Four
weeks ago in “Nowhere
to Run,” I cited the success of
Fairfax-based Techbook’s “
Delhi
strategy” of out-sourcing labor-intensive IT
work. I warned that regional economic development
strategies aimed at recruiting back-office
operations, fulfillment centers and other
operations employing semi-skilled IT labor could
be built on quicksand. Well, folks, the situation
is going to get a whole lot worse before it gets
better.
India’s
$10 billion information-technology industry grew
20 percent between 2000 and 2001 -- driven by a 29
percent increase in exports. The surge took place
in face of a slowdown in the U.S.
economy accounting for two-thirds of India’s
market. According to NASSCOM, an Indian IT trade
association, the future looks bright. More than
270 Indian companies have set up subsidiaries,
offices or marketing alliances in
the U.S. For
more information click here.
Think
of it: India, a land of more than one billion
people, is home to more speakers of English as a
first language than even Great Britain.
Individuals with an I.Q. of 140 or higher account
for 0.4 percent of the population. Therefore,
India is home to roughly 4 million geniuses. If
the Indians can identify these talented citizens,
provide them with college-level educations, teach
all of them English, and move them into the
nation’s most vibrant economic sector –
information technology – what chance do you give
Virginians of ordinary intelligence and a couple
of years of community college under their belt?
Reason
#2 to Lose Sleep at Night
We're
competing against China, a country with five
million people of genius-level I.Q.s whose English
isn't so
good
but who
are getting connected to the Internet in a big
hurry.
While
we’re on the subject of India,
it can’t hurt to obsess about China.
The Middle Kingdom is fast becoming the workshop
of the world, building its manufacturing sector on
a base of an inexpensive but increasingly
competent workforce. Americans have generally
reassured themselves that while the Chinese enjoy
considerable advantages in labor-intensive
manufacturing, they are no match in products
requiring sophisticated technology and processes.
Now
comes an e-mail demonstrating that the mainland
Chinese are no more satisfied in the 2000s to
settle for low value-added work than the Japanese
were in the 1950s and the Taiwanese and Koreans
were in the 1970s. The difference is there are
roughly 1.3 billion Chinese compared to less than
200 million Japanese, Koreans and Taiwanese
combined.
“Are
you seeking partners in China? … Panfine Group
is very suitable for customers who want a partner
familiar with China's resource service and
production! For more information, please visit our
web-site: www.iampanfine.com.”
Panfine, which has corporate offices in Tapei and
Shanghai, is branching out from its manufacturing
base into distribution. And through its e-mail
marketing, it’s taking the initiative in
identifying new partners. Here’s what the
company offers:
-
“Assembling
& Production: Educated labor and
modernized plant; it will be advantaged in
assembling and production for all kind of
products.
-
“Distribution:
We have strong selling channel that help
customers who intend to distribute their
products in China.
Furthermore, helping customers to
distribute the finished goods to worldwide
channel.
-
“Warehousing:
We coordinate customers’ “Zero-Stock”
policy and manage the material and products in
our warehouse for them.”
I
might add that, based on a population of 1.3
billion, China has close to 5 million inhabitants
with genius I.Q. If it makes you feel any safer,
Panfine’s web masters could polish up their
English. And their naďve use of spam to contact
obviously inappropriate businesses like Bacon’s
Rebellion suggests they have a long climb up the
learning curve.
But
watch out! According to the Neilsen Ratings
people, China has just surpassed Japan in the
number of people connected to the Internet. (More
info.)
Asia
Pacific Internet Population - Q1 2002 |
Rank |
Country |
Total
Internet
Population (millions) |
1 |
China |
56.6 |
2 |
Japan |
51.3 |
3 |
South
Korea |
27.8 |
4 |
Taiwan |
11.6 |
5 |
Australia |
10.6 |
6 |
Hongkong |
4.4 |
7 |
Singapore |
2.3 |
8 |
New
Zealand |
2.0 |
Source:
Nielsen//NetRatings |
-- August 19,
2002
|