|
The
Creature from Stumpy Lake
The
$2.5 billion Southeast Parkway will provide a
short-cut to the Virginia Beach oceanfront.
Critics say the mega-project will needlessly open
up fragile wetlands to development.
by
Peter Galuszka
Stumpy
Lake marks a transitional zone in Hampton
Roads. To the north lies
the scattered, low-density subdivisions and
shopping centers that make up much of Virginia
Beach. To the south, across the line in Chesapeake, the scene is much more rural with
farms, small ranch-style houses and wetlands. The lake
itself is fringed by gnarled
cypress trees. Snowy-white egrets keep watch over dark, tannic waters.
The tranquility
of the man-made lagoon will change forever,
however, with the construction of the $2.5 billion,
21-mile-long Southeastern parkway, which will skim past
its southern shore. An interchange a few miles
away at Indian River
Road in Virginia Beach will replace winding
country roads with gas stations and strip malls.
Southeastern
Parkway, on the planning books since 1986, has
been given priority status by the General Assembly
along with a source of funds. The project will likely finish its federal review this fall. The
next step will be for the newly formed Hampton
Roads Transportation Authority (HRTA) to press on
with funding and construction planning.
Proponents
argue that the Parkway will ease traffic
congestion in south Hampton Roads by offering an
alternate route to Virginia Beach’s oceanfront.
It would avoid much of the perpetually crowded
Interstate 64, which involves crossing Hampton
Roads at two bottlenecked tunnels. Opponents
retort that the real purpose of the highway is to
open large swaths of farmland to development. It
will do little to mitigate congestion, they say, while
destroying scores of acres of sensitive wetlands.
“Studies
show that during high traffic, the old way to the
beachfront on Interstate 264 from I-64 is 57.4
minutes. On the Southeastern Parkway during the
same times, it will be 50.8 minutes,” says Skip
Stiles with Wetlands Watch, and environmental
group. “So, you’re going to spend billions on
this road to gain about seven minutes.”
The
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Fish
& Wildlife Service have voiced similar doubts
in their comments for a Draft Environmental Impact
Statement. Without big changes, a Corps expert
said, “We will continue to have skepticism to
the benefits of this project when compared to the
significant impact it has on natural resources and
the environment.”
Increasingly, the Parkway
looks like a done deal. The Cities of Virginia
Beach and Chesapeake have given their approvals,
albeit with some reluctance in Chesapeake’s
case. The Commonwealth Transportation Board okayed
the project in 2005. And the newly created Hampton Roads Transportation Authority
has been given revenue sources to pay for
construction.
The HRTA will
likely negotiate with a private entity to build,
operate and maintain the road. The authority still
has to work out toll
schedules and figure out how much money from the
$168 million in new fees and taxes will go into the project.
As part of the EIS process, some 150
acres of new wetlands will have to be secured to
make up for the acres of wetlands that the project
will destroy. The authority will have to negotiate
land purchases or easements for the wetlands. In
addition, according to the Virginian-Pilot,
it will have to help work out relocating
157 families, 14 businesses, five churches and
three cemeteries.
That’s
a tall order, and the HRTA can’t begin yet to take
on the load. The authority can’t even actively search for an executive
director yet. That post is being filled
temporarily by the executive director of the
Hampton Roads Planning District Commission. As of
the moment, the authority will not assess fees
until next April.
Delays
could boost the cost of the
project, which is estimated by VDOT to run between
$2.3 and $2.7 billion. However,
VDOT officials say there are ample safeguards
built into the estimate. According to Loretta
Markham, a location studies project manager at
VDOT, these dollar amounts are figured in 2014
dollars, the date that is expected to be the mid-point for
the project’s construction. Additionally, VDOT
has built in a buffer to cover a 25- to 50-percent
cost overrun.
Virginia
Beach officials shrug aside environmentalists’ complaints that
the project isn’t needed, will spur development
of traditionally rural areas and destroy sensitive
habitat. Says Virginia Beach Vice Mayor and
HRTA member Lois R. Jones: "My job is to make sure that Virginia Beach continues
to be a priority in the first group of
projects.”
Other
projects considered priorities by the General
Assembly include a third crossing over Hampton
Roads near Craney Island, a new Midtown tunnel in
Norfolk, an extension of the Martin Luther King
Freeway, and widening Interstate 664 in Newport
News and its bridge tunnel to six lanes. A new
superhighway to replace U.S. 460 from Petersburg
to Suffolk is also on the list.
The
U.S. 460 project is considered by some planners to tie
in closely with the Southeastern Parkway. Building
a new superhighway paralleling the existing U.S.
460 south of the James River, some say, will
offer beachgoers a speedy alternate to I-64 north
of the James, which
is often packed with stopped cars during vacation
season. The new road would link with I-64 in
Suffolk and then travelers could use the
Southeastern Expressway at an interchange near
Dominion Boulevard in Chesapeake to go to the
beachfront.
The
new road near U.S. 460 raises its share of
questions as well. Its cost estimates range from
$1 billion to $2 billion. Critics question whether
such a massive investment will do much to
alleviate traffic at current chokepoints. Private consortiums led by foreign companies are
pushing proposals. One proposal by a Swedish and
Australian group would build the 55-mile-long
project for up to $1.91 billion with no public
money. Separate proposals from two Spanish-led
consortiums offer dollar estimates of from $1.05
billion to $1.9 billion, albeit with hundreds of
millions in public money.
Top
state transportation officials have made it plain
that the state has no funds for the U.S. 460
corridor project and that any money has to come
from the HRTA or from tolls, whose estimates run
as high as $13 per car.
Environmental
groups, such as the Coalition for Smarter Growth,
oppose both the Southeastern Parkway and the U.S.
460 projects. Regarding the Parkway, coalition
executive director Stewart Schwartz says,
“It’s our suspicion that it is being used to
open new areas of development and does not do much
to relieve traffic.” The current plan, he adds,
“shifts investment in infrastructure to another
part of the region. It would further undermine
core cities.”
Robert
Cervero, a land use expert at the University of
California at Berkeley, while noting that he
doesn’t know specifics of the Hampton Roads
projects, says that “highways can induce growth
simply by virtue of providing access to previously
poorly accessible locations.” What happens, he
says, is up to local politicians. “If they
simply accede to developer interests and allow
growth to happen business-as- usual, my guess is
that in a fast-growing setting like Hampton Roads,
yes, a major parkway would unleash growth
pressures and threaten national treasures like the
Dismal Swamp.” The U.S. 460 corridor project
would pass near the northern part of the swamp.
Likewise,
the Southeastern Parkway could impact sensitive
waterways, Wetlands Watch believes. “The project
cuts across the headwaters and upper drainage
areas of the Back Bay Wildlife Refuge and the
North Landing River that drains into North
Carolina coastal bays,” John Blandin, president
of the group, wrote to VDOT in 2005. Back Bay is
undergoing great pressure form development, he
noted.
Even
when HRTA gets up and running and starts raising
money through its fee assessments, it is still
likely to be a few years until the Parkway
construction can start. HRTA and VDOT would have
to buy out property owners and negotiate to find
extra wetlands to mitigate those destroyed. Over
time, the total cost of the project is likely to
increase.
At
a minimum, Southeastern Parkway will change
forever rural parts of Virginia Beach and
Chesapeake that have so far resisted a
makeover into strip malls. Some local residents
say that sprawl will come about regardless of
whether the Parkway is built. But if the critics
are right, it’s a high price tag
to gain a few minutes driving time to the beach
front in vacation season.
-- August 30,
2007
|