Guest Column

Phillip Rodokanakis



Bad Company

When Fairfax County Supervisor Gerry Connolly did consulting work for a Northern Virginia business, was there a quid pro quo for his later zoning vote on four luxury high rises?


 

Gerry Connolly’s ties to the developer community in Fairfax County are too close for comfort. That’s something all Virginians should worry about. Connolly is running to become the next chairman of the Fairfax County board of supervisors. With more than one million residents and a dynamic, high-tech economy, Fairfax County contains 1/7th of Virginia’s population and accounts for 25 percent of the state’s economy. It also pursues zoning and development policies that affect regional transportation systems and create a powerful constituency clamoring for higher taxes – as in, higher state taxes.

 

As the incumbent supervisor from Providence District, a position he’s held for the last eight years, Connolly represents Tysons Corner, one of Northern Virginia’s major business and retail centers. Tysons is booming economically, but it also stands as a monument to atrocious planning. Given Connolly’s financial connections to one of Northern Virginia’s largest developers, the West Group, voters have a right to wonder whose interests he holds paramount – the public’s, or those of his developer pals.

 

Connolly’s financial dealings, one also might think, would prove of interest to Attorney General Jerry Kilgore. Indeed, Kilgore recently opined that the Fairfax supervisor might have violated the state’s conflict-of-interest statutes. Some critics go further, charging that Connolly has broken bribery and criminal conspiracy laws. But Kilgore so far has remained out of the fray.

 

Regardless of how the conflict-of-interest issue is ultimately resolved, the Connolly flap is a window into the political economy of land development in the Commonwealth. In Northern Virginia’s turbo-charged economy, tens, even hundreds, of millions of dollars ride on the outcome of zoning and land use decisions made by local boards of supervisors. Even though most developers may behave ethically, the incentives to influence the political process improperly are undeniable. Elected officials who fail to adhere scrupulously to conflict-of-interest laws fully deserve the suspicion they bring upon themselves.

 

It’s often said in jest that the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors consists of eight mayors and a babysitter. This mocking description contains much truth. The chairman only has one vote and the other supervisors usually defer to each other to avoid opposition when it’s their turn to seek board approval for their pet projects or zoning changes. 

 

Most political observers give Connolly credit for being a savvy politician, an eloquent speaker and a fierce debater. While the board is in session, Connolly usually overshadows his board colleagues. An old hand at politics, Connolly knows how to maneuver to get his initiatives approved by the board.

 

Connolly’s detractors describe him as an arrogant, partisan hack in the pockets of the developers. His arrogance can readily be seen in a quote recently published in a local newspaper where Connolly, a Democrat, referred to two of his Republican colleagues on the Board as the “know-nothing supervisors.”

 

Last month, Supervisor Stu Mendelsohn, R-Dranesville, made a motion to refer recent conflict-of-interest allegations against Connolly to the Fairfax County commonwealth's attorney. The Democrat-controlled Board voted down Mendelsohn’s motion with the help of one Republican, Elaine McConnell, R-Springfield.

 

What motivated Mendelsohn to propose such a drastic motion?

 

On Sept. 9, 2003, The Washington Post reported the findings of its in-depth investigation into Connolly and his dealings with the West Group, a leading commercial land developer in Tysons Corner.

 

The Post concluded that Connolly had improperly lobbied the Board for approval of housing development projects proposed by the West Group, which is closely tied to a recycling company, World Resources. Gerald Halpin, West Group’s CEO, is also the founder and part owner of World Resources. Halpin also happens to be the father of World Resources President Peter Halpin. Both companies are privately held; they share offices and are controlled by some of the same partners and investors.

 

According to the Post, Connolly obtained his consulting work with World Resources by repeatedly lobbying West Group’s senior vice president, Tom Fleury, for extra income to supplement his supervisor salary. Connolly wasn’t shy in his approaches to West Group asking for a job — he even lobbied Fleury, who is West’s County zoning point person, at one of Connolly’s own fundraisers.

 

In what struck some observers as a quid pro quo, Connolly motioned the county board in January to approve West Group’s proposal to build four 19-story luxury condo high rises in Tysons Corner. Connolly pushed the necessary and significant zoning variances through the Board but never revealed that he had received consulting fees from World Resources, which has overlapping directorates with West Group.

 

Connolly then unabashedly wielded a state law requiring county officials voting on zoning variances to disclose “any business or financial relationship” with the applicant to disqualify Mendelsohn from voting on West Group’s luxury tower application. At Connolly’s insistence — and over Mendelsohn’s objections — Mendelsohn had to disqualify himself because his law partner represented Gerald Halpin on an unrelated matter.

