FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
September 20, 2005
Speaker Howell,
Chairman Callahan Object to $1.0 Billion Cumulative
Reduction in Dedicated Funds for Commonwealth's Six-Year
Transportation Plan
Objections also
raised over $100 million Reduction for Chesapeake Bay
Clean Up
Administration urged
to restore funding in 2006-08 Base Budget consistent
with state law
RICHMOND--House of
Delegates Speaker William J. Howell (R-Stafford) and
House Appropriations Committee Chairman Vincent F.
Callahan, Jr. (R-McLean) today issued the following
statement following yesterday's Warner Administration
presentation to the House Appropriations Committee on
developing the Commonwealth's base budget for the
2006-2008 biennium:
"In the 2005
Session, House Republicans initiated, introduced and
successfully enacted not only the largest dedication of
funding - nearly $850 million - to Virginia's roadways
and transportation infrastructure in nearly 20 years,
but also a 'bold and unprecedented commitment' according
to the Chesapeake Bay Foundation of $50 million annually
- or $500 million over 10 years - for cleaning up the
Chesapeake Bay and Virginia waterways. What impressed so
many were that both of these innovative initiatives
included new, ongoing and sustained revenues to improve
transportation mobility, increase highway safety, and
reduce the amount of pollution that is released into
streams and rivers that feed the Chesapeake Bay,"
said Speaker Howell.
Speaker Howell
continued: "The Governor proudly signed these House
Republican legislative initiatives into law just months
ago. That's why I am dismayed that the Administration
now is eliminating $290 million in dedicated
transportation funding and eliminating another $100
million for water quality improvements in the 2006-08
state budget that the Governor is preparing. Not only
are the Administration's actions misguided, but they
also fail to recognize previous funding commitments by
the General Assembly clearly expressed in the Code of
Virginia. Chairman Callahan and I respectfully urge
Governor Warner to join House Republicans now to restore
this base level of funding. If the Governor chooses not
to do so, House Republicans will insist upon and vote
for a budget that restores this critical funding during
the 2006 Session."
"I am truly
troubled by the cavalier attitude toward the law on the
books that the Administration appears to be taking as it
develops the base budget for the 2006-08 biennium,"
said House Appropriations Committee Chairman Vincent F.
Callahan, Jr. (R-McLean). "I do not know what the
Governor's final budget will yield for transportation.
However, I am confident that the budget crafted by the
Appropriations Committee next year will fully recognize
the previous funding commitments we have made to
retiring the FRAN debt and to depositing the one-third
of the insurance premium tax to transportation. Frankly,
the Speaker and I believe that to continue with this
uncertainty only serves to heighten the distrust
taxpayers have in our ability to keep our word and
fulfill our commitment not to divert transportation
funding from its intended purpose."
Yesterday, the
Governor's Department of Planning and Budget made a
presentation to the House Appropriations Committee that
outlined the Administration's 2006-08 base budget
adjustments. There are two actions that, if left
uncorrected, will result in a cumulative reduction of
over $1.0 billion in the six-year transportation plan, a
third of which will directly impact road construction in
Northern Virginia.
According to the Warner
Administration, the annual deposit of the insurance
premium revenue to the Priority Transportation Fund will
not continue in FY 2007 and FY 2008. The Virginia
Transportation Act of 2000 requires that one-third of
the insurance premium revenue be deposited to the
Priority Transportation Fund. Earlier this year, the
Governor proposed language eliminating this statutory
requirement in budget amendments submitted to the 2005
General Assembly. House budget and the adopted budget
rejected this proposal. As required by statute, the
House budget and ultimately the final conference report
appropriated $107.6 million from this source for
transportation during the 2005 Session.
The other
transportation-related action removes the general fund
appropriation that has been pledged for the retirement
of the Federal Revenue Anticipation Notes (FRANS). That
action is inconsistent with language included in the
adopted in the 2005 Amendments to the 2004-2006 State
Budget. That language states: "It is the intent of
the General Assembly that general fund appropriations to
the Priority Transportation Fund shall include the
amounts required to offset the debt service payment
requirements on the Transportation Trust Fund
attributable to the $317,000,000 of the Federal Highway
Reimbursement Notes until such debt has been
retired." (Chapter 951, 2005 Acts of Assembly).
These FRANS cannot be retired prior to their maturity
and general funds will be required until 2013 for debt
service. Either general funds will be provided for
future debt service or transportation revenue that could
be used for road projects will be required to pay this
FRAN debt service.
In addition to removing
funding for transportation, the Warner Administration's
Department of Planning and Budget also stated yesterday
that the 2006-08 base budget removes $50 million in
general fund support to reduce the nutrients discharged
by wastewater treatment plants located in the Chesapeake
Bay watershed.
As originally proposed
by House Republicans in House Bill 2777 (Louderback)
during the 2005 Session, $500 million over a period of
10 years would have been deposited to the Water Quality
Improvement Fund (WQIF) to address the nutrients
discharged by the 120 wastewater treatment plants listed
as "significant dischargers." The legislation
approved by the 2005 General Assembly established a
policy requiring the Commonwealth to provide the
financial support necessary to support these grants.
While some in the Administration may believe and state
that the $50 million was a one-time payment to the WQIF,
House Republicans believe that given Virginia's
commitment to cleaning up the Chesapeake Bay by 2010 and
the requirements of a federal consent decree, it is
absolutely clear that the General Assembly considered
this an ongoing commitment.
|