Guest Column

Conaway Haskins


 

 

Teaching our Teachers

 

Virginia seems ill-prepared to deal with a looming teacher shortage. One solution might be to re-think the policies of its education schools.


 

With the General Assembly entangled in an extended session over transportation gridlock, other issues have taken a backseat in the public consciousness. Despite the lip service given to educational improvements in the 2005 elections, no major changes in the Commonwealth’s delivery of education services have emerged, leaving true improvements wanting.

 

This is not necessarily a bad thing, considering that 92 percent of Virginia's public schools meet statewide standards for student performance. The Commonwealth has developed and implemented among the most stringent elementary and secondary education standards in the nation. Although some school districts still fail in their duty to that are failing in their duty to educate students, particularly lower-income and minority children, the notion that Virginia’s schools are broken is suspect. 

 

One important issue, however, still needs resolution -- teacher training and credentialing. If one peers past the current, seemingly encouraging statistics, a significant problem is looming.

 

According the Commonwealth’s educational report card, the percentage of teachers covering core instructional subjects who fall short of standards set by federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) standards has declined from over 16.5 percent four years ago to 4.4 percent last year. Forty-three percent of all teachers have earned a masters degree or higher. Under NCLB, core academic subjects are those such as English, reading or language arts, mathematics, science, foreign languages, civics and government, economics, art, history and geography.

 

There are spots of concern. In high-poverty districts, the percentage rises to 6.5 percent, compared to 2.8 percent in low-poverty districts. Another 7.1 percent of teachers have earned only “provisional” licensing. Overall, these numbers are satisfactory -- for the moment. But they do not take into account current and future teacher shortages in classrooms across the state.

 

According the Virginia Department of Education’s 2002 Report on Supply and Demand of Instructional Personnel in Virginia: 2001-2002, “Estimates of the supply of teachers and administrators over the next five years provide little remedy for the current shortages. Although teaching programs graduate many new teachers each year in Virginia, the rate of retirements and attrition is increasing. Research at the national level has projected significant and growing shortages throughout the country, particularly in the endorsement areas of science, mathematics, foreign languages, and special education. Data from the 2001-2002 survey concur with national projections.”

 

In 2002, more than four percent of available teaching positions went unfilled statewide, with higher gaps in Fairfax and Southside Virginia, areas on opposite ends of the socioeconomic spectrum. With the impending retirements of Baby Boomers, an even bigger shortage looms. The supply is not sufficient to offset retirements and demand created by increasing enrollments.

 

A number of responses have been proposed, notably the career switcher programs, alternative licensing programs, and initiatives to assist less-qualified teachers meet standards. One potential solution has been notably missing from the teacher education equation – offering formal bachelor’s degrees in education at Virginia’s institutions of higher education. Currently, Virginia’s teacher education provisions prevent colleges and universities from awarding undergraduate education degrees in most subjects outside of arts, special education and vocational education.

 

According to officials at the State Council on Higher Education in Virginia (SCHEV), the Commonwealth's policy dates back to 1986, when then-Gov. Baliles convened a Commission on Excellence in Education charged with developing of a set of recommendations that would "place Virginia's public elementary and secondary schools into the first-rank in education in the nation." As an outgrowth of those discussions, Virginia's college and universities refocused their teacher training programs on subject matter and not on educational pedagogy. The state mandated that undergraduates NOT be offered majors in elementary or secondary education and natural or social science education (those core subjects under NCLB). Instead, students desiring teaching careers are required to pursue bachelor's degrees in the content area in which they would eventually teach, while taking supplemental courses in education fields. Since 1990, education has been relegated to the practical equivalent of a minor field of study.

 

Thus, “history education” majors gave way to history majors with an interest and some coursework in education. Today, Virginia's grade-school students’ only exposure to instructors who earned undergraduate education degrees from Virginia colleges and universities after the 1990 changes are in subjects such as music, art, agriculture, and physical education. An amazing irony is that these classes are most vulnerable to cutbacks in today's high-stakes SOL testing environment in favor of core subjects.

 

Virginia's university-level education schools do offer masters and doctoral programs in education. Therefore, individuals interested in education-specific degrees must enroll in graduate programs. On top of that, they must take several standardized tests and conduct student teaching if they are to be fully credentialed. For those who want to teach for less than three years, no credentials are required for the first three years of teaching.

 

Over the past year, I have spoken with a number of dedicated educators - superintendents, central office personnel, administrators, classroom teachers - who believe that this approach to teacher education should be reconsidered. Smaller rural districts and harder-pressed urban districts note that the current rules may serve as an impediment to recruiting and retaining a well-trained teaching force. Such school districts lose promising young teachers to higher-paying districts or to school systems in communities with better quality of life. In some cases, schools have hired less-qualified instructors, including those who have not passed the requisite examinations and even those with little or no education coursework, for up to the three years allowed under state law.

 

In some areas, provisionally certified teachers represent a significant proportion of classroom instructors. One school superintendent noted anecdotally that more psychology majors had been hired to teach classes in that district than other types of degree holders. For those targeting education majors, recruitment sometimes focuses on adjacent states like Maryland and North Carolina which offer a fuller complement of undergraduate education degrees.

 

Admittedly, no definitive “proof” exists as to whether teachers with undergraduate education majors in education are inherently better than those who pick liberal arts, science, or other majors and simply take the requisite education courses. Still, a strong case can be made that in the decade-and-a-half since Virginia’s policy was implemented, the environment of public education has shifted considerably. With No Child Left Behind placing emphasis on teacher quality and qualifications as a measure of academic progress, it would seem prudent for Virginia’s leaders to rethink the Commonwealth’s teacher education regime. While Tarheel and Terrapin alums are no doubt well-qualified to teach, I'm sure that Virginia families would also like to see their kids taught by a fair share of equally-prepared Cavaliers, Hokies, Rams, Patriots or Trojans.

 

Even if a wholesale policy change is not on the horizon, it stands to reason that Virginia should encourage its higher education institutions to explore developing more specific undergraduate educational degree programs. Doing so would not necessarily detract from their current menu of options, which they will undoubtedly guard closely, but it may allow for greater academic preparation for students who are seriously committed to becoming teachers earlier in their careers. At best, such efforts may help needier districts gain access to a greater supply of qualified teaching prospects. At worse, it could help Virginians assess the true benefits of a 16-year-old policy, thus enhancing accountability.

 

As it stands now, our colleges and universities are producing credentialed and educated professionals in fields such as marketing, accounting, engineering, criminal justice, and even sports management. Yet, when it comes to getting a degree in education, future teachers enrolled in Virginia higher education institutions remain SOL.

 

-- May 1, 2006

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

About Conaway Haskins. Conaway Haskins is a nonprofit executive & freelance writer in Chesterfield County. Read his profile here.

 

Contact him at:

southofthejames

   [at]gmail.com