In
Virginia, we have the Democratic Party and the
Republican Party. And, then, we have the Ruling
Party.
Whatever
the election results in November -- regardless of
how many Ds and Rs wind up in the General Assembly
-- there's one thing we can count on: The same
moneyed interests who roamed the halls of the
Capitol last January will be back next year. While
legislators of the donkey clan and elephant clan may
joust over culture-war controversies from abortion
to illegal immigration, they will
quietly tend to the economic interests of the
powerful groups that bankroll them.
One
of those interests is the powerful real estate and construction sector.
From zoning approvals to
transportation spending, decisions made by state and
local government have a tremendous effect on
the profitability of developers, builders,
contractors and realtors. It's little surprise,
then, that the industry has donated $5.4 million so
far in 2007 to General Assembly electoral campaigns
-- more than any other industry.
Another
influential group is the electric utility industry,
which has donated $760,000 so far this year. Power
companies routinely invest $2 billion to $3 billion
to build a power plant, but they can't get more combustion for the buck
than they do from
political contributions.
While paying lip service to conservation and renewable
fuels, a law enacted this year ensures that Virginia will rely
primarily upon the
construction of big power plants and big
transmission lines to meet the state's energy needs.
As
Virginia confronts the challenges of the early 21st
century -- competing in a globally competitive,
knowledge-based economy -- citizens expect their
lawmakers to fashion policies that will help the
commonwealth adapt. But Virginia lawmakers are
beholden to an array of special interests that
manipulate the system for their own short-term
advantage. These forces of Business As Usual resist
change to the status quo that enriches them. Thus:
-
The
real estate-construction industry fights to
preserve the system that promotes and subsidizes
dysfunctional human settlement patterns.
Business As Usual maximizes private profits for
doing things the same old way, thwarts
innovative developers who want to depart from
approved templates, and drives up the cost of
serving the public with roads, transit,
utilities and public services.
-
Electric
utilities fight to preserve the Big Grid
electric system: giant power plants built in
remote locations and connecting to population
centers by high-voltage transmission lines.
Business As Usual stacks the deck against a
distributed grid system that would
encourage small-scale, entrepreneurial
investments in conservation and alternate energy
sources.
-
The
health care sector fights to preserve an
archaic system organized around general
hospitals rather than specialist facilities, and
transforms the health care professions into
government-sanctioned craft guilds. Business As
Usual stacks the deck against entrepreneurs who
would create innovative business models that
boost productivity and patient quality.
-
Public
employee associations fight to preserve
state and local government as a source of jobs
and patronage with minimal accountability.
Nowhere is this more evident, or harmful, than
Virginia's public schools. Legislators blindly
dump hundreds of millions of new dollars every
year into an ossified educational system that
rewards job creation for teachers and
administrators but stifles innovation at every
turn.
In
sum, the Ruling Party wields the power of the state
to entrench Business As Usual practices in critical
sectors of Virginia's economy. Virginia will never
negotiate the tricky transition to a knowledge-based
"wealth-creating system," as the future
Alvin Toffler terms it, unless it can dethrone its
ruling class.
Poke
around the list below, which was adapted from the
Virginia Public Access Project. Click on the links
to drill into the database for greater detail.
Here's what struck me: The status-quo industries are
massively over-represented. But two of the most
dynamic
sectors of the economy -- high-tech and
manufacturing -- are scarcely to be found.
While
a good number of technology executives individually
contribute funds to candidates, the high-tech sector
barely figures into the campaign calculus. The only
substantial player is the Northern Virginia
Technology Council, which has kicked in $52,750 so
far this year - about one twentieth the amount
donated by the Home Builders Association of
Virginia. The manufacturing sector, which accounts
for 15 percent or so of Virginia's economy, hardly
registers on the campaign-finance radar screen.
There
is a scary irony here. The high-tech and
manufacturing sectors are Virginia's productivity
and innovation leaders. They are globally
competitive. Many companies are world beaters. While
they may influence public policy at the federal
level, they aren't
organized effectively to elect lawmakers at the
level of state government. As a result, they
are largely AWOL when it comes to
setting a forward-looking agenda for Virginia.
Virginia's Ruling Party
|
Sector
|
Contributions
(2007)
|
Sector
Size
(billions)
|
Political |
$17,316,216 |
|
Real
Estate, Construction |
$5,413,376 |
$20.6 |
Law |
$3,644,259 |
|
Finance,
Insurance |
$3,638,960 |
$12.9 |
Technology,
Commun. (1) |
$3,227,709 |
$
4.0 |
Business,
Retail, Services |
$2,817,783 |
$13.1 |
Health
Care |
$2,781,778 |
$15.8 |
Miscellaneous |
$2,563,089 |
|
Transportation |
$2,018,524 |
$
6.0 |
Energy,
Natural Resources (2) |
$1,899,577 |
$
2.7 |
Public
Employees (3) |
$1,143,386 |
$54.0 |
Agriculture
(4) |
$1,047,025 |
$
0.5 |
Single-Issue
Groups |
$819,392 |
|
Organized
Labor |
$751,681 |
|
Defense |
$600,966 |
|
Undetermined |
$599,528 |
|
Manufacturing |
$355,643 |
$17.9 |
Note:
"Sector size" refers to the personal
income in Virginia derived from that industry
group, as defined by NAIC codes, in 2005.
