Virginia
FREE
House
of Delegates Ratings
|
District |
Delegate |
Cum.
Business
Rating
|
2005
Business
Rating
|
Vote
%
|
Steward-
ship
|
Effective-
ness
|
59 |
Abbitt,
Watkins M. |
70 |
76 |
86% |
66 |
61 |
42 |
Albo,
David B. |
81 |
75 |
77% |
73 |
76 |
89 |
Alexander,
Kenneth |
67 |
66 |
69% |
63 |
51 |
44 |
Amundson,
Kristen |
65 |
65 |
71% |
59 |
55 |
10 |
Armstrong,
Ward L. |
63 |
70 |
73% |
67 |
68 |
18 |
Athey,
Clifford L. |
70 |
74 |
85% |
63 |
59 |
95 |
BaCote,
Mamye E. |
59 |
59 |
62% |
55 |
47 |
64 |
Barlow,
William K. |
66 |
69 |
69% |
69 |
60 |
71 |
Baskerville,
Viola O. |
52 |
56 |
54% |
57 |
50 |
58 |
Bell,
Robert B. |
73 |
77 |
92% |
61 |
58 |
32 |
Black,
Richard H. |
68 |
60 |
77% |
42 |
42 |
48 |
Brink,
Robert H. |
56 |
51 |
46% |
56 |
51 |
23 |
Bryant,
L. Preston |
82 |
86 |
86% |
86 |
77 |
22 |
Byron,
Kathy J. |
78 |
74 |
87% |
61 |
63 |
34 |
Callahan,
Vincent F. |
74 |
78 |
79% |
77 |
79 |
5 |
Carrico,
Charles W. |
69 |
71 |
77% |
65 |
57 |
24 |
Cline,
Benjamin |
65 |
72 |
86% |
58 |
54 |
88 |
Cole,
Mark L |
65 |
64 |
77% |
50 |
46 |
78 |
Cosgrove,
John A. |
68 |
68 |
77% |
58 |
55 |
75 |
Councill,
J. Paul |
75 |
75 |
77% |
72 |
60 |
66 |
Cox,
M. Kirkland |
77 |
75 |
86% |
63 |
78 |
41 |
Dillard,
James H. |
69 |
74 |
75% |
73 |
69 |
9 |
Dudley,
Allen W. |
75 |
74 |
86% |
62 |
56 |
49 |
Ebbin,
Adam P. |
54 |
54 |
54% |
54 |
48 |
47 |
Eisenberg,
Albert |
54 |
48 |
43% |
53 |
43 |
17 |
Fralin,
Jr., William H. |
80 |
88 |
100% |
76 |
62 |
52 |
Frederick,
Jeff |
55 |
52 |
62% |
42 |
36 |
91 |
Gear,
Thomas D. |
63 |
66 |
85% |
47 |
45 |
8 |
Griffith,
H. Morgan |
70 |
76 |
86% |
66 |
79 |
69 |
Hall,
Franklin P. |
67 |
72 |
77% |
67 |
67 |
93 |
Hamilton,
Phillip A. |
76 |
82 |
92% |
71 |
73 |
55 |
Hargrove,
Frank D. |
78 |
85 |
93% |
77 |
72 |
60 |
Hogan,
Clarke N. |
71 |
76 |
86% |
66 |
67 |
90 |
Howell,
Algie |
64 |
62 |
77% |
46 |
37 |
28 |
Howell,
William J. |
75 |
81 |
85% |
77 |
83 |
40 |
Hugo,
Timothy |
73 |
77 |
92% |
62 |
62 |
38 |
Hull,
Robert D. |
52 |
58 |
54% |
62 |
55 |
16 |
Hurt,
Robert |
73 |
81 |
85% |
77 |
70 |
62 |
Ingram,
Riley E. |
79 |
86 |
92% |
80 |
73 |
56 |
Janis,
William R. |
69 |
73 |
92% |
54 |
55 |
79 |
Joannou,
Johnny S. |
52 |
63 |
64% |
61 |
61 |
4 |
Johnson,
Joseph P. |
61 |
69 |
71% |
67 |
59 |
70 |
Jones,
Dwight C. |
50 |
61 |
67% |
54 |
48 |
76 |
Jones,
S. Chris |
79 |
92 |
100% |
84 |
78 |
6 |
Keister,
W.B. |
60 |
65 |
71% |
58 |
47 |
1 |
Kilgore,
Terry G. |
71 |
76 |
79% |
73 |
74 |
25 |
Landes,
R. Steven |
75 |
79 |
92% |
66 |
70 |
100 |
Lewis,
Lynwood |
76 |
76 |
77% |
75 |
62 |
31 |
Lingamfelter,
L. Scott |
68 |
