Virginia Pundit Watch

Will Vehrs


 

 

Abuse and Scorn Round-Up

 

With Virginia punditry nearly suspended by holidays and anticipation of the Tuesday, April 13th, vote on higher taxes by the House of Delegates, a review of the “polite discourse” surrounding the House’s performance is in order.

 

Stalwart GOP critic Gordon Morse paternalistically addressed his Republican “friends” in a Washington Post piece. The anti-tax crowd lobbying them plays “fast and loose the facts,” but the vote on higher taxes represents “coming to grips with reality.” Noting that the absence of four anti-tax Republicans allowed the finance committee to approve the tax measure headed for the full House, he sarcastically wondered, “How much else could have been accomplished if a load of House Republicans had stayed home for the entire session.” Morse singles out Del. Steve Landes, R-Weyers Cave, for opposing tax increases yet supporting pork for his district.

 

Another dependable mainstream critic, Bob Gibson of the Daily Progress, blames the re-districting under former Republican House Speaker Vance Wilkins for the House’s performance. Calling the gerrymandering a “gift” from Wilkins, Gibson sees it as having an “unintended” result:

 

The list of unintended consequences from Wilkins’ gift flows from the power to avoid compromise and hold onto power. Shutting down state government by holding out past June for a no-tax-increase position and sticking extra burdens on local governments are options on the list.

 

House moderates probably will save the Republican Party and its majority from going over the cliff in an act of hard-nosed hubris, but Wilkins’ redistricting gift created so many House districts that are so heavily Republican that many in the caucus feel the seeming ability to stare down Senate Republicans forever.

 

Of course, Senate Republicans would never stare down the House on behalf of new taxes.

 

A new face in the “Virginia Professor-Pundit” niche already ably occupied by UVA’s Larry Sabato and VCU’s Robert Holsworth, among others, emerged to beat up on Republicans. Quentin Kidd, a government professor at Christopher Newport University, wrote in the Washington Post of the GOP’s failures:

 

This budget conflict is a real problem with severe implications for the commonwealth, but at its core, it's a symptom of another, more fundamental, battle: Virginia Republicans' struggle for maturity as a governing party. Governing, as it happens, involves such skills as compromise, pragmatism and a willingness to make tough decisions when necessary. But at the moment, Virginia Republicans look like nothing so much as teenagers, fighting for respect but struggling with responsibility. The carefree habits of adolescence are hard to kick, and the burdens of adulthood pop up everywhere. But unless the Republicans grow up soon, the voters may decide they aren't responsible enough to govern.

 

Oh, and Kidd has just written a book on Virginia politics, one plugged very nicely by the Post.

 

For those who’d rather have all their Republican-bashing in one convenient spot, there’s the Robert Griendling weblog Commonwealth Common-

sense. Common sense appears to emanate only from the left nationally and from the pro-tax side in Virginia, to judge from Griendling’s links and approving commentary whenever anti-tax forces are criticized. After quoting anti-tax Del. Terry Kilgore, R-Gate City, Griendling identifies him as “The evil twin,” apparently to differentiate him from his brother, Republican Attorney General Jerry Kilgore, “The Other Evil Twin.”  

 

Is anyone defending the anti-tax House Republicans? 

 

Weblogger Ben Domenech has waged a lonely battle supporting them, but even he admitted that the outlook for anti-tax forces was “grim.” Domenech railed against House Republicans supporting new taxes as “toad swallowers,” a name conferred on them by former Reagan budget director James Miller. Domenech embraces the ultimate hardcore Republican position: “Those Republicans who stood for higher taxes and higher spending deserve to be run out of town on a rail, even if it means losing the GOP majorities in Richmond.”

 

A. Barton Hinkle of the Richmond Times-Dispatch remained an oasis of balance in a desert of partisanship. He noted contradictions: A Times-Dispatch poll on the budget standoff showed, “Those who favor only spending cuts outnumber those who favor only tax hikes by more than two to one,” while those who appeared at town hall meetings overwhelmingly favored higher taxes. Hinkle wondered aloud if both sides were truly committed to principle over politics, quoting Ernest Hemingway’s famous line, “Isn’t it pretty to think so?”

 

Pundit Versus Broker

 

Gov. Mark Warner took to the op-ed pages of the Daily Press to argue for his budget plan, somewhat oblivious to the fact that his plan is barely recognized as a potential compromise between the vast differences between the Senate plan and that of the House. He criticized the House plan as inadequate, but offered no criticism of the Senate plan to raise taxes much higher than his proposal. The Governor appeared to be more of a pundit and less of a broker.

 

Pundit Blowback

 

In an unusual Washington Post op-ed page development, Del. James Dillard, R-Fairfax, took on a critical column by Melanie Scarborough, highlighted in the last edition of Virginia Pundit Watch. Dillard didn’t refute her charges so much as claim that her focus on Gov. Warner’s past promises “diverted attention from the realities of 2004.” He urged support for what would become the House budget bill that will be considered on Tuesday.

 

Baseball Treachery?

 

Marc Fisher of the Washington Post led a chorus of Northern Virginians outraged that major league baseball was considering the Norfolk area — Norfolk! — instead of NVA for a team. “What’s next, Front Royal?” asked an incredulous Fisher. Hmm, the good folks of Front Royal and Warren County might just consider themselves part of the ever-expanding “Northern Virginia” area.

 

Mystery Women

 

As Warner Administration economic developers struggle with finding meaningful ways of stimulating business formation by women, along comes a study indicating that 64 percent of women involved in venture capital in 1995 had left the field by 2000, as opposed to 33 percent of men. Where did they go? Shannon Henry of the Washington Post reviewed the report and the questions it left unanswered. One interesting note was that women in venture capital did not give other women preferential treatment when funding high-risk investments.

 

General Assembly (W)rap

 

Kerry Dougherty satirized the whole General Assembly in the Virginian-Pilot. She pointed out the important work they accomplished in lieu of a budget, such as scrapping the “controversial” Sweet Potato Board and fixing “that pesky problem of nudist camps for teenagers.” She suggested that legislators designate every February as “Budget Month in Virginia,” but concluded:

 

Whom are we kidding?

 

Our politicians will never pass a “February Is Budget Month” bill. There’s no time. They’re too busy not passing a budget.

 

-- April 12, 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Will Vehrs grew up in Prince William County. He has a degree in American history from the College of William and Mary and an MBA from Chapman University. Will's experience includes a stint with a Fortune 500 company and economic development work in state government. His "Punditwatch" column appears on FoxNews.com and Jewish World Review, as well as on his own Punditwatch website. He also writes for the Quasipundit political site.