<?php $nav = "http://" . $_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'] . "/du_includes/navigation.php"; include($nav); ?>

Articles


 

Subdivision Politics

 

Loudoun County is the fastest-growing locality in Virginia. The Smart Growth movement there combines face-to-face contact with interactive- media savvy.

 

By Bob Burke

 

If you want people to get involved in local issues, says Loudoun County activist Andrea McGimsey, nothing works better than a knock on the door.

           

That’s what she did in mid-2004, when she went house to house in some of the county’s newest developments, warning residents that they were in or near the path of a new highway, the Western Transportation Corridor. Not only did most people agree with her view that the road was a bad idea, she says, they liked talking face to face. “I think they appreciated that somebody was worried… about [their] family life,” she says.

 

When county leaders later backed away from plans for the highway, McGimsey claimed some credit for rallying the public opposition. “That really kicked things off out here,” she says. “The way I put it is, I gained people’s trust in the real world.”

 

Former AOL employee Andrea McGimsey

has moved from online marketing

to one-on-one activism in Loudoun County.

 

That effort helped launch the Campaign for Loudoun’s Future, an organization McGimsey leads that wants to channel the frustration residents there have about the county’s explosive growth in population and traffic. “A revolution is brewing,” is how McGimsey, 40, describes it.

 

Certainly something is brewing. Consider these numbers: In the past five years Loudoun’s population climbed 49 percent. That is equal to 82,700 new residents, putting the current estimated population at 253,300 people. And the challenge for McGimsey, and for anyone else who wants to influence Loudoun’s future, is how to reach these new residents before their opponents do.

 

It matters, because control of the county’s political power is up for grabs. Voters elected a slow-growth board in 1999, then went with a pro-growth majority in 2003, and now seems to be switching again. Loudoun gave strong support to Gov. Tim Kaine, who pushed growth control, and yesterday elected slow-growth Democrat Mark Herring to fill a vacant state senate seat.

 

One byproduct of the county’s rapid growth, McGimsey says, is that a lot of residents don’t know much about local issues or politics. “Many people don’t even know what their local form of government is,” she says. “When I talk about supervisors, people think I’m talking about my boss at work.”

 

The outreach to residents is the core of what McGimsey does. The Campaign for Loudoun’s Future counts about a dozen community groups among its membership, but it is not a grassroots group in a traditional sense. Though passionate about the campaign's issues, McGimsey is an employee. The campaign’s key funding source is the Warrenton- based Piedmont Environmental Council, the same group that helps finance the Road to Ruin project, which includes this article, for Bacon’s Rebellion

           

It was McGimsey's idea to create the group in fall 2004, in part to escape the “elitist” label that critics slap on the PEC. “It’s a campaign to get the word out about what’s being proposed for the county and to get citizens engaged,” she says.

 

McGimsey makes it easy for residents to support the campaign’s slow-growth positions. Its website, www.loudounsfuture.org, is filled with issue primers, links to members of the county board of supervisors and state legislators, and advice on how to get involved. It sends out frequent e-mail alerts to thousands of residents letting them know the latest news. Using the Internet to reach people makes sense in Loudoun, McGimsey says, because so many residents commute and have little time in the evenings to catch up with local issues. “They really have no time at all,” she says.

 

The Web strategy also reflects her background. Before joining the PEC, McGimsey spent five years with America Online working in interactive marketing and strategic development. She grew up in Springfield, graduated from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and earned a master’s from NYU’s Tisch School of the Arts.

 

She’s got a knack for marketing ideas. The campaign gives out “Don’t Supersize Loudoun!” bumper stickers, and has handed out free decals for commuters to stick on their windshields that asked, ‘Stuck in Traffic Again? Let your county supervisors know’ and then gave the phone number for the supervisors’ comment line.

 

The group made perhaps its biggest splash on election day 2004, when it put volunteers at some polling stations around the county to collect signatures for a petition that was really nothing more than a show of support. They handed out fliers that claimed the county was open to another 42,000 housing units under its current zoning.

 

They collected nearly 14,000 signatures in a day. “I was so stoked,” she says. “It was so exciting. I was saying, ‘Do you want to sign a petition against 42,000 houses?’ And people would just spin around.”

 

McGimsey and others touted the signatures as proof of the public’s support, but opponents were skeptical when the group would release only copies of the petitions. “They never presented them to the board, and we’ve asked them five, six, seven times,” says Stephen J. Snow, a Republican member of the board elected in 2003.

 

Snow is a good spokesman for the opposition. A retired Army colonel with a master’s in business management from Central Texas University, he is active in the current board’s transportation and land-use planning initiatives. He is also deeply skeptical of the campaign’s goals and of its motives. “They’re effective at putting out distorted information,” he says. “What they put out is not true, or if there’s any modicum of truth it’s cherry-picked.” 

 

Snow also thinks McGimsey is rallying people behind the wrong cause. “They’re just putting out stuff that doesn’t make any sense to me,” he says. The county is going to grow no matter what, he argues, and the new residents will help attract the commercial investment the county needs. Plus, the current board does consider the transportation impact of land-use decisions, he says. “We have what I judge to be true smart growth,” he says.

 

McGimsey counters that at the very least, she’s bringing residents into the debate about how the county will grow. “I’m not anti-developer. I just don’t want them to be basically the only ones at the negotiating table,” she says. “What I’m very proud about is that we really have gotten the word out. We’ve changed the dialogue in the county.”  

 

Bacon's Rebellion News Service

February 2, 2006

 

 

 

 

Contents

 

Road to Ruin page

 

About Road to Ruin

 

Archived articles