68 |
77% |
58 |
57 |
15 |
Louderback,
Allen |
73 |
81 |
92% |
70 |
61 |
68 |
Marrs,
Bradley P. |
66 |
67 |
83% |
51 |
51 |
14 |
Marshall,
Daniel W. |
78 |
84 |
92% |
76 |
69 |
13 |
Marshall,
Robert G. |
63 |
64 |
77% |
50 |
47 |
33 |
May,
Joe T. |
79 |
82 |
85% |
79 |
73 |
84 |
McDonnell,
Robert F. |
79 |
85 |
100% |
69 |
74 |
97 |
McDougle,
Ryan T. |
67 |
74 |
85% |
63 |
57 |
51 |
McQuigg,
Michele |
66 |
63 |
69% |
56 |
50 |
80 |
Melvin,
Kenneth R. |
52 |
60 |
55% |
64 |
62 |
74 |
Miles,
Floyd H. |
63 |
64 |
67% |
60 |
53 |
87 |
Miller,
Paula |
69 |
69 |
77% |
61 |
43 |
46 |
Moran,
Brian J. |
63 |
74 |
77% |
71 |
71 |
98 |
Morgan,
Harvey B. |
70 |
70 |
67% |
73 |
68 |
27 |
Nixon,
Samuel A. |
81 |
89 |
100% |
78 |
75 |
7 |
Nutter,
David A. |
70 |
79 |
85% |
72 |
62 |
73 |
O'Bannon,
John |
72 |
78 |
85% |
70 |
67 |
94 |
Oder,
G. Glenn |
78 |
85 |
92% |
77 |
68 |
54 |
Orrock,
Robert D. |
75 |
82 |
86% |
77 |
73 |
50 |
Parrish,
Harry J. |
78 |
89 |
92% |
85 |
81 |
37 |
Petersen,
Chapman |
67 |
72 |
54% |
89 |
54 |
2 |
Phillips,
Clarence E. |
55 |
78 |
69% |
86 |
53 |
36 |
Plum,
Kenneth R. |
52 |
56 |
53% |
59 |
56 |
99 |
Pollard,
Albert C. |
59 |
69 |
77% |
61 |
57 |
82 |
Purkey,
Harry R. |
79 |
79 |
93% |
65 |
61 |
19 |
Putney,
Lacey E. |
75 |
83 |
92% |
74 |
74 |
96 |
Rapp,
Melanie L. |
70 |
66 |
77% |
55 |
48 |
67 |
Reese,
Gary A. |
73 |
73 |
77% |
69 |
64 |
72 |
Reid,
John S. |
79 |
71 |
83% |
59 |
63 |
86 |
Rust,
Thomas D. |
77 |
76 |
77% |
75 |
67 |
20 |
Saxman,
Christopher B. |
70 |
77 |
85% |
68 |
62 |
30 |
Scott,
Ed |
81 |
85 |
93% |
77 |
64 |
53 |
Scott,
James M. |
62 |
59 |
54% |
63 |
58 |
35 |
Shannon,
Stephen |
75 |
73 |
71% |
75 |
65 |
29 |
Sherwood,
Beverly J. |
76 |
77 |
86% |
68 |
64 |
12 |
Shuler,
James M. |
73 |
74 |
79% |
68 |
60 |
43 |
Sickles,
Mark |
68 |
72 |
85% |
59 |
49 |
77 |
Spruill,
Lionell |
52 |
59 |
62% |
56 |
52 |
3 |
Stump,
Jackie T. |
53 |
64 |
64% |
63 |
62 |
81 |
Suit,
Terrie |
79 |
80 |
93% |
66 |
67 |
85 |
Tata,
Robert |
77 |
83 |
93% |
72 |
68 |
45 |
*
Van Landingham, Marian |
46 |
|
|
|
|
57 |
Van
Yahres, Mitchell |
48 |
49 |
43% |
54 |
47 |
92 |
Ward,
Jeion |
59 |
61 |
69% |
52 |
43 |
83 |
Wardrup,
Leo C. |
79 |
78 |
92% |
63 |
72 |
11 |
Ware,
Onzlee |
58 |
65 |
70% |
60 |
52 |
65 |
Ware,
R. Lee |
74 |
81 |
93% |
69 |
68 |
39 |
Watts,
Vivian E. |
59 |
61 |
62% |
60 |
55 |
26 |
Weatherholtz,
Glenn M. |
76 |
84 |
100% |
68 |
62 |
21 |
Welch,
John J. |
65 |
76 |
100% |
52 |
49 |
61 |
Wright,
Tommy |
66 |
72 |
86% |
58 |
50 |
|
*
Del. Marian VanLandingham was unable
to participate in the 2005 General
Assembly session due to illness.