(1)
Telecommunications sector only; does not
include IT professional services.
(2)
Mining, includes oil and gas + utilities
(3)
Includes federal civilian and military, state
and local government
(4)
Farms only
Source:
Virginia
Public Access Project and Bureau
of Economic Analysis |
What
other countervailing forces might there be to
Business As Usual? Well, there's the environmental
lobby. Drill down through "single issue
groups," and you'll see that environmentalists
contributed $110,000. That's pennies on the dollar
compared to what the real estate-construction
contributes.
Then,
of course, there is the fearsome no-taxes lobby. A VPAP search of the word
"taxpayer" reveals four organizations
contributing a grand total of $3,163. That may
explain why, when state spending in the 2007-2008
biennial budget increased 11 percent over the
previous budget, all the special interests howled
how critical state needs were being piteously short
changed. Yeah, right. Short-changed all the way to
the bank.
To
see how the system works, let's delve into the VPAP
statistics on Dominion Virginia Power, widely
acknowledged to be the most powerful single lobby in
Virginia. As a regulated utility, Dominion is at the
mercy of state regulators and legislators for its
profitability. Not surprisingly, Dominion executives
have concluded that their well being, and that of
Dominion shareholders, hinges upon their ability to
work the political system to their advantage.
Dominion
is omnipresent at the state capitol. The utility
has 18 representatives registered this year to lobby
legislators on its
behalf. The team is led by William
G. Thomas, arguably best connected lobbyist
in the state (See '"Senator'
Thomas") and Eva Teig Hardy, a former Baliles
administration insider, who reports directly to
Dominion's CEO.
The
company doesn't hire light weights. In May, Dominion tapped William L.
"Bill" Murray, the Kaine administration's legislative
director, to work as director of public policy. A month later, the power company
engaged Ann Loomis, chief of staff to U.S. Senator
John Warner, to advance its agenda in Washington,
D.C.
Dominion's
lobbyists rack up plenty of face time with
legislators -- and not just on the grounds of the
capitol complex. Over the past decade, the company
has spent $73,400 entertaining more than 100
lawmakers, hosting them in hunting trips and
Redskins football games, paying honoraria for
speeches, and taking them out to dinner. (See the VPAP
list of beneficiaries.) Special subjects of
attention include members of the House and Senate
Labor and Commerce committees, who rule on
utility-related legislation.
Dominion
also taps a war chest exceeding $500,000 to dispense
among favored candidates, nearly all of them
incumbents. But the utility saves most of its
largesse for the most senior and powerful
legislators -- those with the most influence over
future committee assignments and legislation. This
year, in contrast to the previous several years,
Dominion tilted strongly in favor of Democratic
candidates, although it more than amply covered its
bet with key Republicans. (See VPAP
list of donations.)
Compare
that to the largest environmental PAC in Virginia,
the Virginia League of Conservation Voters, which
consolidates the campaign contributions of several
Virginia environmental groups in order to leverage
them for maximum impact. VLCV has contributed
$50,300 so far this year, channeling more than half
into a single campaign, that of Albert Pollard, a
Democrat with a strong environmental track record running for
state senate. The League lacks the resources to
compete against Dominion or the home builders across
the board.
At
present, there seems little hope of dislodging
Virginia's Ruling Class. Funded by Business As Usual,
donkeys and elephants are happy to distract
citizens over symbolic but emotion-laden culture war
issues. Third parties less receptive to the status quo can't launch viable candidates because
they can't raise any money. Meanwhile, the fourth
estate is inert, serving up an increasing diet of
cotton candy in a desperate bid to retain readers, and abandoning any pretense to investigative journalism.
What
could dynamite Business As Usual's hold on
Virginia's political system? Perhaps some
unimaginable crisis like oil at $200 a barrel,
rising sea levels inundating Hampton Roads or a
bankrupt social security system that discredits the
two-party system. Perhaps the demise of traditional
media monopolies and the emergence of some new
model, as yet unknown, for gathering and
disseminating information. Perhaps disruptive waves
of technology -- robots, artificial intelligence,
nano-technology and 150-year human life spans -- that
render all of our old institutions irrefutably
obsolete. Or maybe nothing at all. Ever. This is,
after all, the Old Dominion.
--
October 29, 2007
|