Koelemay's Kosmos

Doug Koelemay



Thunder and Lightning

The electric storm at last week's session of the Wilder Commission was powered by clashing visions of how to address Virginia's fiscal crisis.


Mark Twain liked to observe that the sound and fury of a gathering storm could be misleading. "The thunder makes all the noise," pointed out America's first master of the sound bite, "but the lightening does all the work."

 

And so it is with regard to the Governor's Commission on Efficiency and Effectiveness, which Gov. Mark R. Warner charged with looking "at what services our elected representatives have decided government should provide" and whether "government is providing those services in the most effective and consumer-oriented way." More directly, Commission members led by former governor L. Douglas Wilder, chairman, and Capital One CEO Nigel Morris, vice chairman, are asking what should state government do and why? The questions take on new gravity today as Governor Warner tells the Senate Finance and House Appropriations and Finance Committees that Virginia faces a revenue shortfall in its budget that could well exceed $1 billion.

 

The Commission may not issue its final report until December, but ongoing, sometimes contentious discussions among commission members signal that real issues are involved. Chairman Wilder has used his forceful personality and leadership of the key "organizational structure" study group to elevate one of the Commission's charges – ways to streamline and consolidate state agencies and programs – to prime objective. He has argued that current revenue shortfalls demand immediate cuts to state government spending. Counterbalancing this power of one are all the other commissioners, who have focused more energy on the governor’s injunction to rationalize the lines of business that state government undertakes and to streamline operations with new technology and management tools for the long-term.

 

With his flair for the dramatic, Wilder has hinted at or discussed throughout the Commission's proceedings a list of state government changes he has been compiling for a decade. "There have been many unfounded reports of recommendations we haven't made," he commented in the early days of the Commission. Then, through a letter to Governor Warner a couple of weeks ago, he released a personal list of proposed changes, including privatizing the 263 ABC liquor stores in Virginia and eliminating the secretariats of technology and administration. His fellow commissioners responded by treating the Wilder list as "founded reports of recommendations we haven't made.”

Sen. Walter Stosch, R-Henrico, an accountant by trade, chairman of the Senate General Laws Committee and a senior member of the Senate Finance Committee, has counseled the media that the commission has not reviewed agencies or criteria to evaluate those agencies, much less done the analysis of savings or benefits to be achieved by cutting or merging them. In an early August meeting that media representatives characterized as "raucous," differences boiled over. Commission members made it clear they preferred to develop broad recommendations for managing state government rather than advocate specific cuts in agencies, departments and positions. Wilder abstained from voting for that approach and vowed to ask Governor Warner directly whether he expected recommendations on specific cuts.

 

Wilder's list did raise serious questions that need to be answered before the Commission submits its recommendations. A structure such as ABC, which dates back to a 1934 monopoly and licensing system used by Quebec, certainly could use a new look. The sale of liquor store properties would produce a one-time influx of cash for the state. But it also would be worthwhile to understand whether gaining a lump sum up front can be justified given the loss of an annual revenue stream from state store profits, about $41.6 million in FY2001.

 

At the top of the list of questions for Wilder, however, is how the Secretary of Technology's CIO functions will be better managed under a different secretariat.

Consultants KPMG told the Commission in July that "the lack of integration of services across the various agencies is inconsistent with fundamental business practices," that there is "duplication among administrative processes and information systems" and that there is "inadequate management information for strategic, statewide decision-making." (KPMG also assured the panel that the Commonwealth compares favorably to other states in these inconsistencies. Whew, thank goodness.)

 

Since 1996, state government has spent over $560 million to replace or implement independent administrative systems. Worse yet, state agencies' strategic plans call for implementing 13 more financial management systems, three different payroll systems and three different human resource management systems over the next two years. Eliminating duplication of administrative information systems, KPMG said, would save $100 million a year.

 

Eliminating overlaps in payroll, accounts payable and non-tax revenue collection (licenses, permits and fees) might save $14 million a year, while trimming duplication in warehouse and distribution centers, regional and local office leases, training programs, business and professional licensing and printing could save another $17 million annually. The full Commission is likely to recommend combining data center operations, servers, mainframes, management and help-desk functions in the short term and more outsourcing in the longer term.

 

"State government has done well where there are short-lived, small projects and programs," Senator Stosch suggested early in the hearings, "but not where there are large projects, long-range assets, complex or time-extended transactions." That is where the private sector members of the Commission have concentrated most of their work.

 

Utilizing his strategic planning skills to set out the roadmap for delivering a meaningful executive summary report to the Governor in September, Vice Chairman Morris urged his colleagues to identify changes with "longevity and consistency" that would engender a "culture of change" in state government. Focus, he said. Challenge sacred cows. Use fact-based analysis. Involve stakeholders. Plan for continuity in implementation. And enroll top leadership in execution. A realistic goal, he suggested, would be to submit two to four recommendations with a high probability of being implemented quickly through policy decisions or executive orders, and three to six recommendations with a very high probability of being implemented longer term.

 

Catalogue retailer Bill Crutchfield from Charlottesville took that advice seriously and helped his study group nail state government's organizational culture with five problem points.  

  • There is no uniform set of core values that transcend administrations.

  • The culture of state government does not promote a merit-based management system.

  • The culture does not promote accountability.

  • The culture resists change at all costs.

  • The culture does not embrace long-term thinking.

Crutchfield put a proposal on the table for a new "Office of Management Excellence" to tackle these problems.

 

"The challenge is similar to a corporation that has built or acquired many companies, but not integrated its operations," said former Proxicom founder and Dimension Data executive Raul Fernandez.

 

"The essential change is for state government to respond faster and more productively," added former Landmark Communications executive John O. "Dubby" Wynne.

 

Other private-sector members at the August meeting insisted the Commission do more than rearrange the deck chairs. The management practices group, for example, suggests a comprehensive new "management agenda" for the Commonwealth that includes strategic management of human capital, competitive outsourcing, improved financial performance, expanded e-government and integrated budget and performance criteria as government-wide initiatives.

 

These innovative private executives, carefully recruited by Governor Warner, feel comfortable recommending bold, cross-cutting initiatives that slash across heavily defended program silos of state government. Most have had to apply such practices to their own businesses in the last two years of economic uncertainty. What Wilder counseled them in his thunderous manner last week was to appreciate the reasons, some purposeful, some imagined, that sustain government duplications, even if modern management principles don't recognize them. These intangibles feed inertia, Wilder argued, and respond only to forceful action such as cutting and consolidation.

 

For their part, public officials can become so familiar with existing organizations, problems and politics that alternative solutions just don’t register. But apart from Wilder, the public members of the Commission, from former Senate Finance Committee Chairman Hunter Andrews and former Prince William Board Chairman Kathleen Seefeldt to Walter Stosch and Del. Michele McQuigg, R-Prince William, seem to have embraced the innovative, pragmatic, systemic approach counseled by their private sector counterparts.

 

The Commission's final report in December undoubtedly will reflect both thunder and lightening, if only because Governor Warner and the General Assembly will need some new navigational aids to steer Virginia government through the budget storm in FY2003. Whether there is any long term impact will be a function of how many General Assembly members can buck their own organizational culture and set a new management agenda loose across all state government operations.

-- August 19, 2002