The Jefferson Journal

Michael W. Thompson



Issues that Can Make a Difference

 

 

The state budget will grow $11 billion over the next two years. Here are some ideas to ensure that money is well spent.


 

A new governor, 17 new members of the House of Delegates, a huge budget proposal and critical issues facing our state set the stage for what could be an exciting session of the General Assembly.

 

Gov. Mark R. Warner left office with a 70 percent approval rating, having provided the leadership and vision that the Commonwealth desperately needed. His departure leaves a void. Whether newly elected Gov. Tim Kaine or someone else fills it, and how they fill it, will determine the future of the Commonwealth over the next few years.

 

Issues are the core of political leadership, and those who promote the right issues in a reasonable and “user friendly way” can become major leaders in our state.  Here are some issues that can make a difference.

 

The proposed budget presented by Mark Warner as he left town totals $74 billion, an increase of $22 billion or 42 percent since he was sworn into office four years ago, and an increase of $11 billion over the last two year budget.  House Appropriations Chairman, Vince Callahan, said recently that the state needs about $3 billion more in this new budget just to keep up with Medicaid and K-12 obligations. That leaves about $8 billion on the table over and beyond the last two year budget -- a great deal of money. It looks like the General Assembly will again spend every dollar that comes into the state treasury growing state government.               

 

A new study by the Thomas Jefferson Institute, “Picking Low Hanging Fruit from the State Budget,” outlines a number of items that could be eliminated from the budget, re-crafted to match their original purpose or simply gotten rid of altogether. It also outlines those items in the Wilder Commission Report of three years ago that still could be implemented.

 

Some of these suggestions entail industry-funded commissions that have no business cluttering up the state budget. Let those industries police themselves, as do the Bar Association and other professional groups. Many of the suggestions listed in this study deserve to be considered if the General Assembly is serious about getting spending under better control.               

 

It’s long past time for every agency to determine its exact costs for delivering the services that their mission statements detail. The Auditor of Public Accounts has suggested this in the past and the General Assembly should require it in this year’s budget. At one time the Commonwealth Competition Council had a computer based program called COMPETE that the Auditor suggested be used for this purpose. Will this requirement be added to the state budget in order to finally know what is the “real cost” of each agency?                

 

Gov. Warner has left our state with an Executive Budget that is far superior to anything that has been available in the past. This newly crafted budget is much more transparent that any such document in the past. The General Assembly should allocate funds to make sure that this budget is available in printed and electronic versions so that more of our citizens can get a copy. With $8 billion in “new money” being spent, if the General Assembly doesn’t do this it will be a disservice to the people of our state.               

 

Transportation will be the “big issue” in this General Assembly. It should be confronted in a creative and imaginative way if the issues surrounding congestion and commerce are to be handled in a credible manner.  This means that new ideas need to be considered and old projects re-evaluated.

 

For instance, is the expense of the proposed Dulles Rail project in Northern Virginia the best use of our money when there are transportation experts who sincerely believe that a modern, bus rapid transit system can do a better job for much less money. This project needs to be thoroughly reviewed.

 

High Occupancy Toll Lanes, toll bridges, toll roads, contracting out maintenance of our roads, securitizing tolls over a period of time in order to receive much needed monies for transportation, selling transportation assets to the private sector and an effort to take the spending of transportation dollars out of the political process and into a more realistic “what’s really needed” process all need to be part of the overall “Master Plan on Transportation.”

 

Giving “at risk” K-12 students a better chance to gain a solid education should be an issue that the General Assembly takes action on this year. Staunton Del. Chris Saxman’s Tuition Tax Credits passed the House last year and should do so again and the Senate should do the same. Del. Dwight Jones, D-Richmond, is proposing to expand educational options by allowing colleges to create their own 'lab schools' -- authorized by the State Board of Education -- to improve educational innovation for at-risk kids. A dedicated voucher program similar to what is available in Florida for special education students is proposed by Senate Majority Leader Walter Stosch, R-Henrico. And the remedial reading budget should be available only to those school districts that use a phonics-based reading program in their remedial reading programs.

 

Who fills the leadership void left by the Mark Warner moving out of the governorship could be determined by who picks up these issues and runs with them. We need creative thinkers who aren’t afraid to “stir the pot” with ideas that really can work. It will be interesting to see if anyone takes this role.  

 

-- January 16, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Michael Thompson is chairman and president of the Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy, a non-partisan foundation seeking better alternatives to current government programs and policies. These are his opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Institute or its Board of Directors.  Mr. Thompson can be reached here.