|
Almost
every American takes a little beach time in the
summer, whether along a lake, a bay or the ocean.
It’s part of the ritual and rhythm of the season
for families everywhere. A bright sun makes things
good. Clean, safe water makes things better. But
increasingly that plunge into beach waters means
another tradition – Americans unknowingly swimming
in human and animal waste that can make them sick.
That’s why
reading a just released report from the National
Resources Defense Council (NRDC) might be a safer
beach activity in certain places this month than
swimming. In “Testing the Waters 2006,” the NRDC
documents a five- percent jump in “No Swimming!”
beach closings and advisories nationwide to more
than 20,000 total days in 2005. Two hundreds
swimming beaches violated public health standards at
least 25 percent of the time. The contributing
factors are familiar -- heavy rainfall that
increases runoff, booming development in coastal
areas, unremediated source pollution and, yes, more
monitoring.
The NRDC warns
further that even beaches that meet current beach
water standards may not be safe. Current standards
are two decades old and rely on obsolete monitoring
standards and science. In the BEACH Act of 2000, the
Congress required the federal Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) to revise beach water
quality standards by October 2005. But EPA missed
the deadline and now suggests 2011 as a better
target. NRDC sued EPA on August 3 to force EPA to
obey the law.
In the Mid-Atlantic
region, Maryland and Pennsylvania were alarmingly
high on the list of non-compliers, well above the
national average. But there is some good news for
Virginia and other parts of the region. Delaware had
the lowest percentage of beach water samples from
its 21 beach areas exceed national standards.
Virginia’s 50 beaches had samples that exceeded
national standards only two percent of the time,
third best among 29 coastal states. And North
Carolina had about three percent non- compliance
among its 245 beach areas.
NDRC, in fact,
noted that Virginia has used funds in 2001-2002 to
incorporate monitoring programs already underway in
Virginia Beach and Norfolk into a statewide,
coordinated beach monitoring program. The
Commonwealth used a $279,920 federal BEACH Act grant
in 2005 and another for $276,900 in 2006 to continue
to improve the Commonwealth’s annual monitoring,
closing and advisory program. The results have been
impressive. Total days of advisories in Virginia
decreased 71 percent to 42 in 2005 from 147 in 2004
and there were no beach closings in Virginia in 2005
But there were
Virginia beaches in 2005 where enterococcus bacteria
levels did increase risk of gastro-intestinal
illness as well as ear and eye infections in
swimmers. Specifically cited were Fairview Beach in
King George County, King-Lincoln Beach and Hilton
Beach in Newport News, all of which had samples
exceeding national standards over 20 percent of the
time. At this time in 2006, only 63rd Street Beach
in Virginia Beach is under a swimming advisory, but
concerned citizens should seek out up-to-date
information on all state beaches at the Virginia
Department of Health Website.
No one would
disagree that Virginia’s up-to-date information
always should be “Safe” in an ideal world. How
does Virginia get there? Immediate and substantial
investments in upgrading sewage treatment plants in
Virginia and improving farming practices to limit
runoff are an obvious response to the challenge.
Another is renewed pressure on the EPA to upgrade
public health standards and testing methods ASAP.
Remember: There is more at risk than public health,
as significant as that is. Coastal tourism
contributes more than 200,000 jobs and $16.5 billion
annually to Virginia’s economy.
A targeted response
would improve monitoring and remedial actions at
specific locations. Under contract to the Virginia
Department of Health, for example, Virginia Tech in
2005 assessed in detail the possible sources of
fecal contamination that led to the larger number of
swimming advisories in 2004. The VT scientific team
under Dr. Charles Hagedorn found that seven of the
most problematic beaches had been damaged by
Hurricane Isabel in September 2003. Beach
restoration projects in 2004 and 2005 helped reduce
the level of pollution from human sources and
improve water quality conditions. The message, then,
is that improvements in beach water quality and in
information about that quality are possible.
New standards,
increased monitoring, investments in new sewage
treatment plants and more responsible behavior from
individuals all are part of the solution. Dispose of
toxic household products, motor oil and animal waste
properly. Dedicate a source of revenue from tourism
dollars to the effort (studies peg coastal tourism
at $30 billion a year nationwide and
manufacturers’ take from sunscreen sales alone at
$640 million annually). Give Virginians headed to
California, South Carolina or Mississippi beaches
access to information to make good judgments about
beach time reading and beach time swimming. Both are
better than beach time pinkeye, skin rash or
respiratory infection. Now pass the 45.
--
August 7 , 2006
|