|
|
Note:Only
99 members of the House of Delegates
are shown due to the resignation of
Del. Fenton Bland(HD 63).
|
|
Definition
of Categories
Cumulative
Business Rating
Virginia
FREE's
Cumulative Business Rating indicates the average
of each legislator’s Virginia
FREE
Business Ratings from 1995 through 2005 or, for
those taking office after 1995, the average from
the legislator’s first year in office through
2005. For several senators, the Cumulative
Business Rating includes prior service in the
House of Delegates.
Business
Rating:
The
Virginia
FREE
Business Rating is the legislator's score based on
Virginia
FREE
evaluations of incumbent performance on important
business issues. Each legislator's Business Rating
is determined by averaging the results of two
tests:
1)
Incumbent Voting Records on important business
issues
2)
The Virginia
FREE
Stewardship Evaluation of legislators
The
Business Rating is on a 100-point scale where 100
is the highest possible rating.
Business
Rating Scale
Base
- Legislators
with a Business Rating of 75
or above;
consistent
supporters of pro-business views.
Swing
- Legislators
with a Business Rating of 74-55;
frequent
supporters of pro-business views.
Occasional
- Legislators
with a Business Rating below
55;
occasional
supporters of pro-business views.
Voting
Records:
Virginia
FREE
compiles annual voting records of all General
Assembly members on important legislation
affecting business and industry. This evaluation
does not portray a legislator's complete
performance on important business issues. Nor does
it include all
legislation affecting business and industry.
Rather, it provides a representative sample of
important bills and votes affecting
Virginia's
business environment. Voting Record scores are
combined with Stewardship Evaluations to determine
each legislator's Business Rating.
To
compile Voting Records, all Virginia
FREE
members are asked to submit at least five bills
from each legislative session affecting their
business interests and to indicate whether they
favor or oppose each one. Virginia
FREE takes no position on
legislation and therefore stringently follows the
consensus position of its members.
Members submit hundreds of bills each year to be
considered for use in Voting Records. Bills and
votes are then reviewed and selected by the
Virginia
FREE
Evaluations Committee and approved by the Board of
Directors.
To
be included in Voting Record evaluations, a bill
must meet the following criteria:
1)
A meaningful vote must be recorded on the bill.
2)
The bill must be of substantial concern to a broad
base of business interests.
3)
There must be a consensus position on the bill
among
Virginia
FREE
members & the board of directors.
Stewardship
The
Stewardship Evaluation is the result of an annual
survey of about 100 Virginia FREE member
government affairs professionals to determine, in
their informed opinions, the percentage of time
each legislator can be counted on to advocate the
best interests of business and industry.
Stewardship Evaluation ratings are combined with
Voting Records to determine a legislator's
Business Rating.
To
determine Stewardship Evaluations, Virginia FREE
member government affairs professionals are asked
to complete a confidential, anonymous survey in
which they subjectively evaluate legislators on a
10-point scale from 0 - 100. In gauging the level
of stewardship displayed by an individual
legislator, survey participants are asked to
consider the percentage of time each legislator
can be counted on to advocate the best interests
of business and industry in Virginia. They are
asked to take into account each legislator’s
commitment to responsible governance that rises
above partisanship and serves the long-term
economic health and competitiveness of the
Commonwealth. Survey participants are asked to also
consider each legislator’s willingness to
advance measures that:
-
Encourage
economic development, business investment, job
creation, and the efficient, productive use of
government resources
Effectiveness
The
Effectiveness Rating is the result of an annual
survey of
Virginia
FREE
member government affairs professionals to
determine, in their informed opinions, how
effective each legislator is in accomplishing his
or her legislative objectives - without regard to
the legislator’s position on business issues.
To
determine the Effectiveness Rating,
Virginia
FREE
member government affairs professionals are asked
to complete a confidential, anonymous survey in
which they rate the level of effectiveness of each
legislator on a 10-point scale from 10-100 where
100 represents extremely effective.
The results of all survey forms are
averaged to determine each legislator’s
Effectiveness Rating.
|
|