Perhaps
We Should Call Them
"Safe
Street" Fees
Totally
lost in the controversy over "abuser
fees" is the fact that they work. Stiff
penalties for reckless driving has resulted in...
less reckless driving!
Early
this summer Virginia's news media began focusing
on the new transportation bill and the potential
for one controversial part of it to blow up in faces of those who
supported it.
While
more profound matters went un-debated --
for instance, are “unelected” transportation
authorities in Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads
permitted under the state constitution? -- the
so-called “abuser fees” provision caught fire.
The propriety of higher penalties for reckless
drivers became a hot topic in the media, on the
Internet blogs, and at local Rotary Clubs and
Chambers of Commerce. Even now, they are fodder
for political mail and TV attack ads.
Many
voters got stirred up over what was said to be
fees of “up to $3,000" for reckless driving. The
discovery that out-of-state drivers were exempted only stoked their anger.
Shallow
reporting by the media fed the bonfire. Yes, the
bill did impose fees as high as $3,000 -- but only
for those who killed someone while driving
recklessly. Frankly, the only thing that
upsets me about a $3,000 fee for needlessly taking a life is
that it's too low! I have met no one who thinks
that three grand is too harsh a penalty for needlessly
taking a life.
But
after news about these “abuser fees”
riled up the voters and some 180,000 folks signed
an on-line petition in opposition to them, the
politicians understood that some changes were
necessary. And those changes are coming.
What’s
fascinating is how silent the media has been about
the positive impact of the fees on the safety of roads.
I
drive up and down Interstate 81 several times a
year and I find that those dangerous 18-wheelers
that used to speed, ride our bumper, and weave in
and out of traffic are much more tame. Folks who live along this major highway have told
me the same thing. Interstate 95 is safer
as well.
Now
the State Police statistics tell a story of safety
on our roads that the media has conveniently
decided not to talk about. As Paul Harvey likes to
say, “Here’s the rest of the story.”
Since
the abuser fees became law on July 1st, speeding
tickets are down 5.4 percent and the much more
dangerous reckless driving tickets are down by
19.7 percent.
Clearly,
our roads are getting safer and only on thing has
changed that could have
produced these dramatic reductions in bad driving
-- the implementation of the much-abused abuser fees. Nothing else has
happened to produce these results.
While
tweaks to the abuser-fee legislation are needed,
and will be forthcoming, it is only right and
proper for the media to inform that public that
our roads have become safer since July 1st. But
the media isn't getting the facts out. The silence
makes one wonder if these newspapers, radio &
TV stations and the blogosphere on the left and
right are more interested in stirring the pot than
in having a serious public policy debate based on
facts.
Out-of-state
drivers need to be part of any new bill focused on
reckless drivers, and a graduated fine structure
based on how fast the reckless driver is going
should be considered. Minor violations such as
failure to use a turn signal should be dropped
altogether.
In
the meantime, voters should know that abuser fees
have made our roads safer. That means our spouses
are safer and our kids are safer -- a fact that
goes to the core of any public policy discussion.
As
Virginia enters the final weeks of this year’s
campaign, the media has an obligation to get out
the facts about our safer streets. But don’t
hold your breath.
--
October 1, 2007
|