Patrick McSweeney


 

Break the Tax-and-Spend Cycle

Many politicians, and the reporters who cover them, regard bloating state budgets as inevitable. But that's true only if voters settle for the same-old, same-old.


 

The Virginia General Assembly came perilously close to producing no state budget before its deadline of June 30. The final product wasn’t pretty, but it was better than no budget at all.

 

Or was it? We saw the alternative -- a state without a budget -- when the New Jersey legislature could not reach agreement before its current fiscal year began on July 1, 2006. For a week, Gov. Jon Corzine furloughed state employees, closed state-run casinos in Atlantic City and took other painful steps to shut down that state’s governmental operations while he and legislative leaders negotiated a compromise.

 

One Richmond-based journalist opined that the New Jersey outcome was preferable to Virginia’s. He reasoned that New Jersey, unlike Virginia, actually faced up to its need to increase taxes even though the government shutdown in the Garden State caused much disruption and long-term harm to that state’s reputation. Once again, the pro-tax bias of the media was on display.

 

The underlying presupposition of many in the media is that there is no choice other than to increase taxes every few years to accommodate a rising population and the growing complexity of our social and economic conditions. This view takes the constant expansion of government as a given.

 

One wonders if these media types have thought about the inevitable end of such a process, which will come when government has nothing left to tax.

 

There are many reasons for the constant expansion of government, but inevitability isn’t one of them. The principal reasons are the absence of political leadership and the want of imagination on the part of the public.

 

Consider government’s role in transportation.  Politicians like the current pattern even though it hasn’t been working for decades. They point to their efforts to bring home the bacon in the form of new transportation projects. They issue press releases when projects are announced. They relish the photo opportunity when they don hard hats and turn a shovel of earth in the symbolic beginning of construction. They have another photo opportunity at the ribbon-cutting ceremony that puts the project in service. If they are in office long enough, they may even have projects named after them.

 

Because politicians and the media repeat the proposition that more government spending will relieve traffic congestion, the public tends to believe there is no other option. Politicians refuse to acknowledge the futility of addressing traffic problems with more of the same failed strategy. The commuter stuck in traffic and the parent struggling to ferry a child to soccer practice in gridlock conditions want something done. This is the perfect storm for another massive tax hike.  

 

The same pressures produced the 1986 transportation tax increase. That infusion of general tax revenues didn’t make a dent in traffic congestion then and another tax revenue infusion won’t work now for the same reason.

 

The causes of congestion are many and their interplay highly complex. It’s easier for politicians to support another tax hike than to explain why a different strategy is needed. Yet, a majority of Virginians repeatedly demonstrate that they are ahead of the politicians and the media. Most understand at some level that the tax-and-spend approach can’t continue forever, particularly if they lived through the 1986 experience of being promised a solution if only taxes were increased.

 

Gov. Timothy M. Kaine campaigned on opposition to pouring more money into new transportation projects without considering the impact on growth and development. He seems to have forgotten that position, just as he has ignored his campaign statements that he wouldn’t support a tax increase.

 

Unless a major shift in policy occurs, Virginia is heading toward another fleecing of the average taxpayer with no hope of improving the overall transportation system. More roads may be built with increased tax revenues, but relief will be short-term at best.

 

Let’s look at the history of one project to illustrate the point. The final 17-mile segment of Route 288 on the west of the Richmond region was financed with general tax revenues and relied heavily on debt. It drained millions of dollars from other regions of the state. Much of the general fund surplus spent on transportation as a result of the 2005 state budget amendments went to pay off the Route 288 debt.

 

When the final 17-mile leg of Route 288 went into service in 2004, it was already at Level of Service B (A being the most desirable and F being absolute gridlock). The Virginia Department of Transportation projects Level of Service F for this segment by the year 2010.

 

The reason is that this project, as is the case with so many new road projects, generates far more traffic than it could possibly relieve and accelerates the pattern of sprawl that makes any future transportation fix prohibitively expensive.

 

Virginia has an opportunity to break this unfortunate tax-and-spend pattern in 2006. Will the politicians meet that challenge or will we look back a decade from now and wonder why they showed so little foresight and courage?

 

-- July 24, 2006

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contact Information

 

McSweeney & Crump

11 South Twelfth Street
Richmond, VA 23219
(804) 783-6802

pmcsweeney@

   mcbump.com

 

Read his profile and back columns here.