Outside
the coalfields of the far southwest, Virginia has
never been regarded as an energy-rich state. The
oil and gas reserves off the coast have generated
some attention recently, but the biggest treasure
trove of energy may be not what lies beneath the
surface but what blows above.
According
to a team of Virginia Tech researchers, the
continental shelf off Virginia is an ideal location
to harness the power of wind to generate
electricity. "It's
better than Cape Cod," site of a widely
publicized effort to build a wind farm, says Saifur Rahman, an
electrical engineering professor with Tech's
Advanced Research Institute in Arlington. "It's one of the best locations on
the East Coast."
Several
miles off Virginia's coast the winds are strong and
reliable -- classified as Class 5 and Class 6 winds,
ideal for power generation. The water is relatively
shallow, so installing wind turbines would not
encounter formidable engineering challenges.
Turbines could be located far enough offshore that
they'd be invisible from the beach resorts on a hazy
summer day. And Virginia is situated far enough north that
wind farms would be rarely threatened by hurricanes.
Using
technology and engineering already being implemented
in Europe, a wind farm with a footprint the size of
Virginia Beach -- about three percent of Virginia's
continental shelf -- could supply the equivalent of
20 percent of the Commonwealth's current electricity
needs. "People don't think of Virginia as a
windy state," says Rahman. And it's not -- on
land. "But we have very good wind
off-shore."
George
Hagerman, an electrical engineering professor and
colleague of Rahman, envisions wind power forming the basis of a
sizeable new industry in Hampton Roads. Not only
would operating the wind farms constitute a
formidable business opportunity, so would
fabrication and installation of the off-shore
turbines -- an activity that would seem to be well
suited to the region's ship building and repair
industry.
Off-shore
wind farms would sidestep the environmental problems
posed by land-based farms, such as the controversial
project in Highland County. If located 12 nautical
miles offshore, the turbines would appear as barely
visible flecks on the horizon. You'd have to be
sitting on the roof of the Ramada Hotel with a
binoculars, quips Hagerman -- and even then, you'd
have to know where to look.
Furthermore,
the turbines would be located well away from the
migratory paths of ducks, geese and other birds,
which stick to the marshlands during their flights.
Declares Hagerman: "It's a win-win-win!"
|
The
Mid-Atlantic coastline offers the greatest
opportunity on the East Coast for wind-powered
electric generation.
The
purple band indicates Class 5 power density
and the red Class 6. Virginia does have Class
5 and 6 power densities on land but, limited
to ridge lines of major mountain chains, they
appear as no more than pinpricks on the map.
Map:
courtesy of Virginia Tech Advanced Research
Institute. |
Just
as Texas was endowed by nature with large reservoirs
of oil, Tech researchers contend, the Mid-Atlantic is meteorologically blessed
-- by the contour of its coastline, the
veering off of the Gulf Stream and other factors
that affect the velocity and regularity of wind.
But the optimistic appraisal of
Virginia's wind resources is based on an extension
of land-based computer models that can break down 20
or 30 miles offshore. The quality of data is not yet
good enough for someone to build a business
case for investing. "We need to find out the
distribution of the wind source, how it varies over
time," Hagerman says.
The
next phase of research is to compile and integrate
several large bodies of data in order to confirm or
disprove the computer models. The National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration has collected a large
body of weather data. So has the Army Corps of
Engineers during its work rebuilding the beaches in
Virginia Beach. There are other data sets collected
by airports and lighthouses. "Someone
needs to take ownership of it," says Hagerman.
"The data was done for different purposes. We
need to rework it."
And
that's a bit of a problem. There are no readily
available funds to underwrite such a project.
It's not "researchy" enough, says
Hagerman. He's hoping that the state of Virginia
will recognize the economic development potential
and decide to underwrite the research.
If
further research confirms the computer models, Hagerman
expects development of Virginia's wind potential to
occur in phases -- maybe blocks of 300 to 350 megawatts
of wind turbines at a time. (That compares to 1,000
megawatts for a typical coal-fired power plant.)
Clusters of turbines would be stationed several
miles offshore where they would be all but invisible
to
tourists frolicking in the surf -- yet close enough
to constitute a tour boat attraction.
The
electric power would run through buried cables. No ugly
transmission lines to fuss about. Buried cable is a
must to protect against waves,
currents, dragging anchors, trawling gear, currents
and, yes, even shark bites, Hagerman says. "The cable would
only see the light of day at a sub-station near
shore, where it would connect to the grid."
A
decade or two from now, Virginia may find
wind turbines co-existing miles offshore with oil- and
gas-drilling platforms, assuming the concerns of
regulators and environmentalists can be met. Looking
two or three decades ahead, Hagerman foresees the
potential to develop other off-shore energy
resources in a synergistic system.
Wave
energy has reached the same point where wind energy
was in the 1980s, Hagerman says. The first
wave-energy pilot plants are just now being build -- there's
one off the coast of Portugal, for instance.
Preliminary indications are that Virginia is a
suitable location for wave energy. He speculates
that it may be possible to build floating platforms
that combine wind and wave power-generation.
Experiments
in the 1970s and '80s also demonstrated that kelp
and algae can be converted can be farmed at sea,
desalted, anaerobically digested and converted into
natural gas, Hagerman says. A different process has
been shown to convert single-celled diatoms into
diesel fuel. All this, he suggests, could be
performed in Virginia's off-shore waters.
Says
Hagerman: "With the right kind of roadmap and
research supporting that roadmap, you could start
with today’s offshore wind technology, then down
the road, go [into] deeper [waters], then add wave
energy, then produce liquid fuels offshore. A super
combination would be combining offshore wind and
wave, which are intermittent, with liquid fuels from
marine biomass, which could run a gas turbine -- all
with one cable to the shore."
Hagerman's
full-blown scenario may sound pie-in-the-sky, but
the wind farms are not. The Europeans are pushing
applications -- wind blades the size of Boeing 747s,
wind farms miles offshore -- that once seemed unimaginable. The Germans,
British, Spaniards and Scandinavian countries are
moving aggressively, driving technological
improvements, creating economies of scale and making
wind-power increasingly competitive with fossil
fuels. Forecasts call for Germany to nearly double
its wind-farm capacity by 2030, with almost all of
the growth coming from off-shore installations. The
U.S. lags five to 10 years behind.
The
Kaine administration is preparing a state energy
policy to secure dependable and affordable supplies for Virginia's
future. Wind-farms, once thought to be a niche power
source, clearly hold the potential to become a
significant contributor to the Commonwealth's energy
portfolio. If Virginia gets the jump on other states
in opening up this non-polluting energy source, it
also could become a center for the fabrication,
installation and maintenance of maritime wind farms
throughout North America.
"Virginia is in a
position to become a national leader," says
Hagerman. "Why not start now?"
--
November 20, 2006
|