A Different Voice

Ron Utt


 

The Bridal Path to Nowhere

 

How Virginia can beat its traffic woes: Stop wasting money on dumb projects, establish performance measures and don't give municipalities more power over land use!


 

Once in office, Gov. Tim Kaine wasted no time proposing a big increase in transportation spending financed by a package of regressive taxes falling disproportionately on those with modest incomes. Shortly afterward, the governor's echo chamber in the Senate offered a similar plan with a slightly different set of regressive taxes.

 

The House of Delegates, by contrast, proposed to spend half the Senate's amount without a tax increase. With ordinary folks already burdened by high energy prices, the Senate's warm embrace of trickle-up economics seems oddly out of place.

 

Because none of these plans offers motorists any assurance their tax dollars will be well-spent and congestion relieved, one can only hope that the governor's half-baked schemes are never enacted. Instead, our elected representatives should take a look at the innovations adopted in some other states and use that information to develop a plan that improves mobility in a cost-effective way.

 

Where Virginia once led the nation in transportation innovations widely copied by others, the past several years have seen an absence of any leadership, a diversion of state fuel-tax revenues to non-transportation purposes, and a failed effort to address perceived funding shortfalls by increasing regional tax burdens on individuals. As a consequence of this floundering, traffic congestion has worsened.

 

According to the Texas Transportation Institute's most recent annual urban-mobility report (2003) on the Travel Time Index for 85 U.S metropolitan areas, the D.C.-Virginia-Maryland region is ranked fourth worst in the nation with a TTI of 1.51, compared with 1.44 in 2000. (A TTI of 1.51 means rush-hour traffic times are 51 percent longer than off-peak.)

 

Over the same period, Virginia Beach's TTI has gone from 1.16 to 1.21 and now ranks 39th worst in the nation versus 48th in 2000. Richmond, too, is working its way "up" to poorer performance, rising from 75th worst in 2000 to 69th in the most recent period.

 

To reverse this deterioration in the quality of travel in the state, Kaine and members of the General Assembly need to focus on three deficiencies in the state's transportation policy.

 

First, stop wasting money!

 

While much of America learned of the tremendous waste in the federal highway program when the media outed Alaska's infamous "Bridge to Nowhere," that focus diverted attention from the other 6,300 pork-barrel earmarks in the legislation. Indeed, Virginians had the misfortune of getting 152 federal earmarks, including the Bridle Path to Nowhere (Jefferson National Forest), the Water Mill to Nowhere (Abingdon), and the Train Station to Nowhere (Bristol and Fries)--all of which will misuse many millions of dollars of the state's five-year federal allotment.

 

Of course, the state government gets its own little pot of money--called the "enhancement program"--to build more of the same. VDOT's Web site reveals that its own "Nowhere Collection" includes the Crab Orchard Museum, the Coal Heritage Museum, the La Crosse Hotel, and the Colonial Theater, to name four of the 108 projects taking money from transportation needs.

 

Second, establish a meaningful performance-based measurement system.

 

VDOT became one of the nation's most innovative DOTs in 1995 when it enacted the Public-Private Partnership Transportation Act to encourage private-sector investors and builders to propose transportation projects and provide the funding to complete them. Thanks to the PPTA, one project has been built and a couple more will soon get under way.

 

But that was VDOT's last hurrah, and in recent years the state has lagged others, most notably in its failure to adopt quantitative performance measures and cost/benefit analyses to guide its operations and require accountability. Instead, Virginia has a confused and contradictory system that places little value on congestion mitigation while pursuing intangible goals like economic development (exemplified by the new $50 million interchange for the Stafford airport!), and greater "transportation choices," as if VDOT were running a multimodal affirmative-action program based upon a No Trolley Left Behind approach to investment.

 

While the state- and federally funded High Knob Horse Trail will be fun for those who can afford to own a horse, it has nothing to do with transportation, congestion relief, or improved safety.

 

Third, don't give municipalities any more power in land-use regulation.

 

Although Virginia's counties whine about how little power they have to guide growth and development, in fact they have considerable control over growth through the authority to zone and rezone and to charge proffers. In recent years, these powers have been exercised in abusive and counter-productive schemes that worsen traffic congestion and undermine housing affordability as pervasive shortages of available land lead to escalating prices for new and existing homes.

 

Indeed, in a process not unlike the state government's growing fondness for regressive taxes, these rezonings have made Virginia much more accommodative to the well-to-do as substantial tracts of land in Loudoun, Stafford, Prince William, Fauquier, and Spotsylvania have been down-zoned to discourage the construction of housing affordable to the average family.

 

At the same time, public officials and zoning boards have become increasingly hostile to higher-density development that would shorten commutes and economize on transportation infrastructure. A consequence of these coercive rationing and relocation schemes is that moderate-income families are forced farther away from their jobs, and are compelled to trade long commutes for a decent home of their own. But the cost they bear in these commutes is shared by all of us. Where in a rational world these involuntary exiles would have had 20- to 30-mile commutes from Loudoun or Prince William, and could have chosen to be clustered in communities with higher densities, they are instead forced to the region's distant fringes.

 

While Gov. Kaine's transportation ideas have yet to evolve to a plan that would benefit ordinary Virginians, he deserves praise for recognizing that past neglect by the state of its responsibility is a big part of the problem.

 

Having met with Virginia's "professional citizens" on his postelection listening tour, it's now time to look for guidance and ideas in states that have already developed sophisticated policies to reduce congestion and enhance safety.

 

This column was published originally in the August 4, 2006, edition of the Free Lance-Star.

 

-- September 25, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This column was published July 17, 2006, and circulated widely by the Virginia Institute for Public Policy shortly before the vote by the United States House of Representatives on an amendment to the Deep Water Energy Resources Act. The House passed the measure.

 

Ronald D.   Utt is Senior Research Fellow for the Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies at The Heritage Foundation where he conducts research on housing, transportation, and the federal budget.

 

View his Heritage Institute profile here.