|
Although
no official, state or local, or any citizen,
voting or not, could claim that the Northern
Virginia Transportation Authority (NVTA) is a
perfect organization with perfect representation
or a perfect funding stream, NVTA is gaining
respect for the business-like manner in which it
is tackling its newly robust public transportation
agenda. Its five-hour meeting the evening of July
12 at a Falls Church school shows why.
After
a three-hour period for public comment, the NVTA
calmly worked through an agenda that included
resolutions to implement the provisions of HB3202
and provide itself with bond, legal counsel and
financial services capabilities. HB3202, of
course, is the Virginia General Assembly’s
compromise transportation package that, with a
wink to Virginia Dillon’s Rule traditions, ceded
huge chunks of transportation planning, finance
and project execution to the authority, originally
created in 2002, and a second regional entity now
established in Hampton Roads. Its chief patron was
Speaker of the House William J. Howell.
Tops
on the NVTA agenda were seven resolutions, each to
approve a regional tax or fee suggested by the
General Assembly to fund regional and local
projects in the NVTA’s jurisdictions. For those
keeping score, the revenue measures include a a
one percent increase in the initial vehicle
registration fee, a $10 regional vehicle
registration renewal fee, a $10 increase in the
vehicle safety inspection fee and a five percent
sales tax on auto repair labor costs (another wink
at the notion that Virginia only has a sales tax
on goods). Then come an increase of $0.40 per $100
of sale price on property stales (grantors tax)
and two percent increases in the transient
occupancy tax and motor vehicle rental tax.
Most
passed 12 to 2 with support coming from the
representatives of the Arlington, Fairfax and
Prince William County boards, the councils of
Alexandria, Fairfax City, Falls Church, Manassas
and Manassas Park, two appointees of the Governor
and two members of the General Assembly. Loudoun
County Chairman Scott York expressed concerns
about the effects on his locality of “ovelapping”
NVTA bonded indebtedness and the wisdom of raising
real estate taxes even at the time of a sale given
current market conditions. Curiously, a third
member of the General Assembly, Del. Jeffrey
Frederick, opposed each resolution despite “representing”
the Speaker of the House.
The
annual total from these regional sources of
revenue is estimated to be over $300 million,
revenues that can and will be used to back
transportation bonds. So, as each of the new
revenue sources gained approval under the NVTA’s
complicated formulas -- 10 out of 14 of the voting
members must approve, including two-thirds of the
nine local government members and local government
members who represent at least two-thirds of the
population of the region -- a calm, perhaps not
totally unrelated to the lateness of the hour,
came over the proceeding. Five years after nine
Northern Virginia senators and nine Northern
Virginia delegates patroned legislation to create
NVTA in its current form, NVTA members were
establishing the procedures by which regional
project activity could proceed as early as 2008.
With
political polls showing transportation as the
number one voter concern in an election year and a
public comment period across several jurisdictions
that produced overwhelming support for regional
taxes and fees from desperate commuters, NVTA
members seized what advocates called “the best
opportunity in 20 years” to expand a neglected
transportation system.
Not
only are new revenues on the way, but NVTA voted
to establish only a small staff, including an
executive director, and to use strict criteria to
establish and prioritize projects, such as
suggested in its TransAction 2030 plan. It
established a technical advisory committee to be
made up of professionals with transportation
planning, finance, construction, legal and other
technical expertise to assist its work as required
by its enabling legislation. But its resolution
also suggests that the committee include
multi-modal expertise and a regional focus.
Most
importantly to many regional residents, NVTA
pulled $102 million worth of projects together for
an initial bond issuance. NVTA weighed projects
“ready to go,” that were priorities of local
jurisdictions, that provided some balance across
mode of transportation and could improve
congestion, safety or transit capacity in its
first list. These and future projects will ensure
that federal, state and private mega-projects,
such as the Springfield Interchange (officially
complete this week), the Woodrow Wilson Bridge,
HOT Lanes and Rail to Dulles, will not keep other
equally critical connections from going forward.
And NVTA authorized the filing of a bond
validation suit on July 13 to seek an early court
ruling on its constitutional powers to proceed.
“All
in a day’s work” is the phrase often used to
describe the successful outcome of a long and
complex process. It is a happy shrug-off of all
the difficulties and divisions that have had to be
overcome in order to accomplish something
important and enduring. Members of the NVTA were
neither unanimous in their views, nor hesitant to
highlight the shortcomings of the regional
initiatives they were bringing to life on July 12.
But the record shows that members were determined
that night to give the Northern Virginia region a
brighter, more self-directed transportation
future. That the economic engine of the
Commonwealth may run more smoothly is good news
across Virginia.
--
July 16, 2007
|