 

Mendelsohn’s disqualification left all Dranesville voters unrepresented on an issue of immense importance to them. Many live in neighborhoods adjacent to or near Tysons Corner, meaning that they are impacted by the traffic congestion caused by excessive development and poor planning.

 

On the other hand, Connolly claims he didn’t have to disclose his receipt of hefty fees from World Resource, because County Attorney David Bobzien told him he was only a “consultant” for World Resources, not an “employee.” Bobzien’s opinion is, at the very least, questionable and in all likelihood legally erroneous.

 

The Code of Virginia requires local employees to seek a written opinion from the commonwealth’s attorney — not a verbal response from the county attorney. Interestingly, Bobzien did not put his response in writing until two years after he originally rendered it, just before Connolly decided to run for chairman.

 

Following the defeat of Mendelsohn’s motion to turn the case over to the commonwealth attorney, Del. David Albo, R-Springfield, requested Attorney General Jerry Kilgore to review it. Kilgore’s office concluded that there were grounds for thinking that a violation of the Act had occurred. However, Kilgore also noted that the attorney general had no authority to investigate and prosecute violations of the Act involving county officers and employees. Accordingly, Kilgore referred the matter to Robert Horan, Fairfax’s commonwealth attorney.

 

Luckily for Connolly, Horan is now ensconced in Virginia Beach prosecuting John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo, the two accused in the infamous “sniper attacks” that killed 10 people and terrorized the Washington metropolitan area last year. At the epicenter of a trial receiving international publicity, Horan may be in no position to provide a timely response to Kilgore's referral. So far, his office has been silent on the subject.

 

In a recent letter, to which I was one of the signatories, 50 Virginians implored Kilgore to reopen his review of the allegations against Connolly. They told him that they believe there is probable cause to suspect that more serious offenses are involved, namely, bribery and criminal conspiracy. As such, they asked that he review the allegations with a view of undertaking an investigation into this matter. They also pointed that Horan, who is extremely busy prosecuting the “sniper” cases, should welcome any assistance that may be rendered by Kilgore’s office.

 

Virginia’s bribery statute (§18.2-447) applies to “any benefit” provided as “consideration for or to obtain or influence ... the recipient’s ... vote”.  World Resource provided Connolly with significant financial benefits, which served as consideration not only for Connolly’s vote on the West Group Tyson’s luxury tower proposal, but also to obtain the votes of other supervisors whom Connolly successfully lobbied.

 

§2.2-511 of the Code of Virginia specifically allows the Attorney General to institute or conduct criminal prosecutions in cases involving a conspiracy to commit a felony. (It stands to reason that, if Connolly violated the state’s bribery statute, it required two or more persons to conspire in committing this crime). In such cases, the attorney general need only seek Horan’s concurrence to initiate a criminal investigation before a grand jury of Fairfax County citizens. 

 

The signatories of the letter to Kilgore stated that one man with strong ties to prominent Northern Virginia developers should not be allowed to break the Commonwealth’s laws with impunity.

 

I recently spoke to Kilgore about undertaking a bribery investigation of Connolly’s activities. He responded that proving bribery in a court of law is difficult. Nonetheless, a grand jury investigation could unearth details, not now known, documenting the financial ties between Connolly and certain developers. When witnesses testify under oath in the presence of a grand jury, they often share new details, especially when they come to the realization that they too may be facing criminal charges. In other words, they may sing like canaries!

 

Recently, some new allegations involving donations to Connolly’s campaign have come to light. Campaign Finance reports show multiple contributions from the West Group and other developers whose applications were pending before the board of supervisors. Connolly received more than 120 checks for $199 each, more than $23,880 in the aggregate, from individuals and companies in the development industry. The $199 amount falls $1 short of the $200 threshold that would require a supervisor to disclose the donation before voting on any re-zonings requested by those developers who made the donation.

 

We all wonder how developers always seem to get their way, even when they face fierce opposition from public interest groups. Connolly’s too-close-for-

comfort ties to the developer community may become a showcase example of how the system is being corrupted.

 

-- November 3, 2003

 

Mr. Rodokanakis has provided consulting services to the campaign of Connolly’s opponent, Mychele Brickner.

 

Bring Home the Bacon

Help   About search

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Phillip Rodokanakis, a Certified Fraud Examiner and a political consultant, lives in Oak Hill. He is vice president of communications for the Virginia Club for Growth.

 

He can be reached by e-mail at phil_r@cox.net.

 


 

To visit the VA Club for growth website
click here.


Subscribe to the 

Club for Growth

free news updates