Call
for a "Roads Blueprint"
Between
the new taxes just enacted and financing by the
private sector, Virginia should have ample funds
to keep traffic congestion under control. The
trick is crafting a plan and sticking to it.
After
the congratulatory high-fives by legislative
leaders for solving Virginia's traffic problems
for decades to come, it is time for a reality
check.
A
lot of new money will flow into transportation
thanks to the bill recently passed by the General
Assembly and signed by the Governor. That money
buys Virginia some time. But if the state and the
regional transportation authorities don’t spend
their new money wisely, Virginia is destined to
years more of congestion, gridlock and a
deteriorating lifestyle.
Unfortunately,
much of the money in The Comprehensive
Transportation Funding and Reform Act of 2007 is
reserved for mass transit, even though only a
fraction of those caught in the daily congestion
nightmare ride METRO and there is no reason to
believe they will change. Furthermore, the
extension of METRO in Northern Virginia to Dulles airport will cost far more than
$4 billion figure commonly cited. Most rapid rail
projects end up costing two to three times the
original estimate. If this holds true, Rail to
Dulles could cost $8 billion to $12 billion
dollars, draining funds from other priority
transportation projects.
Also
of concern: In the next twenty years more than
500,000 more people will move into Northern
Virginia, and another million or more throughout
the state. Without action, congestion will get
worse in Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads along
with Richmond. Even smaller cities such as
Charlottesville are expected to see a huge
increase in traffic.
Virginia
needs to craft a long-term transportation
plan, a "Roads Blueprint", to set
priorities through 2030. The goal needs to be
relieving congestion on roads, not expanding mass
transit, bike trails and other transportation
modes of limited value. Elected officials need to
stick by the plan, and to alter it only when
population shifts or economic growth alters the
requirements.
The
basis for such a “Roads Blueprint” can be
found in a study recently commissioned by the
Reason Foundation. That plan outlines how just $13
billion of road improvements -- $10 billion in
projects in Northern Virginia and $3 billion in
the rest of the state -- can keep congestion in
check through 2030 if executed carefully and
professionally.
This
“Roads Blueprint” could be funded by the
public sector, private sector or a combination of
both. Virginia should open up to private resources
more than it has to date. In West Virginia, the
King Coal Highway was funded by the mining
industry. In New Mexico U.S. 550 was built using a
public-private partnership in 3˝
years instead of 27 years as the
state transportation department had planned. Indiana sold
its toll road and funded much of its ten-year
transportation plan. Pennsylvania is considering
leasing its statewide toll road system for 30
years, and New Jersey is considering a similar
plan. A huge amount of private investment is
available here in Virginia for a serious and well
thought out “Roads Blueprint.”
Needed
improvements on I-81, the third crossing in
Virginia Beach, expanding I-66 inside the Beltway
in Arlington, HOT lanes and Bus Rapid Transit
system are all open to private investment.
Virginia
also should bid out the maintenance of its primary
roads and possibly even its secondary roads. Done
correctly, such a management decision could save
billions of dollars by 2030, and the savings could
be poured back into maintenance. That beats
raising taxes, fees or tolls.
Meanwhile,
our counties need to grow up and take
responsibility for their own secondary roads and,
where possible, the primary roads that run through
their jurisdictions. Fully 46 states give this
responsibility to counties and cities. Why should
Virginia be any different? It is time to change.
--
April 16, 2007
|