eye of the beholder. Bob Gibson spent an entire Daily Progress column celebrating a proposed resolution from Del. Mitchell Van Yahres, D-Charlottesville, commemorating the notorious UVA Pep Band on its 30 year anniversary.

 

-- January 19, 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Will Vehrs grew up in Prince William County. He has a degree in American history from the College of William and Mary and an MBA from Chapman University. Will's experience includes a stint with a Fortune 500 company and economic development work in state government. His "Punditwatch" column appears on FoxNews.com and Jewish World Review, as well as on his own Punditwatch website. He also writes for the Quasipundit political site.